deehouie

11 ms·

61.
by deehouie 7y ago
Oh I think you may be right. They might have been understating their GDP. I remember few yrs ago Bloomberg wrote a piece explaining why the Chinese bureaucrats have incentives to under-report.
62.
by deehouie 7y ago
You didn't even get the word right. It's "anti-semitic". And also pls explain and elaborate how is a piece of news about Hong Kong related to the Jews? https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/anti
63.
by deehouie 7y ago
Let me gently suggest you read up on Hong Kong a little bit more. No need to go back 40 yrs. Just last 5. The Umbrella movement in 2014 had greater participation, attracted much more international media attention, subsequently wreaked much
64.
by deehouie 7y ago
I found the sub-story more fascinating than the nuclear incidence. If I understand it correctly, one purpose of these "research" submarines is to find and possibly sabotage undersea communication lines. Well, talk about national s
65.
by deehouie 7y ago
I find it interesting that this is front page news even in Africa.
66.
by deehouie 7y ago
This is actually a Bloomberg story, the news organization that published the notorious spy chip article. I want to add a few notes here. While China is the headlines the past six months, Russia is even a greater national security threat to
67.
Chinese Scientists Guilty of ‘Researching as Asian’ in Trump’s America(scmp.com)
4 points by deehouie 7y ago|2 comments
68.
by deehouie 7y ago
If you believe USA has better human rights record, think again. Just read about how this country treats its black citizens. Let me mention the Vietnam war, for which most HN readers are probably familiar with. I was in the War Remnants Muse
69.
by deehouie 7y ago
Oh, absolutely. That's precisely why US is so upset!
70.
by deehouie 7y ago
I just realize what you're implying here. You think only China state-controlled "bots", or some China govt sponsored actors would be posting comments like what I posted here, right? OMG, if that's what you think, you rea
71.
by deehouie 7y ago
how do you know i'm chinese?
72.
by deehouie 7y ago
So if people disagree with you, they must have an agenda, is that how you think? OMG, you really have problems.
73.
by deehouie 7y ago
I'm so glad you ask. I certainly have an "agenda". That agenda is to give a balanced view on what currently is a completely one-sided criticism of Huawei. Since Trump started the trade war on China, every piece of US media co
74.
by deehouie 7y ago
This is article from techcrunch, a fairly reputable SV publication. https://techcrunch.com/2019/01/26/is-huawei-a-national-secur... Title : Without proof, is Huawei still a national security threat? The title
75.
by deehouie 7y ago
This is the 2nd hit from a google search https://www.tomsguide.com/us/us-huawei-ban-op-ed,news-30132.... "There seems to be something different about Huawei that makes the U.S. government regard the company as a g
76.
by deehouie 7y ago
From a google search, this is the first hit. https://www.theverge.com/2019/3/17/18264283/huawei-security-... Some quotes "This may help to explain why Western governments broadly agree that Huawei p
77.
by deehouie 7y ago
It may be a bad actor in the sense of an aggressive tech giant employing unconventional means to make profit and take market share. But there is zero evidence in the wiki that Huawei is a national security threat. The only evidence it'
78.
by deehouie 7y ago
You should read this wiki in its entirety bef you use it as evidence to support the claim. It cites patent infringements, IP thefts, and then allegations by China's political enemies about the possible backdoors in its equipments. Hu
79.
by deehouie 7y ago
I'm a user of Mask R-CNN. While the masks it generates are great, I find too many false positives. So in applications like this, the alerts you get may not be what you think. Actual available parking spot may not be there.
80.
by deehouie 7y ago
The claim that dealing with Huawei "jeopardizes US national security" has little factual support. It is a political propaganda initiated in the Trump circle. Shame on those who perpetuate it, and shame on those who believe in it.
81.
by deehouie 7y ago
Why is this post not getting more comments!? It's one of the most important dynamics driving innovation in technology. On the one hand, the misconceived confidence of an unskilled newbie gives him/her the motivation to dive into t
82.
by deehouie 7y ago
This piece challenges the current narrative you read in the press. China is an evil surveillance state that spies on its citizens and the rest of the world. Now we know. The greatest democracy of the world also spies on its citizen and th
83.
by deehouie 7y ago
When I saw this headline, I feel really sorry for those millions of non-programmer users. Having used LaTeX for more 10 yrs, I have to say this is one of the worst software in existent. The whole thing is really just a programming languag
84.
by deehouie 7y ago
The implicit assumption in most HN discussion is, if the US's doing it, it's fine and good. On the other hand, if China tries, it's doomed to fail.
85.
by deehouie 7y ago
You'd be amazed how much more technical competent average Chinese are compared with Americans
86.
by deehouie 7y ago
This' another example of the current wide-spread anti-China sentiment. It suggests only Chinese firms inflict such inhuman work demand on their employees. Totally not true. Stressful work condition is the norm in Silicon Valley, it&#x2
87.
by deehouie 7y ago
This comment should move to the top. You see the success stories because they have succeeded. You never hear the failures. And they are everywhere.
88.
by deehouie 8y ago
My experience with HN is, there are some very thoughtful mathematicians engaging in deep research around here. Some of the posts here may make no sense to 99% of the readers ("why on earth should I care about 7-dim stuff, I just don&#x
89.
by deehouie 8y ago
This' something really intriguing to me. Coming from a physics background, this immediately takes me to electrodynamics where the pillar of half of classical physics, namely Maxwell's equ, is built on cross product.
90.
by deehouie 8y ago
I cringe when I see so much goes to building the IT infrastructure and so little to modeling and validating algorithms. Someone points out that most quant funds fail. Key reason is their ML models are badly overfitted. By fitting enough mod

More ›