I'm so glad you ask. I certainly have an "agenda". That agenda is to give a balanced view on what currently is a completely one-sided criticism of Huawei. Since

I'm so glad you ask. I certainly have an "agenda". That agenda is to give a balanced view on what currently is a completely one-sided criticism of Huawei. Since Trump started the trade war on China, every piece of US media coverage of Huawei is negative, portraying it as the greatest evil on earth. That sounds very coincidental and suspicious, does it? If Huawei has been such a bad actor, how come there were hardly much coverage before Trump trade war. It's been around during the Obama administration, during the G W Bush administration, it was already a rising tech startup during the Clinton admin. How come no one noticed it's spying on its customers and other "terrible" behavior? and no one took issue with it? So, answering your question, having follow HN for a short while, I actually feel there is a hidden agenda in the many of the comments here in HN, and that agenda seems suspicious aligned with the Trump administration foreign policy.