Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
davemel37
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
31.
▲
by
davemel37
7y ago
The Daily Show did a hilarious bit on Eruv in the Hamptons. http://www.cc.com/video-clips/1jsrl7/the-daily-show-with-jon...
32.
▲
by
davemel37
7y ago
The only thing an eruv makes permissible is carrying an item from one domain to another. (I.e. a personal house to the public street to a public synagogue.) It's not so much a hack as a way of making the boundry of the two separate dom
33.
▲
by
davemel37
7y ago
https://www.thevillager.com/2006/11/orthodox-jews-debate-l-e... There is debate in the religious community about this eruv and others in Manhattan.
34.
▲
by
davemel37
7y ago
This is obviously messed up, but its nothing new. Thousands of startups growth strategy is ranking organically for brand search of their prospects. Google sells that ad space on branded search, yelp and other directories rank for them. The
35.
▲
by
davemel37
8y ago
I think you are describing the exact concept creep I was railing against. True ABM is platform and ad tech neutral, its almost entirely strategy and deep work in winning over every stakeholder at play with a completely customized content, a
36.
▲
by
davemel37
8y ago
This is a teeny tiny symptom of much more eggregious problem. Online publishing and Digital advertising today is essentially a modern day protection racket. The data targeting is only one iteration of this problem. Google selling ad space o
37.
▲
by
davemel37
8y ago
This is not at all historically accurate. List brokers have existed for at least half a century. Tracking advertising with coupons can be traced to the 1800's if not earlier. Catalog sales, mail order and direct mail businesses have be
38.
▲
by
davemel37
8y ago
This is precisely what Account-based-Marketing is supposed to be. It's too bad there is so much concept creep in the marketing world, its tough to know whats what.
39.
▲
Marketing matters: a higher calling
(linkedin.com)
1 points
by
davemel37
8y ago
|
0 comments
40.
▲
Which Enterprise Products started out solving SMB problems?
1 points
by
davemel37
8y ago
|
0 comments
41.
▲
by
davemel37
8y ago
Thats partially my point. Everyone is thinking about the business case for cost saving around automation for businesses, but that lacks imagination. Automation tools for consumers to interact with humans at businesses is where the real oppo
42.
▲
by
davemel37
8y ago
> Most people working in hair salons or restaurants are very busy with customers and don’t want to handle these calls, so I think the reverse of this duplex system, a more natural voice booking system for small businesses would help the
43.
▲
by
davemel37
8y ago
Marketing is a dirty word to technoligsts. It implies the product needs manipulation to gain adoption... growth hacking strategies have been used by direct response marketers for over 100 years... while it originally was about piggybacking
44.
▲
by
davemel37
8y ago
I think the Biggest mistake people make is asking, "does it work" about any marketing strategy! The question itself begs for an anecdotal answer that is completely irrelevant to your circumstances... More importantly, the amount o
45.
▲
by
davemel37
8y ago
Thats not an SEO argument thats a keyword choice argument. If demand is minimal optimize for competitors brands or comparisons to related solutions to what your audience needs when they are potentially in the market for what you offer.
46.
▲
by
davemel37
8y ago
No ones talking about drug approvals...im talking about IP protections after its approved... do you have any idea how corrupt and regulated that side of the business is? Even generic drug prices are artificially manipulated by the original
47.
▲
by
davemel37
8y ago
The problem here is not business interests its the IP protections that keep the pressure from being applied by the marketplace. I dont know enough to have an educated opinion on healthcare regulation or on social services...but its disengen
48.
▲
by
davemel37
9y ago
How does this article support your claim that Jews survived because they "had means"??? Showing a disproportionate amount of jews in finance in the last 500 years in a few limited instances...in no way shape or form speaks to the
49.
▲
by
davemel37
9y ago
I was taking you seriously until you wrote this, "Judaism's pairing of extreme insularity with great economic success" and this, "Oppression and dispersion takes on a different meaning for those of means" I really t
50.
▲
by
davemel37
9y ago
Well said. One point however... >As you I don't see why someone should be proud about anything inherited. It can be a gift (or a curse), but it is certainly not an achievement. One way to look at this is if you believe achievements
51.
▲
by
davemel37
9y ago
Give Jordan Petersons bible lectures a try (on youtube or his podcast)...they might open your eyes.
52.
▲
by
davemel37
9y ago
>I really just can't understand this frame of thinking that says Judaism is good because it's been going on for long. Im not a rabbi or in kiruv or anything, so take this with a grain of salt...but I would point to Jordan Peter
53.
▲
by
davemel37
9y ago
One possible conspiracy... Facebook stock has dropped a bunch, site usage is down 24% and advertisers are leaving left and right... anounce these audience segments will be gone in 6 months but advertisers can A, reach them now and B, build
54.
▲
by
davemel37
9y ago
THIS! Plus, the pixels ability to learn and adapt and custom audiences... tells them much more than some stale expensive data can.
55.
▲
by
davemel37
9y ago
I highly doubt this had anything to do with CA, outside of some PR timing... third party data is stale and expensive and advertisers were already complaining of costs on FB... this will make it cheaper for mom and pop advertisers and scare
56.
▲
by
davemel37
9y ago
This data had a baked in 10-15% markup...so costs should actually go down for advertisers.
57.
▲
by
davemel37
9y ago
Yes. First party data isnt going anywhere.
58.
▲
by
davemel37
9y ago
I think the pixel and first party data is where the real results come from...the third party data was probably on the chopping block long before this CA story... It will make some marketers feel less in control...but i actually doubt that d
59.
▲
by
davemel37
9y ago
This will actually make facebook ads cheaper...many people dont realize that facebook charges you a markup for some of these targeting audiences.
60.
▲
by
davemel37
9y ago
Honestly, I think this is a fallout of third party data being too expensive relative to the increase in performance more than anything else... middleware ad tech and data sellers are a failed experiment that has been a net negative for adve
More ›