csallen

30 ms·

361.
by csallen 2y ago
Because if your relationship is friendly, cordial and appropriately distanced, there would then be no evidence that you resent her not wanting to date you. Come on guys, this stuff is pretty simple.
362.
by csallen 2y ago
This seems like something you want to be true more than something that actually is true.
363.
by csallen 2y ago
"A sign of" something is not the same as "definitively the cause of" something. A runny nose is a sign of a cold, even though you can have a runny nose without a cold.
364.
by csallen 2y ago
> …these friendships used to be seen as a sign of loneliness or other problems… > One study found that Japanese children played with their personified objects more during the pandemic than they had beforehand, suggesting an increas
365.
by csallen 2y ago
People said similar things about Facebook. "Oh their user growth might be amazing, but they're not making any money, it's not a real business." But it turns out that with enough funding, you can prioritize growth over pr
366.
by csallen 2y ago
I agree, just saying, ChatGPT was a quantum leap, too. That's why it has all the consumer mindshare.
367.
by csallen 2y ago
There's more to business than tech. There's more to business than product. The software behind Facebook as an app wasn't particularly unique, yet it eclipsed the competition. The same could be said for Google. Google didn&#x2
368.
by csallen 2y ago
> I use them constantly and I can still hardly believe they exist!! Exactly how I feel. I probably write 50 prompts/day, and a few times a week I still think, "I can't believe this is real tech."
369.
by csallen 2y ago
That depends entirely on the design of the context around the content. There is no hard-and-fast rule that AI is bad.
370.
by csallen 2y ago
I'm against the idea that past overestimates of technological progress imply that CurrentTechPredictionX must also be an overestimate. It's a lazy way of thinking that fails to actually look at any specific details of either situa
371.
by csallen 2y ago
Every situation is different, and thorough thinking requires taking those differences into account, rather than using oversimplified heuristics.
372.
by csallen 2y ago
I have plenty of money in the bank. I work for myself and set my own schedule. Yet my bills, fines, and letters pile up and accrue late fees constantly. I've filed my taxes late like 7 out of the last 10 years. Maybe I'm naive, bu
373.
by csallen 2y ago
It's actually very normal to crave novelty. It's also normal to become bored with repetitive, boring work. It's not a unique feature of ADHD, nor is craving novelty a diagnostic indicator for ADHD. These are normal features
374.
by csallen 2y ago
This was my impression, too. I've been reading years of hype, so I bought the game a few months ago, and I was unimpressed. But the fact that it's kind of an objective-less sandbox wasn't what got me. I've played plenty
375.
by csallen 2y ago
There is nothing in this article to suggest that OpenAI is "furious" or even upset. Zero evidence. It's total clickbait. And it's embarrassing that so many commenters on Hacker News who want to believe this storyline a
376.
by csallen 2y ago
I came here to say just this. Can we change the headline of this article to something more accurate and less clickbaity? The article unjustifiably labels OpenAI as "furious" despite surfacing zero evidence that that's how the
377.
by csallen 2y ago
Out of curiosity, what have you built? Also, do you enjoy the process of building things?
378.
by csallen 2y ago
My discovery having gone through something similar: If something made you happy and gave you purpose before, it probably will again. So just do it again. The second time around, you may discover that finding success, getting rich, etc., was
379.
by csallen 2y ago
Cool idea, pretty good execution, but your UI is confusing. 1. There's so much happening on the screen between your app's UI and the fake UI with the dark patterns that it's confusing. IMO you should show the objective first,
380.
by csallen 2y ago
Launch platforms are terrible businesses. In fact they're terrible products, too, even if you don't aspire to run one as a business. People don't realize this, so they keep building more launch platforms to replace the previo
381.
by csallen 2y ago
This is an extremely over-simplified take. It depends on entirely on what the farms are producing, their water efficiency, etc. Nobody would seriously suggest that people go hungry so that we can have more chips, so responding as if that&#x
382.
by csallen 2y ago
Because the people en masse have not successfully come together to demand this. What makes companies more powerful than the people is not that companies actually have more power. They don't. It's that they concentrate the power th
383.
by csallen 2y ago
Could someone replicate this feat by creating a "WTF Happened in 19XX" website for any year in the 20th century, then combing through thousands of charts and graphs, and picking only the ones where there was a change in 19XX? Or w
384.
by csallen 2y ago
> Generative art tools are a lot of fun to try out but the lack of fine-grained control over the output greatly limits its utility outside of personal amusement or generating slop. This take surprises. Generative AI images and music ar
385.
by csallen 2y ago
I was wondering the same thing. That doesn't seem to happen in the Lato font on Google Fonts: https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Lato?preview.text=Reaction... EDIT: It's called ligatures: https://de
386.
by csallen 2y ago
Even though saying "small nitpick" is redundant in terms of its literal meaning (denotation), communication is about more than simple denotation. It's also about emphasis, tone, and emotions, and saying "small nitpick&qu
387.
by csallen 2y ago
> Some crime victims would rather have their perpetrators “rot in hell” than see them have these kinds of privileges, said Randall Liberty, commissioner of the Maine Department of Corrections, and victims are notified, and their concern
388.
by csallen 2y ago
I have no qualms with wanting to shape the world when it comes to trying to put your own creations, opinions, etc, into the world for others to have the option to consume. But I'm not a fan of wanting to shape the world by stopping p
389.
by csallen 2y ago
Labels today do things like get their artists added to popular playlists and run major media campaigns. But the latter is definitely reserved for top tier artists. Ultimately it's a tough industry. The fact of the matter is technology
390.
by csallen 2y ago
I disagree. Participation is optional. There is always the option to move to the woods, live in a small cabin or group of likeminded people, and keep to yourself. There is always the option to listen to the music you want. If that isn'

More ›