cristiancavalli

9 ms·

31.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
Given your set of theoreticals then I would concede, yes the model is reasoning. At that point, though, the world would probably be far more concerned with your finding of a question that can only be met via reasoning and would be uninfluen
32.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
Love this question! Really touches on some epistemological roots and certainly a prescient question in these times. I can certainly see a theoretical where we could create this simulation in totality to our perspectives and then venture out
33.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
I can’t and that’s pretty cool to think about! Of course if we’re going that far down the chain of assumption we’re not quite ready to talk about LLMs imo (then again maybe it would be the perfect place to talk about them as contrast/c
34.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
I still think the jury is out on this given that they seem to fail on obvious things which are trivially reasoned about by humans. Perhaps they reason differently at which point I would need to understand how this reasoning is different fro
35.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
I would assume because pacing is a critical issue in most forms of temporal art that does story telling. It’s written about constantly for video games, movies and music. Connect that probability to the subject matter and it gives a great im
36.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
I don’t think this is the watertight case you think it is, furthermore good luck proving with closed models that your question that’s never been asked in any form or derivation (supposedly) is not in the training data.
37.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
No I can “prove” it — look at any number of cases where LLMs can’t even do basic value comparisons despite being claimed as super intelligent. You can try and say well that’s a limitation of the technology and then I would reply — yes and t
38.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
Yes people are claiming different things yet no definitive proof has been offered given the varying findings. I can cite another 3 papers which agree with my point and you can probably cite just as many if not more supporting yours. I’m arg
39.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
I actually just sat down to crack open MITs Theory of Knowledge and it seems promising and free: https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/24-211-theory-of-knowledge-sprin... This also looks promising: https://hiw.kuleuve
40.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
Saying something again does not provide proof of its actual veracity. Writing it in caps does not make it true despite the increased emphasis. I default to skepticism in the face of unproven assertions: if one can’t prove that they reason t
41.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
This is a fun thought experiment and made me reminisce on my Epistemology classes — something I think the current AI conversation would benefit greatly from. I’m super excited about what we’ve created here — less from the practical standpoi
42.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
Disagree — proponents of this point still have yet to prove reasoning and other studies agree about “reasoning” being potentially fake/simulated: https://the-decoder.com/apple-ai-researchers-question-openai... Just cla
43.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
Not true: https://www.caranddriver.com/news/g60385784/bestselling-cars... Model Y is 4th actually and slipping apparently according to October data.
44.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
Do you have a source for any of these numbers or is this just your speculation? I haven’t seen any estimates from well-known institutions that reference any of the numbers your are pointing to.
45.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
Not sure why your valid point is being downvoted. You also brought a source which most people don’t bother. Kudos!
46.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
You may want to try widening your social circles if this is a recurring theme in your life. Making friends as an adult is hard and making intimate connections sometimes even harder. The best thing I did for myself and my dating/persona
47.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
Good for you! You should do what makes you happy and revel in the knowledge that you provide many different kinds of value and you yourself extract value from something you like doing in multiple ways. The way I think about it: no one else
48.
by cristiancavalli 3y ago
Actually it doesn’t — the decline in real income is not huge even on the high end and actual site comments on its findings: “ How would increasing the minimum wage affect the number of people in poverty? By boosting the income of low-wage w
49.
by cristiancavalli 3y ago
Would anyone have an idea as to why it would drop large portions of text as pointed out in the article? Would this be a context window issue? Overall very interesting analysis, thank you!!! (I also thought the comparison to the authors bird
50.
by cristiancavalli 3y ago
Best comment of the week right here. Thank you
51.
by cristiancavalli 3y ago
> Firstly, minimum wage is politically unpopular in most areas. You’re so wrong it’s actually astounding: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/04/22/most-amer... https://www.datafor
52.
by cristiancavalli 3y ago
Sure you can move the goal posts, but just so we have a record of the actual history: You proffered a point: “ If Ford wants to invest in these plants or hire more people, they must hire them from the union. There is no competing, alternati
53.
by cristiancavalli 3y ago
I mean I just did. Your comment is just plain wrong in the face of the cited right to work law for Michigan. Any “requirements” would be this year alone due to the legality of the statute. It’s your turn to present something other than opin
54.
by cristiancavalli 3y ago
Which industries? If you’re gonna point to SAG then sure there are union gigs but that does not preclude one from becoming an actor and working in non union gigs. Perhaps you mean non right to work states?
55.
by cristiancavalli 3y ago
You’re gonna have to cite some sources. I’ve been looking and can’t find a single piece of evidence to back up your claim of union only shops in Michigan. To the contrary Michigan was a right to work state until 2023: “In 2012, Michigan ena
56.
by cristiancavalli 3y ago
Hey at least I offered sources and if you want to throw out ~20 years of data that is pretty damn recent on the premise that business today is so different from the 80s then that’s your no true Scotsman to deal with. Funnily enough some of
57.
by cristiancavalli 3y ago
Conceded that sag has a pretty special case here in the “must join” of course, speaking from the free market view, you are more than welcome to work on non-union gigs of which there are plenty. No one is making you join a union just because
58.
by cristiancavalli 3y ago
You offer no data or citation to evidence your claims so I won’t bother attempting to refute your opinions. > In large I feel your response missed the point I’m making. Which is what? Beyond casting aspersions and making claims with no d
59.
by cristiancavalli 3y ago
> it’s missing the point of a hyper-transactional, individualist economy that’s only getting more so. This runs counter to the fact that we have seen a massive increase in labor organization and union activity over the last 5 years so I
60.
by cristiancavalli 3y ago
Can you proffer any evidence/data to that effect? If it is a monopoly how can we have many non-unionized auto workers working for Tesla and Toyota?

More ›