cristiancavalli

6 ms·

1.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
The second link I posted is specifically from the Australian market. How becoming no 6 in 2024-2025 for a model selling is not “improvement” is logic I don’t understand. They shot to no 6 after not being in the market — that’s obvious impro
2.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
Without any substantive argument you seem to be the one attacking strawmen. Learn to source your argument and present evidence or don’t come to argue. I’m addressing your points and you haven’t added anything of substance beyond stating wha
3.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
> Things haven’t improved for BYD since then. You stated it wasn’t getting better for byd. From the article: BYD revenues in Q3 (July to September) 2024 were 201 billion yuan ($AU42.85 billion) – a record high for the brand and a jump of
4.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
Wrong: https://www.drive.com.au/news/byd-revenue-tops-tesla-for-the... It’s very obviously improving for BYD.
5.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
One might say, if this were a test being done by a human in a history class, that the answer is 100% incorrect given the actual record of events and failure of statement to mention that actual record. You can argue the causes but that’s not
6.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
Because Russia did undeniably open hostilities? They even admitted to this both times. The second admission being in the form of announcing a “special military operation” when the ceasefire was still active. We also have photographic eviden
7.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
First page of Google search results from 7 years ago: https://www.quora.com/You-have-2-cups-of-coffee-50-degrees-w... People making up their own benchmarks for these things has confirmed one thing for me: The bias that peop
8.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
What rumors? I looked and can’t find something to substantiate that #
9.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
That’s a bold statement. US is a young country. Empires that lasted longer by 5x have been consigned to the dust bin of history with nary but an oral tradition to remember them. If looking at americas military capability is any indication i
10.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
The man engaged in massive human rights abuses… https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2022/06/el-salvador-p...
11.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
There are a litany of articles taking about the exact lying you say they are not doing: https://www.businessinsider.com/doge-savings-estimate-websit... https://www.axios.com/2025/02/19/doge-mu
12.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
I think USAID could certainly be classified as “soft power.” I think throwing it all out makes little sense in light of the provably good things it did.
13.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
I postulate a slow, multi-generational decline in critical thinking skills (maybe this is driven, at least partially, by the over abundance of unchallenging media/entertainment) coupled with grievance politics and the bucket-of-crabs m
14.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
What’s beyond a man who would lie about being a gamer (for credz), be so lazy in his lie he is instantly caught, double-down on his lie despite the obviousness of his inability to even use basic mechanics of said games and then beef with In
15.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
Truly incredible how so many people can attribute “whiz kids” to a group of people who can’t even do the most basic due-diligence.
16.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
> So I agree that Congress should make/repeal laws that reduce the size of the executive branch so that only necessary powers are entrusted to the executive branch. This is essentially what the courts are doing through the interroga
17.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
He also lost a ton of $ and you can claim that was on purpose but he also made many attempts to get out of the deal so that would indicate otherwise. Also the sale of the subprime debt by holders suggest that risk was increasing in their ou
18.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
This is a patently false retelling — check your sources.
19.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
Who is claiming that implications inevitability?Shutting down a valid line of discussion because of someone deciding to make a fallacious analogy seems like a proposition that would essentially stop all scientific discussion of intelligence
20.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
Not sure why this got so acrid but I don’t really have any reason to interact with someone saying I have “no merit” You might want to look at how bent-out-of-shape you are getting about a rando on the internet disagreeing with you. Why I wo
21.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
> I keep repeating myself because you seem unable to accept information. I responded to your post with my thoughts and my own reframing of the question to try and open the conversation; you entirely ignored this in your response. Maybe y
22.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
Yep and yep. Did it on two models and by myself — you know if you ask them to cite similar problems (and their sources) I’ll think you’ll quickly realize how derivative your question is in both question and solution. Given that you’re now a
23.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
Repeating a point without proffering evidence only makes it seems as if you don’t have anything to argue of substance.
24.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
Not at all — how many people were geniuses and their parents not? I can name several and I’m sure with a quick search you can too.
25.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
Is it actually reasoning though or just pattern matching? Seems like to compare one should also “know” which your above response indicates they do not. I guess the real question is “does moving down a stochastic gradient of probabilities su
26.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
I’m curious what’s dangerous about it? How do your square the inability to play tic-tac toe or do value comparisons correctly with “we should compare this to a humans reasoning” If it can’t do things like basic value comparison correctly wh
27.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
I’d settle for these things being able to do value comparison consistently well, play a game of tic tac toe more than once correctly or use a UI after an update and not fail horrendously to move the needle a little bit for me. People claimi
28.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
How does this prove reasoning? The thread you point to has several question in it that remain unanswered that ask the same question? How is this not entirely derivative too — there’s a huge number of these kind of 3-box “games” (although I
29.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
I did and I fail to see how you can make those guarantees given you given it as a n interview question? You’re able to the vet the training data of O3? I still don’t see how your answer could only be arrived at via reasoning and that it wou
30.
by cristiancavalli 2y ago
This looks neat but I don’t think it meets the standard for “reasoning only.” (Still not sure how you would prove that one) furthermore this looks to be fairly generalizable in pattern+form to other grid problems so i don’t think it also me

More ›