crisdux

9 ms·

61.
by crisdux 5y ago
There certainly is a balance to giving feedback like this. It very much depends on team dynamic and the level of trust between team members. I have experienced lower levels of trust and worsen proficiency in giving and receiving feedback de
62.
by crisdux 5y ago
I give them the benefit of the doubt that they are trying to create a good product and are truly interested in understanding user needs. afaik they are planning on making the search engine a paid product. Which I'm okay with. I serious
63.
by crisdux 5y ago
I identify with this so much. I use a range of search engines to fulfill specific needs. Examples below. * Google - shopping, consumer oriented, up-to-date local content on restaurants and venues * Google reddit - product reviews, product i
64.
by crisdux 5y ago
How bout airlines and government stop making everything about the flying experience worse and worse every year. It doesn't need to be like this. And in other countries it's not. We are making this a stressful experience.
65.
by crisdux 5y ago
No food is cheap because of our vast productive land and technology. I'm not denying that subsidizes don't exist. You can't just make general statements. If you added up the entire market for all retail and food services-- we
66.
by crisdux 5y ago
Government had a heavy hand in causing the issue and your solution is more government to fix the problem? We need reform. In general, food in the US is not heavily regulated and that's why we have some of the cheapest and most varied f
67.
by crisdux 5y ago
You clearly are not a constructive participant in this issue. > What is the relevance of this at all? You brought it up.
68.
by crisdux 5y ago
Your comment is unproductive and needlessly pejorative. If you are seriously trying to contribute constructively to the problem I outlined, then I think you must (a) acknowledge there is a problem, and (b) acknowledge these institutions are
69.
by crisdux 5y ago
I agree in principle but I think you are missing the controversy that’s going on. These topics are being taught irresponsibly with no regard to the neutrality, openness or critical thinking that you seem to be implying. They are being used
70.
by crisdux 5y ago
I can’t help but be a bit of a contrarian. I’m still skeptical regarding remote work being the optimal workplace strategy. I think there will emerge a competitive edge to companies that have their employees working in office settings, at le
71.
by crisdux 5y ago
What about the studies in the links I provided? I cited my sources. They clearly show for some groups the risk of myocarditis after vaccination is higher than covid. Another piece of evidence. We have multiple countries that have significan
72.
by crisdux 5y ago
Isn't the correct answer to this - it depends? Neither side can make a complete blanket statement. It depends on age and which vaccine you take. For example, the risk of myocarditis is higher for ages < 40 and those who receive the
73.
by crisdux 5y ago
I agree with you on hybrids, I think hybrids are a better fit for most people right now. Especially for renters and households with one car. I also think people need to come to terms with the reality of the world we live in right now and ta
74.
by crisdux 5y ago
> We should be subsidizing conversions like this. This is the epitome of the current green movement. Proponents want an unnecessary luxury green product subsidized for higher income households, even though there are perfectly fine substi
75.
by crisdux 5y ago
I disagree. If not Russia, who do you see as a great power? I would put Russia third on my list, after the US and China. Russia certainly has the political might, intellectual depth, land area, nuclear arsenal, etc that gives them more powe
76.
by crisdux 5y ago
You should not dismiss these views as just Russian-patriot sounding. These views acknowledge a realpolitik world view. They also acknowledge Russia as a "great power". And of course Russia has interests in the affairs of nations i
77.
by crisdux 5y ago
There have not been extensive studies. The original long term safety studies from the vaccine trials were stopped. There are huge issues in the original trials, they were not done with the rigor that we've come to expect from previous
78.
by crisdux 5y ago
Lots of people in this thread are arguing the "do the vaccines reduce spread thing" as justification for or against this policy. I don't think that even matters. These vaccines have risks that are not being opening discussed.
79.
by crisdux 5y ago
That is low quality evidence. It's folks doing some mathematical modeling. Mathematical modeling has had a very bad track record during this pandemic. Did you even read the paper you are linking?
80.
by crisdux 5y ago
It is fairly clear that is it not a significant factor, even before omicron. I don't know how these claims that lack a solid scientific basis still continue. You cannot attribute a capability to a vaccine that has not been confirmed th
81.
by crisdux 5y ago
I am completely aware of that study. That study is exactly what I had in mind when I wrote my comment. The effect sizes were barely significant. Not all groups managed any effect of significance. There are biases, confounding factors and li
82.
by crisdux 5y ago
You are obviously conflating the use of surgical masks in operating rooms that are for stopping droplets with using masks to stop a respiratory airborne virus. How can this possibly be the basis of your argument? It's utter nonsense.
83.
by crisdux 5y ago
You are coming to this article with your own biases. You seem to be basing your analysis that we "know" masking is highly effective. That is not true. The evidence used to justify this policy is low quality(don't you remember
84.
by crisdux 5y ago
These people aren't making honest errors. They are censoring opinions they don't like. It's becoming increasingly more absurd as time goes on.
85.
by crisdux 5y ago
I feel the exact same way as you. This wfh life is not for me. I think it's cruel to force it on young and single employees. I'm having trouble finding a new job that has employees on site. I appreciate you posting this.
86.
by crisdux 5y ago
Maybe instead of ad hominem attacks you should develop an argument. Cheers.
87.
by crisdux 5y ago
Folks need to understand that our current strategy is quite revolutionary. Basically everything goes against previous guidance. We've redefined illness to now mean positive pcr test. Wide spread testing of asymptomatic people, lockdown
88.
by crisdux 5y ago
I wonder if these simulations do more harm. Like it gives people a false sense of security and locks them into a strategy. I think the best illustration for this is covid. Our leaders and experts threw away the pandemic playbook and replace
89.
by crisdux 5y ago
It has a more dangerous risk profile than the previously accepted vaccines. Our medical system should be guided by informed consent not coercion.
90.
by crisdux 5y ago
They would not take the covid vaccine. These vaccine mandates have consequences.

More ›