Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
cremnob
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
61.
▲
by
cremnob
13y ago
There are some real inconsistencies with what the committee claims and what Apple claims in the testimony they released today. In fact Apple said they comply with not only the laws, but also the "spirit of the laws" >Apple complies full
62.
▲
by
cremnob
13y ago
Apple released their testimony today and it specifically addresses this. "Apple wants to make clear to the Subcommittee that the Company does not use its Irish subsidiaries or any other entities to engage in the following tax practices that
63.
▲
by
cremnob
13y ago
Great except for the part where current shareholders' stakes are diluted.
64.
▲
by
cremnob
13y ago
I deleted it after I found out it requires you to have a Google+ account. I guess I shouldn't have had my hopes up considering it's called Hangouts.
65.
▲
by
cremnob
13y ago
Related article http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/05/03/the-shine-starts-we...
66.
▲
by
cremnob
13y ago
Google Finance is definitely not being maintained and I wouldn't be surprised if it's killed.
67.
▲
by
cremnob
13y ago
The difference is that it's 2013.
68.
▲
by
cremnob
13y ago
Absolutely, and the best thing that can happen when a company is repurchasing its shares is for the shares to be as cheap as possible, so as to create the most value for shareholders.
69.
▲
by
cremnob
13y ago
Nope you're incorrect. The shares are repurchased and cancelled which increases the stake of the remaining shareholders in the company.
70.
▲
by
cremnob
13y ago
Because when you repurchase shares beneath its intrinsic value it's accretive to shareholder value.
71.
▲
by
cremnob
13y ago
Apple is one of the few companies left where I don't mind them collecting my data, because it's only going to be used for their own products and services.
72.
▲
by
cremnob
13y ago
This is a clip from the documentary Objectified with Dieter Rams discussing this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahtHKCQUD2k
73.
▲
by
cremnob
14y ago
Facebook doesn't need to fork Android. They're commandeering Android from Google. People using this will be spending time in Facebook's ecosystem, pushing Google's services into the background. And considering that Google doesn't directly p
74.
▲
by
cremnob
14y ago
I don't think you have to worry about it. They aren't going to make radical changes for the sake of tech geeks who are bored if the rest of the customer base likes things the way they are.
75.
▲
by
cremnob
14y ago
Why not have the user decide the first time they launch the browser? They either choose to enable DNT or not.
76.
▲
by
cremnob
14y ago
>I have been meaning to take her to Apple but honestly… dragging an iMac through South Coast Plaza to the Apple store is a fucking miserable proposition, so I’ve been putting it off. There's your problem.
77.
▲
by
cremnob
14y ago
Why would you feel bad about it?
78.
▲
by
cremnob
14y ago
It's about taking every potential data point they can have about you away from them (and thus the ability to monetize it). I switched to Firefox just the other day after reading that article about Chrome vs Firefox and also because the dev
79.
▲
by
cremnob
14y ago
Would Ghostery accomplish the same thing?
80.
▲
by
cremnob
14y ago
What does that have to do with H.264?
81.
▲
by
cremnob
14y ago
Why are Elon's defenders hung up on this? It's a red herring. The car performed terribly in cold weather. That's the point. Elon accused Broder of faking the review and it's been clear that was the distraction he wanted from the beginning.
82.
▲
Apple Rejecting Apps Using Cookie-Tracking Methods
(techcrunch.com)
5 points
by
cremnob
14y ago
|
0 comments
83.
▲
by
cremnob
14y ago
What are some of the workarounds?
84.
▲
by
cremnob
14y ago
What's odd is making the assumption that all Mac purchasers weren't informed consumers. Your attitude reeks of arrogance and superiority (which seems to be common in the tech community). >Most consumers are relatively uninformed, regard
85.
▲
by
cremnob
14y ago
I hope more people read this. There seems to be a fundamental misunderstanding by some people here about the Public Editor (which is actually an ombudsman). That's not going to stop Elon from capitalizing on their ignorance though.
86.
▲
by
cremnob
14y ago
Perhaps. I work in finance, I'm not a programmer or 'hacker' at all. So I constantly feel like an outsider to this community, and especially when stories like this pop-up that really highlight the groupthink.
87.
▲
by
cremnob
14y ago
The divide is between people who have been following this story critically and those that haven't. Most of reddit and many people here have been suggesting he's an oil industry shill that was determined to see the car fail, but they were al
88.
▲
by
cremnob
14y ago
Considering that Elon accused Broder of faking/fabricating the review when he clearly wasn't and that he's focusing on side-stories in order to distract from the fact that the Model S is terrible in cold weather, he's definitely not winning
89.
▲
by
cremnob
14y ago
Tech geeks have a hard-on for Elon Musk. The same is true for HN.
90.
▲
by
cremnob
14y ago
I didn't buy his explanations when I saw him on CNBC and Bloomberg. The impression I got is that he's whitewashing the review, focusing on how fast he was driving and pointing to another NYT reporter who got 300 miles (and when the anchor p
More ›