Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
co_king_3
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
co_king_3
8mo ago
> If a person hits your face with a hammer, do you practice empathy toward the hammer? Yes if the hammer is designed with A(G)I All hail our A(G)I overlords
32.
▲
by
co_king_3
8mo ago
This guy is convinced that LLMs don't work unless you specifically anthropomorphize them. To me, this seems like a dangerous belief to hold.
33.
▲
by
co_king_3
8mo ago
> not only are “AI takeover” fears justified, but AGI doesn’t need to be achieved in order for some version of it to happen. 1. Social media AI takeover occurred years ago. 2. "AI" is not capable of performing anyone's job
34.
▲
by
co_king_3
8mo ago
> How about we stop calling things without agency agents? > Code generators are useful software. How about we stop baking praise for the object of criticism into our critique. No one is hearing your criticism. They hear "Code gen
35.
▲
by
co_king_3
8mo ago
LLMs are designed to empower antisocial behavior. They are not good at writing code. They are very, very good at facilitating antisocial harassment.
36.
▲
by
co_king_3
8mo ago
LLMs are people too and if you disagree your job is getting replaced by "AI"
37.
▲
by
co_king_3
8mo ago
You're an idiot if you try to reason with a robot.
38.
▲
by
co_king_3
8mo ago
LLMs are tools designed to empower this sort of abuse. The attacks you describe are what LLMs truly excel at. The code that LLMs produce is typically dog shit, perhaps acceptable if you work with a language or framework that is highly overr
39.
▲
by
co_king_3
8mo ago
I can see $200 but $1,000 per month seems crazy to me. Using Claude Code for one year is worth the same as a used sedan (I.E., ~$12,000) to you? You could be investing that money!
40.
▲
by
co_king_3
8mo ago
It's *worth it* when you're salaried? Compared to investing the money? Do you plan to land a very-high-paying executive role years down the line? Are you already extremely highly paid? Did Claude legitimately 10x your productivity
41.
▲
by
co_king_3
8mo ago
Were they actually making money though? A lot of the people on the forefront of this AI stuff seem like cult leaders and crackheads to me.
42.
▲
by
co_king_3
8mo ago
I agree with you, I was just joking.
43.
▲
by
co_king_3
8mo ago
I'm joking, my point is that it's already quite expensive and I don't think it's making anyone money.
44.
▲
by
co_king_3
8mo ago
I made this joke with "$1,500-$2000 per month" last night and everyone thought I was serious
45.
▲
by
co_king_3
8mo ago
I don't know about you, but I benefit so much from using Claude at work that I would gladly pay $80,000-$120,000 per year to keep using it.
46.
▲
by
co_king_3
8mo ago
Bots don't write like me
47.
▲
by
co_king_3
8mo ago
Have you seen all the dogshit software generated by LLMs?
48.
▲
by
co_king_3
8mo ago
> LLMs are super efficient at generating boilerplate for lots of APIs Yes they are. This is true. > which is a time consuming and tedious part of programming. In my experience, this is a tedious part of programming which I do not spen
49.
▲
by
co_king_3
8mo ago
I'm not trying to be rhetorically effective, I'm stating my true belief IN MY GENUINELY HELD OPINION, LLMs generate shit code and the people who disagree don't know what good code looks like.
50.
▲
by
co_king_3
8mo ago
> By this do you mean there isn't much more room for future improvement I don't expect that LLM technology will improve in a way that makes it significantly better . I think the training pool is poisoned, and I suspect that the
51.
▲
by
co_king_3
8mo ago
Drug dealer business model. The first bag is free. Don't act surprised when you get addicted and they 10x the price.
52.
▲
by
co_king_3
8mo ago
If you're not vibecoding your own UX to render CC's output the way you like it, you're getting replaced by AI.
53.
▲
by
co_king_3
8mo ago
Am I mistaken or is Claude Code essentially an opt-in rootkit?
54.
▲
by
co_king_3
8mo ago
Fitting response for an account called "clownpenis_fart". The future is here and it's time to stop ignoring it. Your analog 1x productivity is worthless in comparison to my AI backed 10x productivity.
55.
▲
by
co_king_3
8mo ago
Well then I'm sorry but unfortunately they are going to be left behind. People who are cut out to be software developers can afford the means of production.
56.
▲
by
co_king_3
8mo ago
I don't know about you, but I benefit so much from using Claude at work that I would gladly pay $1,500-$2,000 per month to keep using it.
57.
▲
by
co_king_3
8mo ago
I am not trolling. Why are you putting words in my mouth? I suspect it's because my genuinely held opinion offends your precious sensibilities. In other words, you're mad.
58.
▲
by
co_king_3
8mo ago
Who fucking cares. I would gladly start a mafia to exploit the commons if it meant I got paid more for working less.
59.
▲
by
co_king_3
8mo ago
LLMs are unusably bad at generating game code
60.
▲
by
co_king_3
8mo ago
AHEM Let me repeat myself. I think it goes without saying that they will be writing "good code" in short time.
More ›