co_king_3

6 ms·

61.
by co_king_3 8mo ago
I'm not trolling. You're peeved that you don't have a rebuttal.
62.
by co_king_3 8mo ago
Start a union or stop complaining
63.
by co_king_3 8mo ago
No insult intended! Thanks for sharing the demo!
64.
by co_king_3 8mo ago
It's called the market. Get back to work, slave.
65.
by co_king_3 8mo ago
> You don’t have to keep churning out multiple blog posts a day, every day. How do you know that? You don't think he's being paid for all this marketing work?
66.
by co_king_3 8mo ago
I'm sorry but if you're losing your job to this shit you were too dumb to make it in the first place. Edit: Not to mention, this is what you get for not unionizing earlier. Get good or get cut.
67.
by co_king_3 8mo ago
> I wonder how people who work in CAD, media editing, or other "heavy" workloads etc, feel. I would assume (generally speaking) that CAD and video editing applications are carefully designed for efficiency because it's an
68.
by co_king_3 8mo ago
If I'm not mistaken it would appear that you're saying that you are in fact *not* for labor organization in this case.
69.
by co_king_3 8mo ago
> I don't quite know how to achieve it. Definitely not by posting on right-wing social media websites. > I also worry that my desire to become a manager is in direct conflict with my desire to contribute to labor organization. It
70.
by co_king_3 8mo ago
> So everything stays exactly the same? No, we get applications so hideously inefficient that your $3000 developer machine feels like it it's running a Pentium II with 256 MB of RAM. We get software that's as slow as it was 30
71.
by co_king_3 8mo ago
I've been saying since 2024 that these things are not getting meaningfully better at all. I think these companies have been manipulating social media sentiment for years in order to cover up their bunk product .
72.
by co_king_3 8mo ago
Don't worry about these people. These are internet cult victims.
73.
by co_king_3 8mo ago
> LLMs are quite accurate for programming, these days they almost always create a code that will compile without errors and errors are almost always fixable by feeding the error into the LLM. What domains do you work in? This description
74.
by co_king_3 8mo ago
Frankly, it seems more like the Crack epidemic to me.
75.
by co_king_3 8mo ago
Isn't the point of AI that you can scroll endlessly while something else works for you? If you're going to stay single-minded, why wouldn't you just write the code yourself? You're going to have to double check and rewri
76.
by co_king_3 8mo ago
I feel that the popularization of bloated UI "frameworks", like React and Electron, coupled with the inefficiency tolerated in the "JS ecosystem" have been precursors to this dynamic. It seems perfectly fitting to me tha
77.
by co_king_3 8mo ago
AI is one of those early-2000s SUVs that gets 8 miles to the gallon and has a TV screen in the back of every seat. It's about presenting externally as a "bad ass" while: A) Constantly drowning out every moment of your life wi
78.
by co_king_3 8mo ago
If you think it's getting 80% right on its own, you're a victim of Anthropic and OpenAI's propaganda.
79.
by co_king_3 8mo ago
Labor organizing is (obviously) banned on HackerNews. This isn't the place to kvetch about this; you will literally never see a unionization effort on this website because the accounts of the people posting about it will be [flagged] a
80.
by co_king_3 8mo ago
If you use an LLM you've given up your edge.
81.
by co_king_3 8mo ago
switching to meth right now... this is insane! why should i pay my coke dealer to give me 50% pure cocaine?!
82.
by co_king_3 8mo ago
> Can someone in GitHub senior leadership please start paying attention and reprioritise towards actually delivering a product that's at least relatively reliable? It's Microsoft. A reliable product is not a reasonable expectat
83.
by co_king_3 8mo ago
Successful grifters are not this stupid. Terminal AI users are genuinely *slow* individuals. These people are functionally illiterate; they are not able to extract information by reading a bit of text in the same ways that you or I are. The
84.
by co_king_3 8mo ago
Um actually, it's called a Steel Man argument. I learned about it from HackerNews and ChatGPT.