catigula

19 ms·

271.
by catigula 10mo ago
>I find the resulting outlook for employment terrifying. I am enormously concerned about what will happen to the people whose jobs AI renders unnecessary, or who can’t find jobs because of it. The optimists argue that “new jobs have alwa
272.
by catigula 10mo ago
>If you choose TypeScript or Python, you’ll hit a performance wall the moment you venture outside of web apps, CRUD servers, and modeling. This really isn't very accurate. It is for Python, but JavaScript is massively performant. It
273.
by catigula 10mo ago
It seems like you don’t understand reinforcement learning. The signal is reinforced because it correlates to behavior, hacking the signal itself is misalignment.
274.
by catigula 10mo ago
Nobody knows the answer. Answers I see are typically "be a product manager" or "start your own business" which obviously 95% of developers can't/don't want to do.
275.
by catigula 10mo ago
Category error. Intelligence is a different type of thing. It is not a boring technology. >Give humanity's wellbeing the highest weight on its training We don't even know how to do this relatively trivial thing. We only know ho
276.
by catigula 10mo ago
Why would a "real super intelligent AI" be your servant in this scenario? >I hope this hypothetical AI has humans in high regard This is invented. This is a human concept, rooted in your evolutionary relationships with other hu
277.
by catigula 10mo ago
I can automatically generate suites of plausible tests using Claude Code. If you can make as a rule "no AI for tests", then you can simply make the rule "no AI" or just learn to cope with it.
278.
by catigula 10mo ago
>LLMs are like a eager sycophantic intern how completely changes their personality from conversation to conversation Again, this isn't really true with some recent models. Some have the opposite problem.
279.
by catigula 10mo ago
This is partly true, partly false, partly false in the opposite direction, with various new models. You really need to keep updating and have tons of interactions regularly in order to speak intelligently on this topic.
280.
by catigula 10mo ago
Claude doesn't really have this problem.
281.
by catigula 11mo ago
Anthropic, the corporation we're talking about.
282.
by catigula 11mo ago
Non-developers shouldn't be trying to maintain code. Developing products as if they can is very disingenuous.
283.
by catigula 11mo ago
Regardless, presenting AI generated content without the disclaimer *I AI GENERATED THIS CONTENT. IF YOU THINK MY MOST LIKELY BRIEF AND LOW-EFFORT PROMPT JUSTIFIES YOU READING POTENTIALLY LARGE AMOUNTS OF AI OUTPUT, CONTINUE* as if it's
284.
by catigula 11mo ago
By having native English language proficiency and an IQ above 100. This isn't even particularly good slop. If you can't identify this, we're entering a not so good space. Anyhow, I'd recommend you roll away from this hil
285.
by catigula 11mo ago
1. I determined the post was AI myself. The detector was merely to satisfy someone disingenuously asking for "proof". 2. This one works. It's peer-reviewed.
286.
by catigula 11mo ago
This seems contrary to their stated goal to prioritize AI safety. It is against the law to prioritize AI safety if you run a public company. You must prioritize profits for your shareholders.
287.
by catigula 11mo ago
I don't get the whole 'cloud' thing for AI agents. It feels forced. Who is actually using these services?
288.
by catigula 11mo ago
You aren't being punished, nobody is forcing you to run for Congress.
289.
by catigula 11mo ago
We don't do that.
290.
by catigula 11mo ago
He means capturing things that benchmarks don't. You can use Claude and GPT-5 back-to-back in a field that score nearly identically on. You will notice several differences. This is the "vibe".
291.
by catigula 11mo ago
This is why I stopped bothering checking out these models and, funnily enough, grok.
292.
by catigula 11mo ago
They're pouring money to disrupt American AI markets and efforts. They do this in countless other fields. It's a model of massive state funding -> give it away for cut-rate -> dominate the market -> reap the rewards. It&#
293.
by catigula 11mo ago
To push back on naivety I'm sensing here I think it's a little silly to see Chinese Communist Party backed enterprise as somehow magnanimous and without ulterior, very harmful motive.
294.
by catigula 11mo ago
They are going to be used.
295.
by catigula 11mo ago
NSA datasets. Did your eye catch on the “genesis” project?
296.
by catigula 11mo ago
Source? Everyone at anthropic is saying ASI is imminent…
297.
by catigula 11mo ago
I don’t think the models are smart at all. I can have a speculative debate with any model about any topic and they commit egregious errors with an extremely high density. They are, however, very good at things we’re very bad at.
298.
by catigula 11mo ago
"Everyone except for me is an -ist. I'm an enlightened non-ist."
299.
by catigula 11mo ago
AFAIK this was fake news. Plenty of screenshots flying making many claims about the intentions of all kinds of people, Israelis, Indians, Nigerians, etc.
300.
by catigula 11mo ago
Focusing on meta doing this is fine, but misses the mark. Every tech company is harming the public for profits.

More ›