catigula

16 ms·

301.
by catigula 11mo ago
I constructed a direct falsification of the implicit premise, that capital allocation inherently produces good outcomes for individuals by competing well in the market. Whether or not you agree with my “perfect information” assertion is bes
302.
by catigula 11mo ago
I wouldn’t contend that it’s interesting or not that, or even if , “you” perceive the “inner processings of your own mind”. Re: qualia. Let’s put it aside briefly. It isn’t inconceivable that a system could construct representations that d
303.
by catigula 11mo ago
It’s not so much that there’s anything mysterious you can discover through intense introspection or meditation. There might be, but I haven’t found it. It’s fundamentally that this capability exists at all. Strip it all down to I think ther
304.
by catigula 11mo ago
The perfect information consumer knows Tik Tok doom scrolling, while pleasurable in the short term, actually hurts them in the long term, so that is, of course, a very unpopular application.
305.
by catigula 11mo ago
I generally regard thinking about consciousness, unfortunately, a thing of madness. "I think consciousness will remain a mystery. Yes, that's what I tend to believe... I tend to think that the workings of the conscious brain will
306.
by catigula 11mo ago
FWIW I have gone from not understanding the problem to understanding the problem in the past couple of years because it's not trivial to casually intuit if you don't actually think about it and don't find it innately interest
307.
by catigula 11mo ago
>Cars: “The thing about automakers is that making cars safe is expensive. So they have an incentive to make unsafe cars.” It took a lot of wrangling to get them to be safe. They were coffins on wheels for decades.
308.
by catigula 11mo ago
That’s all very silly and unnecessary in my opinion. Agentic change by change diffs are optimal for a professional.
309.
by catigula 11mo ago
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/edge Nothing in there about chromium.
310.
by catigula 11mo ago
My purposeful caveat was 'software professionals', i.e. user in the loop engineering. Codex is much better at slinging slop that you later need to spend some time reviewing if you actually want to understand it.
311.
by catigula 11mo ago
Which is a bit odd given that Claude code extension in VSCode is by far the best agent integration into a codebase that I know of.
312.
by catigula 11mo ago
The problem with experiencing LLM releases nowadays is that it is no longer trivial to understand the differences in their vast intelligences so it takes awhile to really get a handle on what's even going on.
313.
by catigula 11mo ago
Claude is still a better agent for software professionals though it is less capable, so there isn't nothing to having the incumbent advantage.
314.
by catigula 11mo ago
That would be great! But AI is a bubble if these models can’t do serious engineering work.
315.
by catigula 11mo ago
I know this is a little controversial but the lack of performance on SWE-bench is hugely disappointing I think economically. These models don’t have any viable path to profitability if they can’t take engineering jobs.
316.
by catigula 11mo ago
Who might that be exactly? (It's tongue-in-cheek about the nature of CEOs and specifically OpenAI).
317.
by catigula 11mo ago
>Our 4.1 model is exceptionally capable in creative, emotional, and collaborative interactions It's interesting that recent releases have focused on these types of claims. I hope, and don't generally think, we're not reach
318.
by catigula 11mo ago
>This story was based on more than 30 interviews Yikes
319.
by catigula 11mo ago
It takes about 2-3 years of experience in current enterprise scale to deeply realize that inheritance fundamentally doesn't work.
320.
by catigula 11mo ago
It’s a conspiracy. Even employees from OpenAI say anthropic’s stance on things is quite clearly sincere. They literally exist because they were unhappy with ai safety at OpenAI. It’s not just a conspiracy, it’s a dumb and harmful one.
321.
by catigula 11mo ago
“Colored”?
322.
by catigula 11mo ago
They’re doing all kinds of things.
323.
by catigula 11mo ago
The fact that the cops will show up to a jewelry heist after the diamonds are stolen isn’t a deterrent.
324.
by catigula 11mo ago
Does the fact that you can arbitrarily “jailbreak” AI with increasingly sophisticated abilities ring any alarm bells? Imagine being able to “jailbreak” nuclear warheads. If this were the case, nobody would develop or deploy them.
325.
by catigula 11mo ago
It’s not that this is a crazy reach; it’s actually quite a dumb one. Too little pay off, way too much risk. That’s your framework for assessing conspiracies.
326.
by catigula 11mo ago
Probably not the best idea rhetorically to pick something people literally require to live and compare it against AI spending to make your point.
327.
by catigula 11mo ago
>The project will create approximately 800 permanent jobs For $50 billion? I think there's a serious problem here.
328.
by catigula 11mo ago
Nearly any product you can buy from Amazon, even when it says shipped from Amazon, is suspect. I wouldn't shop there at all. It's a literal scam market. Allegedly.
329.
by catigula 11mo ago
> If you fundamentally believe intelligence is solely linked to genetics Strawman argument. I never said that. >This is widely disputed. No, it isn’t. You can plot ashkenazi Jews on a pct chart and their cluster is much tighter than t
330.
by catigula 11mo ago
That’s actually a correct belief. That’s what the testing says. Note that I’m not saying the cause, merely that’s simply what the testing indicates and is a statement with a pure basis in fact. There are different group averages in intellig

More ›