Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bryanbuckley
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
31.
▲
by
bryanbuckley
8y ago
> the enginners implementing these schemes must surely realize it's in vain I wonder, if it is so "in vain", why have so many folks been so spooked by it (e.g. Stallman, Doctorow)? Are they worried about the needless incr
32.
▲
by
bryanbuckley
8y ago
Depends how you define 100%. e.g. over/under-clocking a CPU.
33.
▲
by
bryanbuckley
9y ago
Accuracy depends on some sort of match between host face and desired face. In this example, the host face was the cgi face which is obviously already very close to the desired face. If filming from scratch and skipping cgi, you need to pick
34.
▲
by
bryanbuckley
9y ago
Your question is a bit too vague. TrustZone by itself doesn't really give you anything. For instance, by default you run everything w/ TrustZone bit set unless you do something different during boot. In general, I would say TrustZ
35.
▲
by
bryanbuckley
9y ago
Because actually I did't understand until I was about to post the comment with just the first question, at which point I thought to myself OP might mean venomous! There are poisonous animals out there that you really should not eat! Bu
36.
▲
by
bryanbuckley
9y ago
TIL! Much thanks. Are you sure this (buy at best price in my favor) is how it is implemented commonly (e.g. the limit order is not just rejected for being an invalid liquidity maker order?)? I guess it is the Fill-or-Kill that is key; I sup
37.
▲
by
bryanbuckley
9y ago
I rarely trade but have enough times to learn the various types of orders one might place, order books, spread, and a few other things. Why doesn't an order type exist like: > "I'll pay the number shown, or something clos
38.
▲
by
bryanbuckley
9y ago
Don't think any exchanges allow you to email them your private key to credit your trading account :(
39.
▲
by
bryanbuckley
9y ago
Why would anyone be afraid of poisonous spiders? Do they crawl into your mouth while you are sleeping? Ah, you probably mean venomous?
40.
▲
by
bryanbuckley
9y ago
You don't need the password for an OS upgrade?!
41.
▲
by
bryanbuckley
9y ago
AMD PSP is an ARM core. Running some derivative of Trustonic OS (based on L4), if I'm not mistaken.
42.
▲
by
bryanbuckley
9y ago
Guess OMAP division was too expensive for them back in the day? A shame.
43.
▲
by
bryanbuckley
9y ago
Gallon of whole milk was $3.50 at Whole Foods in Berkeley yesterday. A welcome sight indeed. I also noticed butter prices were very discounted so picked up an extra brick. From one milk lover to another, what's your favorite and additi
44.
▲
by
bryanbuckley
9y ago
Could be the drive slowing.. but definitely a big chunk of loss of performance comes from OS updates (i.e. that were not tested on the now old device for performance and battery discharge rate as aggressively as initial release)
45.
▲
by
bryanbuckley
9y ago
Most likely the best you'll get is either a fully usable TrustZone SoC (so you can have your bootloader or linux do what you want) or there are SKUs of SoC where the ROM locks the various TZ registers into certain configurations which
46.
▲
by
bryanbuckley
9y ago
There is a reply to that comment that more or less confirms that's at least part of the issue (i.e. Trustonic owns the rights).
47.
▲
by
bryanbuckley
9y ago
> But why is it shoved into everybody, and impossible to turn off? I suspect business reasons? Or lack of demand? Maybe some of the same reasons it's not open source even though there is no reason it shouldn't be? Why can'
48.
▲
by
bryanbuckley
9y ago
Obviously not. Except when it can. (joke..) You can google around for secure boot, trusted boot, chain of trust, etc. Breaking secure boot is the biggest vulnerability a device can experience (e.g. Apple will pay you the most money for this
49.
▲
by
bryanbuckley
9y ago
Yes exactly. Just like servers. There just needs to be a big lawsuit, or law, or something, to make it clear that owners of a device shall have real ownership of that device (i.e. be able to have your own boot keys and capability to disable
50.
▲
by
bryanbuckley
9y ago
Seems like a catch-22 of adoption. Not worth the effort to develop on unless it is ubiquitous enough? I'm sure there will be growing (security) pains as well. Also not sure exactly how AMD allows development for the PSP (specific vendo
51.
▲
by
bryanbuckley
9y ago
I suppose it would be like RV parks in a superficial sense of vans parking and paying a fee. However, I would suggest catering to car/van dweller minimalists, that don't have the features of an RV, by offering high quality, useful
52.
▲
by
bryanbuckley
9y ago
Walmart parking lots pale in comparison to what I'm suggesting. If you are a Google employee already, a Google parking lot is pretty darn good but still not as good as what I'm suggesting. Sure, if you are on a road-trip and in a
53.
▲
by
bryanbuckley
9y ago
Doesn't strike me as very creative. Sounds like Google should be talking with their van-dwelling employees to seek a better solution. Would be great to open up a van-dwellers Mecca to the public as well. I've thought about doing i
54.
▲
by
bryanbuckley
9y ago
agreed on land (to an extant, I think a digital contract would be a good legal basis if things go to court), but what about virtual land? Or digital tokens that control access to things like a house, car, logins, etc for that matter? Now mu
55.
▲
by
bryanbuckley
9y ago
Does it suggest that leadoff guys will be cheaper in the future? The next moneyball trend will be fast guys who can accurately place hits?
56.
▲
by
bryanbuckley
9y ago
Was there an answer to the question in the title? Just better analytics on the offensive side of things? They mention Oakland A's value approach in getting players. Clearly wouldn't have been a good choice for Ichiro..
57.
▲
by
bryanbuckley
10y ago
I work on security software that is embedded in many devices, which allows for DRM use-cases. First off, there is no good reason (well, other than typical business reasons) of keeping the stuff closed source. The only thing really needing s
58.
▲
by
bryanbuckley
10y ago
Depends on the HW manufacturer and SKU on what is bundled or not.. Even ROM code can be different per SKU.
59.
▲
by
bryanbuckley
10y ago
Agreed. Apple's vertical integration is really nice here. As an Android OEM it's tough to have to consider all the trade-offs between different HW vendors (best HW for battery/performance may not be so great for security or s
60.
▲
by
bryanbuckley
10y ago
It's cool but note that you would never be saving secrets in cleartext to disk.
More ›