brutal_chaos_

4 ms·

1.
by brutal_chaos_ 6mo ago
What was your prompt for the image? Apologies if this should be obvious.
2.
by brutal_chaos_ 6mo ago
Hey, wanna potential future at something amazong while you work for free (basically)? /s I love that NASA is hiring, I worry this is because NASA doesn't have funding.
3.
by brutal_chaos_ 6mo ago
BattleEye kernel module in 3 2...
4.
by brutal_chaos_ 7mo ago
I believe it's a bit more nuanced than that. Both democrats and republicans have had enough power to make meaningful changes to prevent such a wealth gap and thus the wealthy play both parties. I do see democrats trying to help people
5.
by brutal_chaos_ 8mo ago
To be fair, you don't need to slay giants to be a viable product.
6.
by brutal_chaos_ 8mo ago
For forms of income. E.g. with paid apps/gadgets/tools for everyday use (outside of dev tools) with chatgpt embedded.
7.
by brutal_chaos_ 8mo ago
These comments: Citations needed
8.
by brutal_chaos_ 8mo ago
> What else were you expecting? some of us were hoping for actual innovation, not more ads
9.
by brutal_chaos_ 9mo ago
The article has an upfront agenda-so at least it's honest in some regard?
10.
by brutal_chaos_ 9mo ago
they can give the tv powers to autoconnect to public/open networks and can partner with companies like Comcast to get more access points. It's best not to buy a smart TV
11.
by brutal_chaos_ 10mo ago
Why does it need to be on the web? Maybe I've missed something, can I run this locally?
12.
by brutal_chaos_ 11mo ago
See the Socument Management section from the link you provided > Create, edit and share documents, spreadsheets and presentations with full support for all major file formats.
13.
by brutal_chaos_ 11mo ago
Take a look at the Document Management section on that page > Create, edit and share documents, spreadsheets and presentations with full support for all major file formats.
14.
by brutal_chaos_ 11mo ago
Having experienced AI at $job and having tried to make vibecodong a thing, run when you see it. Yes, that means good enough AI gets through, what's the harm in that if it works as you need it to?
15.
by brutal_chaos_ 1y ago
I think we gotta hacker https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2OYNMO_mNw (first 20-30sec)
16.
by brutal_chaos_ 1y ago
If you click to skip over, even clicking every minute, you're still not grabbing the whole thing, right? Whereas downloading is grabbing every second.
17.
by brutal_chaos_ 1y ago
Wouldn't that mean everyone owns it then (wrt copyright)? Not just the generator and Anthropic?
18.
by brutal_chaos_ 1y ago
https://www.copyright.gov/ai/ In the US, at least, the works generated by "AI" are not copyrightable. So for my layman's understanding, they may claim ownership, but it means nothing wrt copyright. (thou
19.
by brutal_chaos_ 1y ago
So more middlemen to make the cunsumer pay even more, joy.
20.
by brutal_chaos_ 1y ago
It's loosely explained deep down in the article.
21.
by brutal_chaos_ 1y ago
> The article doesn't mention how spicy his OnlyFans account is, but I'm assuming his OF content is such that it would be hard to argue it doesn't qualify as "indecent" or "immoral." What is indecent o
22.
by brutal_chaos_ 1y ago
Practically, anything besides what Schumer does?
23.
by brutal_chaos_ 1y ago
You bring up some good points. I guess I was too absolute in my statement as I didn't intend to imply it was the only problem. Given that, Windows gaining ads (nevermind the number of settings panels/windows, etc), games being rel
24.
by brutal_chaos_ 1y ago
Good enough is how everything went to shit (enshitification). "It's an MVP? Good enough, ship it and bolt on features no one wants." Personally, I am very tired of "good enough." I wish we built great things.
25.
by brutal_chaos_ 1y ago
Get ready to see a lot more hotfixes...
26.
by brutal_chaos_ 1y ago
I can see where you may get that idea, but I believe the point was supposed to be: just because it is done, it doesn't mean you can do it too. And that also doesn't mean it's ok for corporations to do it, they just have an ea
27.
by brutal_chaos_ 1y ago
True, but it's still a bet, no?
28.
by brutal_chaos_ 1y ago
Can you all help me understand this argument? We have stats upon stats to help us predict outcomes in sports and we call that betting. We have stats upon stats to help us predict outcomes in elections, but we can't call that betting? I
29.
by brutal_chaos_ 1y ago
Just a tiny nit, 10x more of 0 is still 0. Your point still makes sense though
30.
by brutal_chaos_ 2y ago
You may enter our site iff you use software we approve. Anything else will be seen as malicious. Papers please! I, too, am saddened by this gatekeeping. IIUC custom browsers (or user-agent) from scratch will never work on cloudflare sites a

More ›