blueprint

9 ms·

61.
by blueprint 2y ago
instantly downvoted lol
62.
by blueprint 2y ago
have a look at something called structural dissociation theory. there's a PhD Janina Fisher, who is some thing of a genius using it in treatment. It's a known trauma symptom.
63.
by blueprint 2y ago
Anyone know how this would play with at-rest encryption extensions?
64.
by blueprint 2y ago
because they're oh so disturbing the same reason why so many other disturbing things go unstudied like certain risks to our survival, for example i think it's a vuln humans have
65.
by blueprint 2y ago
Yeah I mean if they have nothing to hide why did they evolve shapeshifting
66.
by blueprint 2y ago
I bet it cloaks.
67.
by blueprint 2y ago
What if the nature of consciousness is you can't falsify any proper definition of it? Would you reject its possible correctness? Sounds like a blind spot - perhaps the only one you have left?
68.
by blueprint 2y ago
no self is still a self the diamond sutra's point aiui is that what we call a self isnt a self in that a true self does not exist independently (from the causes, such as its essential nature, its foundation, and its environment) i migh
69.
by blueprint 2y ago
> It’s all part of one of the central themes that accumulating merit is for the phenomenal world and ultimately meaningless for the transcendent. I feel confused about something. Even though you've read the prajnaparamita sutra and
70.
by blueprint 2y ago
independent doesnt say it's not an object
71.
by blueprint 2y ago
especially as combined with Buddha's explanation in his subsequent Lotus Sutra that he realized he was like the father of all beings, I find the recent discovery of treatment for structural dissociation and parts work to be a highly in
72.
by blueprint 2y ago
wait til you read the lotus sutra. you'll find out what maha yana means.
73.
by blueprint 2y ago
because merit is not to be seen by signs. that's the whole point and what makes it so cosmic scale. may i suggest moving onto the lotus sutra. it will clarify some stuff.
74.
by blueprint 2y ago
> People who don’t see their nature and try to stop their thinkings all the time are great sinful poeple and fools. They will fall into the Memoryless-Emptiness. They’re like drunks. They cannot tell good from evil. If you intend to prac
75.
by blueprint 2y ago
he was an alcoholic who popularized words he didn't understand - he took the above from the diamond scripture, clearly and Watts doesn't say much in answer my question - but rather guided people towards self-loss (after which he d
76.
by blueprint 2y ago
ok but what does it mean for anything to "happen"?
77.
by blueprint 2y ago
surprised not to have found any reference to structural dissociation theory here https://janinafisher.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/structur... https://a.co/d/7UOPYoR
78.
by blueprint 2y ago
downvoted? was my argument too accurate? if this is where the smartest people hang out, humanity is clearly ill.
79.
by blueprint 2y ago
tell that to the species we caused to go extinct
80.
by blueprint 2y ago
Too bad this one never took off - it looked amazing at the time https://www.theverge.com/2017/8/3/16082864/treble-fm-social-...
81.
by blueprint 2y ago
naive or crazy- I'll let you choose :p
82.
by blueprint 2y ago
no, not to my eyes. you said, > at some point we decided all that was ok > At some point we decided to elect people who would turn against us > At some point we decided we don’t care about right and wrong, All of those things are a
83.
by blueprint 2y ago
> But it does seem like it's still very widely used, so I assume there must be something about it people really like. this is very dangerous and flawed reasoning. There are many examples of where this goes horribly wrong. One of the
84.
by blueprint 2y ago
this actually sounds like the sort of thing they might do if some master key that they were storing for some subset of accounts was internally breached, and they had to force a password reset on them.
85.
by blueprint 2y ago
that has nothing to do with it. There are a ton of React implementations, some by third parties, that are not complex. React has also changed majorly multiple times. I don't know how experienced you are, but that should tell you someth
86.
by blueprint 2y ago
Vue is vanilla JS - it is a construct of vanilla JS - so it is not what I'm talking about when we talk about generations of languages etc. You still interact with it procedurally or imperatively. Overall, Vue is honest. React is deci
87.
by blueprint 2y ago
that's not even true, but I hate to break it to you, but literally every generation of language involves handling events unless you get into constraint systems which, as I mention, are for people who dont want to use the greater capabi
88.
by blueprint 2y ago
it's the same thing. and you still have to manually sync to the exact same degree using these frameworks or not. state setting is part of the von neumann architecture itself so it appears directly in all programming languages you use.
89.
by blueprint 2y ago
your only problem with events is you dont know how to write code that remains simple react and view frameworks arent the solution to that problem. react isnt even reactive - you still have to deal with event -> repaint. react only tried
90.
by blueprint 2y ago
Like I said, I was not involved at all in bringing the patriot act into existence and no one gave feedback on it. And it looks like almost literally every single person who doesn't want it to be an existence has absolutely no say about

More ›