Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bduerst
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
55 ms
·
511.
▲
by
bduerst
6y ago
That's why bots now mimic users beyond user agents, even going so far as loading page assets and javascript. Unless you're using something like recaptcha V3, it's going to be difficult to detect them, and even that requires
512.
▲
by
bduerst
6y ago
Not sure about dark patterns, but you're talking about magnitudes of tens if not hundreds of thousands of visitors here. Increasing conversion rate by even a few percentage points has huge revenue implications.
513.
▲
by
bduerst
6y ago
They may put it under their Oculus brand.
514.
▲
by
bduerst
6y ago
You still didn't answer the question.
515.
▲
by
bduerst
6y ago
Even those types of authority systems can be gamed as well, unless you're also building your own recaptcha pattern analyzer too. The problem with decentralization is that it creates a power vaccuum that is filled by the most interested
516.
▲
by
bduerst
6y ago
That's fair, though app disruption is more impactful - kind of like how websites went down for SOPA.
517.
▲
by
bduerst
6y ago
Oh no it's spot on. You own your phone, so you own the hardware that houses the store, yet the previous owner is still getting exclusivity inside the property you just purchased. And forceably taking a cut from their competition as yo
518.
▲
by
bduerst
6y ago
Which is fine - that's still the consumer's choice. It's a bit different if Costco took away that choice. Even then it's not the same because you don't own the Costco store like you own your phone.
519.
▲
by
bduerst
6y ago
An app shutdown day would be more appropos. Easier to coordinate a deployment for, and affects all users, not just installing one. It would also allow you to control the messaging users see when they open your app and it only loads the wal
520.
▲
by
bduerst
6y ago
The phone is the store in your analogy. You own it. It is yours, yet you do not expect the previous owner to still forceably control the shelf space of your own store. Or exclusively take from your cash register.
521.
▲
by
bduerst
6y ago
You aren't buying the Costco store when you enter, just as you aren't paying a membership fee to use someone else's phone as your own. Members don't own Costco, Costco owns Costco, so Costco can dictate it's own she
522.
▲
by
bduerst
6y ago
A tattoo of just 1488, without any racist symbology, is ambiguous. There is nothing to make it distinctive from any other number. Help me understand what you think an ambigous tattoo of 1488 should look like?
523.
▲
by
bduerst
6y ago
Bestbuy doesn't charge you hundreds of dollars to buy the store before you walk in. Consumers don't own Bestbuy, Bestbuy owns Bestbuy, so it's okay for Bestbuy to control the shelf space in their own stores. It is not okay fo
524.
▲
by
bduerst
6y ago
It's hard because most analogies fall apart when you look at the users having already paid hundreds of dollars just for the hardware up front. You could compare it to Costco, where you have to pay just to get into the store, where Cost
525.
▲
by
bduerst
6y ago
What are the downsides of going PWA? Non-native support? Offline usage?
526.
▲
by
bduerst
6y ago
>Sure, but I don't see any major downsides in having to add IAP Technical debt, added complexity, additional user support, the overhead of having forked subscriptions in the userbase...
527.
▲
by
bduerst
6y ago
Consumers have already purchased the store, but Apple is still controlling all the shelves inside, and the cash register.
528.
▲
by
bduerst
6y ago
https://imgur.com/Z8AICes Plenty of ambiguity there. I think you may need to evaluate what your motivation is to need to keep disbelieving that racist dogwhistles can actually be ambiguous, especially considering they ar
529.
▲
by
bduerst
6y ago
Just FYI - Brexit killed the St. Kitts/Nevis loophole for EU passports, since their association with the EU was through the U.K.
530.
▲
by
bduerst
6y ago
In the U.S. E.U. does not require a dominant market share to fine companies for monopolistic behavior.
531.
▲
by
bduerst
6y ago
This boils down to semantics: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/monopolist.asp >In many jurisdictions, such as the United States, there are laws restricting monopolies. Being the sole or dominant player in a
532.
▲
by
bduerst
6y ago
Even though it was quarantined, the mods eventually killed it themselves by restricting who can post. It's likely they're trying to move the userbase to another subreddit.
533.
▲
by
bduerst
6y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overton_window
534.
▲
by
bduerst
6y ago
Who loses when Apple doesn't allow other payment systems on it's phones?
535.
▲
by
bduerst
6y ago
Anti-competitive behavior is different than typical growth operations.
536.
▲
by
bduerst
6y ago
Do you really think the president was using a symbol from Utrecht Netherlands in a U.S. based political ad?
537.
▲
by
bduerst
6y ago
1. This is the antifa symbol: https://imgur.com/0S81Ht6 2. The president did not use the symbol you linked. 3. Focusing on the antifa symbol used in the city of Utrecht, Netherlands is the definition of cherry picking. The
538.
▲
by
bduerst
6y ago
The point isn't that it's been referenced politically before. Act Up intentionally upended the symbol as an act of defiance, the same way you would upend a flag. The symbol in the president's ad is used as is, with an inten
539.
▲
by
bduerst
6y ago
- The ad in question: https://imgur.com/NQuGvDo - Nazi concentration camp symbols explained: https://imgur.com/8xo1Bv2 Associating leftist organizations with this fascist political symbol is almost guarante
540.
▲
by
bduerst
6y ago
>You can't have monopolistic behavior without a monopoly This is wrong. Monopolistic behavior is anti-competitive behavior that doesn't require having a market monopoly. Think of it as a pattern of behavior that moves you towa
More ›