asdasf

18 ms·

121.
by asdasf 13y ago
Certifications? No, the whole "certified bullshit expert" thing started with XP. Before that people just did their jobs and didn't invent religious practices that had to be adhered to in order to do so.
122.
by asdasf 13y ago
No, then you have a benchmark that is useless for 99.999999999999999999% of people whose website does not get hundreds of simultaneous requests, much less tens of thousands.
123.
by asdasf 13y ago
Jruby?
124.
by asdasf 13y ago
The benefits are too big to ignore? Would you mind letting me in on the secret then? The only benefit I see in go is fast compilation. That is hardly big enough to justify using such a primitive language.
125.
by asdasf 13y ago
I was pretty shocked to see a programmer that delusional about XP and its influence. Then I got to the bottom and saw it was an XP snake-oil salesman writing it, not a programmer. Surprise. All 12 of those things predate XP, and most of
126.
by asdasf 13y ago
>The more meta-programming that a language allows, the more its functions will tend to be composable Where are you coming up with that notion? Clojure's composability comes from being functional, not from meta-programming. >The
127.
by asdasf 13y ago
Fortune 500 has little to no relation to demanding website. Plenty of fortune 500 companies aren't even in the top 1000 busiest sites.
128.
by asdasf 13y ago
Nobody said anything about "IT guy", he said "IT". A field, not a person.
129.
by asdasf 13y ago
Ok, but your perception of IT as desktop support doesn't change reality.
130.
by asdasf 13y ago
Wait, so people think "IT" means desktop support? Network architect is IT. Sysadmins, network admins, "devops" (remember when they were called sysadmins?) are all IT.
131.
by asdasf 13y ago
>Watch out for IT. IT for people without a degree is a trap. What do you mean? You just talked about being in IT without a degree.
132.
by asdasf 13y ago
Have you ever tried using them before? You can set your search path, you don't need to type out schema.table. Your objects are already in a schema anyways, it isn't like you type out public.table all the time. What are these &q
133.
by asdasf 13y ago
>But schemas are a YAGNI 99% of the time feature in those. What? I literally have only ever written one web app that didn't use multiple schemas, and that was a simple blog. I think you are confusing "I don't bother to u
134.
by asdasf 13y ago
Is what that bad, lift or its relevance? Lift is no worse than it ever was, I feel it was pretty much terrible outside of templates. Nobody uses it because the community around it is so terrible and the official scala people labeled play
135.
by asdasf 13y ago
He isn't really relevant in the scala community any more, the burden is decreasing, not increasing. Nobody uses lift, nobody talks about lift, nobody cares about lift. Play is the scala framework now.
136.
by asdasf 13y ago
Not that you need to fit into everything in either list. For example, I strongly prefer static typing (haskell guy) and I still prefer clojure over scala.
137.
by asdasf 13y ago
>The link you quoted directly states that the quality of grain protein is relatively very poor and limited by lysine content Which is why it is corrected rather than reporting 1:1 like with proteins that are close to an ideal ratio. Tha
138.
by asdasf 13y ago
He used haskell for some startup thing he was doing, but he didn't abandon scala or lift.
139.
by asdasf 13y ago
Efficiency of what? You need X protein. They provide far more than X. There is absolutely no problem with their protein source. The fact that they could use slightly less raw ingredient to get there doesn't matter if that other ing
140.
by asdasf 13y ago
Why respond if you don't bother to read what you respond to? Lysine is the lowest in rice. It is not absent. You therefore get "complete protein" up to the amount of lysine available. You absolutely do not need to combi
141.
by asdasf 13y ago
You do discover the macros from the label, that's the point. They measure usable protein, not amino acids. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protein_Digestibility_Corrected...
142.
by asdasf 13y ago
But there aren't a bunch of products that are pretty close or better, that's the point. The only 100% complete nutrition products are medical products for tube feeding, and they are expensive.
143.
by asdasf 13y ago
>it's 25% of everything listed, if I remember correctly You don't. If you tried to live on ensure complete (which they seem to only sell in the US?) you need to add potassium, choline, more fat, more calories in general, more
144.
by asdasf 13y ago
>Ensure has been used as a complete replacement for decades No, it has not. An ensure contains a mere 11% of your daily potassium for example. Has anyone ever actually recommended that someone drink 9 ensures a day?
145.
by asdasf 13y ago
You were proven wrong in the 70s. Your understanding of protein is effectively nonexistent. Rice protein contains all essential amino acids. You do not need to combine it with anything. You simply need to eat enough of it so that you ge
146.
by asdasf 13y ago
Wow, where to start. You are seriously repeating the protein combining myth? In 2013? Protein is measured by scaling its amino acid profile compared to the ideal for a human. 100g of rice protein provides 100g of usable protein for a hu
147.
by asdasf 13y ago
No, that is not one. That is the whole point. Look at the label, you would need to eat 29 scoops of that per day to get your daily potassium. It doesn't even mention all the vitamins and minerals we know we need. That is not a bala
148.
by asdasf 13y ago
>"Cloud" isn't about external hosting Yes it is. You represent the internet as a cloud on shitty visio diagrams. That is where putting stuff "in the cloud" comes from.
149.
by asdasf 13y ago
Are many people using so few aws services that they are able to move to google? It seems like a hassle to use google for VMs and file storage, while having to still use amazon for all the other services google doesn't offer.
150.
by asdasf 13y ago
You pay for another hour every time you do that, that was the point.

More ›