Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
aroch
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
83 ms
·
811.
▲
by
aroch
13y ago
I'd say the point is mostly that those big, scary sounding chemical names you see in products that "Organic" companies like to point to really aren't scary at all.
812.
▲
by
aroch
13y ago
I have, it doesn't seem to help much if at all. I'm not entirely sad, I already tag my emails by contact group and what vhost/catchall they show up at. Strangely, it works fine in my non-GApps email.
813.
▲
by
aroch
13y ago
What exactly is not natural about human-caused selection? As far as the banana is concerned, we're a "predator" that increasingly preys on banana plants which produce fewer seeds but bigger, sweeter ovary. It's a directe
814.
▲
by
aroch
13y ago
Unfortunately, gmail marks everything (well, 99%) as "priority" despite my training it for many months.
815.
▲
by
aroch
13y ago
Their broadcast wasn't malicious, they can't exactly guarantee that the decoding logic baked into the firmware of, what I'm sure, were knockoff-brand cable boxes won't cause something silly to happen.
816.
▲
by
aroch
13y ago
>Plus I've never had a tv ad infect my tv and stop it from going to any other channel but CMT. Funny story...there's a regional sports network who shows a 5-10sec image of their logo at the end of ad-blocks. When the channel wa
817.
▲
by
aroch
13y ago
I, and I'm sure the rest of HN, loves F.lux...but is there a reason why this needs to be posted every month or two? There hasn't even been an update (and the promised OSX update is no where to be seen)
818.
▲
by
aroch
13y ago
Pretty much what Beagle said. Targeted ads on Facebook are the social network equivalent of a spear phishing email. It's trivial to target a very specific set of even just one individual if you've done your research and then follo
819.
▲
by
aroch
13y ago
Well, they went from allowing you to have a private profile (ie. not searchable and non-friends see no info) to making name/age/gender/profpic/email/friends list public. There's quite some evidence that Faceboo
820.
▲
by
aroch
13y ago
If you find yourself with a Terminal window open: alias win7="bless -mount /Volumes/win7/ -legacy -setBoot -nextonly; shutdown -r now" alias debian="bless -mount /Volumes/wheezy/ -leg
821.
▲
by
aroch
13y ago
it is their IP, and it looks like their vaguely-newish home page redesign [0]: http://dns.squish.net/traverses/df9a8b86bde047a12801bc04c96e...
822.
▲
by
aroch
13y ago
If indeed the twitter spewings are correct and they've gained access to the database, I suppose now is the time to see how Dropbox secures passwords and user details.
823.
▲
by
aroch
13y ago
Jeez, the white-knighting on her user:talk page is atrocious... I say good riddance. We don't need paid shills in the WMF and we certainly don't need them writing and reviewing articles. There are enough issues, as is, with idioti
824.
▲
by
aroch
13y ago
The G1 was released as a high-end flagship smartphone to compete with the iPhone. The ZTE FxOS phones are low-end smartphones competing in the feature phone market.
825.
▲
by
aroch
13y ago
Patients are, across the board, pretty rubbish at giving histories. They overlook things because they don't think it relevant or don't want to tell their doctors for some reason (even though it is relevant). This is especially
826.
▲
by
aroch
13y ago
>I’d love to learn more about these secretive industries and the engineers who work in them. Isn't it pretty well known that 1) they aren't secretive and 2) they don't actually design their own hardware. They start off by
827.
▲
by
aroch
13y ago
That doesn't answer the question. Why should more of the people being added to tech be female?
828.
▲
by
aroch
13y ago
No you don't, doing so only breeds more animosity. There's a reason why men get touchy over female hires and promotions that are framed in the context of diversity and women's rights. Hiring or promoting someone primarily for
829.
▲
by
aroch
13y ago
Why would the tech field be better off with more women?
830.
▲
by
aroch
13y ago
Are you genuinely suggesting that every degree should have a 1:1 (or thereabouts) distribution of male and female graduates?
831.
▲
by
aroch
13y ago
IE in wine perhaps
832.
▲
by
aroch
13y ago
I'm not saying it makes sense, but the GP is correct that its not a full port. Also, there are android devices that can take both CD/DVD and eternal cameras, so it isn't too far fetched
833.
▲
by
aroch
13y ago
Well, it is true...if "almost all" the feature but not all of them are ported, then its not "fully ported".
834.
▲
by
aroch
13y ago
>Rape perpetrators are overwhelmingly male. You do realise that, right? No, they really aren't. The majority of "rapes" are institutional (meaning they happen in prisons and other custodial environments) and are perpetr
835.
▲
by
aroch
13y ago
>This is not true at all. In cases where fathers seek custody, they have a good chance of gaining custody or arriving at a shared custody arrangement. ~18% of fathers are the custodial parent. Shared custody favors the mothers in most ci
836.
▲
by
aroch
13y ago
Ha, not even close. Census data shows that of men who wished to have custody, only ~18% gained it.
837.
▲
by
aroch
13y ago
Modern feminists also pushed for the FBI definition of rape which is forced penetration but construed in such a way that it really only covers insertion of a penis. They also pushed for useless laws like rape shields which prevents the accu
838.
▲
by
aroch
13y ago
Show me the strawman?
839.
▲
by
aroch
13y ago
I give 0-shits about how M-W defines that word. Why? Because they until very recently defined rape as an act committed by a man against a women and now have added wiggle-words to their definition to make it seem like a less pejorative aga
840.
▲
by
aroch
13y ago
Really? Because it seems that feminists say men can't take care of children, particularly by so convincing the US judicial system that only women can care for children that it takes extraordinary circumstances for a father to get custo
More ›