andyakb

10 ms·

61.
by andyakb 13y ago
Ok, then I misunderstood the comment. I was thinking they were saying $20 was too much to spend, not that they wish they could get away with only spending $20 per acquistion. Thanks for clarifying!
62.
by andyakb 13y ago
I don't know a ton about your industry, but why can't you spend $20 per customer? I can't imagine your clv is lower than that. Or are you saying you wish you only had to spend that much?
63.
by andyakb 13y ago
...the point is to gets 10s of millions. Simply because they are already making a lot does not mean they should avoid optimizations. If they had that attitude, they would have "stopped" at whatever number was deemed to be enough
64.
by andyakb 13y ago
...this isn't facebook
65.
by andyakb 13y ago
The point of the post is about overall profitability of adwords. An ad's CTR is important to drive as much traffic as possible and also to keep a high quality score, but you arent directly paying for people who do not click your links. Ho
66.
by andyakb 13y ago
This is not how the vast majority of people shop. It seems like you are arguing that changes to a site's design will rarely result in a significant increase to their bottom line, but there are countless case studies that prove the opposite
67.
by andyakb 13y ago
Cash doesn't have a public record of (nearly) all transaction
68.
by andyakb 13y ago
I think the language used to push these needs to be centered around protecting good drivers from all the other bad drivers. "You aren't the problem, they are the problem and these cars are simply able to better anticipate the mistakes ot
69.
by andyakb 13y ago
He didn't "take" their car and do anything with it. He made a lower cost version of one of the systems, but not a fully functioning car. This is hugely impressive, but that doesn't mean the title isn't misleading.
70.
by andyakb 13y ago
choosing the mechanism that made it easier to consume is not beside the point because google didn't have to do that. we know two things; 1, they had to make the source available, 2, they released the source online. We cannot assume they o
71.
by andyakb 13y ago
Do the terms of costcos membership agreement allow them to do this, or did they negotiate a separate agreement?
72.
by andyakb 13y ago
The original point was put quite simply and your "summary" has messages the original didn't. Just seems a weird way of adding your own opinion as when you start with "let me put _your_ point in plain words," you imply that you are still ke
73.
by andyakb 13y ago
Nobody starts brute forcing at "mycat." Even if they somehow knew that's how it started, that barely helps them. They don't know how many other words there are, or what the next one is. Simply because it is more likely to be "my cat like
74.
by andyakb 13y ago
"By definition, new accounts are not "speculators" putting in trades to manipulate the price, they are people putting in trades to acquire their first bitcoins." What definition are you talking about? That sounds exactly like speculation.
75.
by andyakb 13y ago
You can use fractional bitcoins for pricing
76.
by andyakb 13y ago
You dont refute his point at all. There is something inherent to bitcoin that may hamper a "country to convert a great part of this dead stock into active and productive stock;" the fact that you need to take an insane amount of computing
77.
by andyakb 13y ago
How is positive speculation any more admirable?
78.
by andyakb 14y ago
the problem is that you did not base any of your arguments on actual facts. you just said "if you would have invested 5 months ago, your investment would have grown by a factor of 10." when that is the logic presented, the analogy holds.
79.
by andyakb 14y ago
This is not rational thinking. Simply because something has gone up in the past does not mean it will continue to. The returns for the past 5 months have been insane, but that doesnt mean it was a good investment 5 months ago because that
80.
by andyakb 14y ago
That doesn't belong in this discussion. This isn't reddit.
81.
by andyakb 14y ago
Most people suck at negotiating, and in a field where so much value is provided, there is a lot of value that simply isn't captured by the employee. I think having a management company like this makes a lot of sense assuming that after you
82.
by andyakb 14y ago
They own the sites that are displaying those ads and get a share of everything google makes, so their adsense earnings go through the roof
83.
by andyakb 14y ago
If they want to ban somebody, they don't need to make up a fake story and get it in the news, they just ban them
84.
by andyakb 14y ago
In the US, and likely most countries, card counting is not illegal. However, casinos can refuse to do business with anybody they want, so they can ban you for it. The exception is Atlantic City where you can't be banned for card counting,
85.
by andyakb 14y ago
It doesn't literally apply to just the color of the car. A black car is a luxury car, compare it to first class vs coach in airlines
86.
by andyakb 14y ago
Why would you post this? Of course that is what they mean
87.
by andyakb 14y ago
yes, this is the most efficient method for getting market value for something (its almost tautologous); however, thats not the problem identified. the problem is determining a fair price for the ipo so that the company being listed brings
88.
by andyakb 14y ago
it says specifically in the article that it is staying
89.
by andyakb 14y ago
would you mind saying what the herbal supplement was that you ended up using? my girlfriend has a lot of these issues as well and I would like to mention it to her so she could discuss it with her doctor the next time she sees him. thanks
90.
by andyakb 14y ago
testosterone is very frequently prescribed, as is hgh

More ›