Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
adverbly
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
91.
▲
by
adverbly
6mo ago
Thats not the same at all though? A baby or toddler is way less likely to randomly shoot themselves in the head of given a gun than they are to do nothing or shoot something else. The 2 buttons made it 50/50. The odds of random death
92.
▲
by
adverbly
6mo ago
The number of people trying to use game theory here is frankly embarrassing. This is about predicting real people! People are not perfect rational actors. Good luck explaining your Nash equilibrium theory to your 6 month old niece and nephe
93.
▲
by
adverbly
6mo ago
> Nash equilibrium Bro... Game theory laws like Nash equilibrium dont apply if the population is irrational. Which it largely is! Good luck explaining Nash equilibrium to a baby.
94.
▲
by
adverbly
6mo ago
Wait two runners beat it in the same race? Was there perfect conditions.or something? Insane you could run 1:59:41 and not win!
95.
▲
by
adverbly
6mo ago
Is this repeated or one time? Can you force people on red or not? Seems difficult to guarantee you don't kill a bunch of kids each button press cycle... Many people aren't old and developed enough to reason it out yet... If this i
96.
▲
by
adverbly
6mo ago
This has to be fake right? Using LLMs for production systems without a sandbox environment? Having a bulk volume destroy endpoint without an ENV check? Somehow blaming Cursor for any of this rather than either of the above?
97.
▲
by
adverbly
6mo ago
This but for cars This but for TVs This but for robot vacuums This but for security cameras This but for baby monitors This but for washing machines This but for fridges Anyone else got any requests?
98.
▲
by
adverbly
6mo ago
Anecdotally, I've been seeing a higher rate of CVEs tracked by a few dependabot projects. Seems supported by this as well: https://www.first.org/blog/20260211-vulnerability-forecast-2... Interesting that it's
99.
▲
by
adverbly
7mo ago
Are you blind? 2019: 83260 2024: 83730
100.
▲
by
adverbly
7mo ago
> Only rich people will be able to afford land. That's literally the problem Georgism uniquely solves. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgism > rich people often push Georgism Your user was created 8 mi
101.
▲
by
adverbly
7mo ago
> Until I see median real income start to actually go down, I just don't buy it. Assuming you're intending "real" to mean the technical definition of "real" which is "adjusted for inflation", its b
102.
▲
by
adverbly
7mo ago
Seems like if we want to avoid dystopia, our options are: 1. Full-blown socialism 2. Georgism Georgism may have been right all along!
103.
▲
by
adverbly
7mo ago
Step 1B: load up all the tanker vessels carrying the oil onto the helium blimp Two birds, one stone baby! Just hopefully it doesn't get hit by a bird or something...
104.
▲
by
adverbly
7mo ago
This says nothing about where people find enjoyment. I like doing puzzles. I like it more than planning. At the end of the day, I'll do whatever builds the best thing, but I'll enjoy it more or less depending on what that involves
105.
▲
by
adverbly
7mo ago
I have very little pride or shame. It's a superpower. Look like an idiot and you'll learn the fastest!
106.
▲
by
adverbly
7mo ago
Okay that's funny!!! Thanks Meta I needed a laugh!
107.
▲
by
adverbly
7mo ago
Fail fast
108.
▲
by
adverbly
7mo ago
"The engine of X's wealth is blocking its future" is a pretty common theme these days... Pensions, patent/IP law, land ownership crowding out affordability... Birth rate drops dramatically Shocked pikachu face
109.
▲
by
adverbly
8mo ago
Well hopefully this is short, minimally lethal, and leads to regime change for all those involved.
110.
▲
by
adverbly
8mo ago
Done
111.
▲
by
adverbly
8mo ago
Deleted all chats and deleted my account.
112.
▲
by
adverbly
8mo ago
Did this guy actually write this? Incredibly long and verbose. I will fall short of accusing him of using an AI to generate slop, but whatever happened to people's ability to make short, strong, simple arguments? If you can't comm
113.
▲
by
adverbly
8mo ago
How is this not a solved problem already? I'd assume people managing routes do this sort of analysis already. If they don't then sure give this a go in a few places and measure the results. Sounds like its worth a short if we'
114.
▲
by
adverbly
8mo ago
What do we think? Is this possible without AGI level breakthroughs? If we see a continuation or even a slowdown of the current trend, the technology overhang, lagging productization, and catch up from the slow adoption of AI by businesses p
115.
▲
by
adverbly
8mo ago
Seriously! We also suffer from this. Although in some cases it's due to a Dev dependency. It's crazy how much noise it adds specifically from ReDoS...
116.
▲
by
adverbly
8mo ago
This isn't the first time that I've seen interestingness treated like a virtue. Honestly, I like it and agree that it makes a very good virtue. But at the same time, I don't think we have a good enough collective understandin
117.
▲
by
adverbly
8mo ago
Whoa there. Let's not oversimplify in either direction here. My take: 1. AI workflows are faster - saving people time 2. Faster workflows involve people using their brain less 3. Some people use their time savings to use their brain mo
118.
▲
by
adverbly
8mo ago
http://128.237.157.9/pub/ubuntu/ubuntu/ubuntu/ubuntu/ubuntu/...
119.
▲
by
adverbly
9mo ago
I chuckled at that part too! Didn't even open a single one of the papers to look at them! Just said that one is not relevant without even opening it.
120.
▲
by
adverbly
9mo ago
economic productivity is absolutely not nebulous. Its a measure of GDP per hour worked. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/labor-productivity-per-ho...
More ›