adverbly

3 ms·

1.
by adverbly 5d ago
Agree. There are definitely pure MCP use cases. For web apps though, WebMCP seems like an awesome enabler: better ux and better stakeholder alignment
2.
by adverbly 5d ago
> MCP makes all of that so much easier to provide. Easier being the key! Right now it really does feel like early web days where like 5% of the population is adopting things, but most people just get confused and don't participate.
3.
by adverbly 6d ago
In some sense, I can't think of a worse group for this to happen to, but a better group for who might come up with a solution and help humanity forge a new path. I've long been of the opinion that mathematicians are probably the s
4.
by adverbly 7d ago
I find that a bit interesting because the most system one part of the brain is probably the part used for visual processing. It's trying to use a human analogy but the analogy breaks down if you try to apply it directly
5.
by adverbly 7d ago
I'm no crypto expert at all but isn't TRUPPENVERSCHIEBUNG an actual word? Google says it translates to "troops shift" If so, I don't understand how this was difficult at all... Can't you just do a dictionary at
6.
by adverbly 10d ago
Speaking as someone who often tries to reduce my use of reduce by replacing it with map and filter where possible, for me, falling back to reduce is analogous to falling back to a while loop or a for loop: I avoid it if I can. The problem w
7.
by adverbly 14d ago
The world is a restrictive sandbox. You can't avoid laws and safety.
8.
by adverbly 15d ago
Can you also attest to the scaling factor they suggest and that it doesn't have any scaling time benefits? 166 * 40 = 7000ish They say it is 20x that. Do you also agree with that?
9.
by adverbly 15d ago
> formalizing the 166-page paper from OpenAI would take 132,800 person-hours Am I missing something or is this completely out of the ballpark? I must be missing something or the upvote bots are out in force for this one... If this were r
10.
by adverbly 16d ago
I got a bit lost in the comment thread for that article, but I don't understand why LLMs are not considered self referential... They are auto regressive as one of the commenters pointed out, and Scott just sort of waved his hand and sa
11.
by adverbly 17d ago
> AI will never understand why you can’t wear Nike socks with adidas shoes. This sounds like something I will never understand either. Sometimes I wonder if good taste is actually a real thing, or is instead a manufactured perception cre
12.
by adverbly 17d ago
> It's exactly the same as with Chess I think you might be missing my point. My point is that you are probably correct but it is not proven. If the field that requires verification has an increase in difficulty which exceeds the in
13.
by adverbly 18d ago
You can't ask that without giving a definition first
14.
by adverbly 18d ago
> will soon far surpass that of humans To be fair, I think it's still an open question about how far it might surpass human capabilities. I think it's clear that its speed of development will be significantly faster, but it&#x2
15.
by adverbly 22d ago
I also noticed that, and it did bug me. The benchmarks are impressive though. One other thing that bugged me though was that they crop every single plot in some cases the y-axis would show a range between like 40 and 70%. Makes the whole th
16.
by adverbly 26d ago
> Easy to remove See this is where its going too far IMO. When you setup rails, you get far fewer "batteries" by default. Its batteries included, but opt-in to be included. That is totally different from installing an OS and ha
17.
by adverbly 27d ago
Is it really stupid if it means more data centers need to be built and it keeps the AI bubble going and GDP number go up?
18.
by adverbly 28d ago
I say this as a vimium user: Don't make me use a keyboard for drawing. Don't make me use a keyboard for video games. Don't make me use a keyboard for 3D modeling. There are probably many more exceptions. Stop pushing for glob
19.
by adverbly 29d ago
I hate that framing when used politically because it is a complete cop-out. For one: Conservatives don't want to maintain - they often want to "go back". Trump isn't "doing nothing": He's doing way more th
20.
by adverbly 29d ago
> In reality, most people don’t think that deeply about a candidate. > If anyone thought deeply about Trump, we wouldn’t be where we are now. You said it yourself here: The problem is that one side has more people thinking deeply than
21.
by adverbly 1mo ago
At what point does it become a badge of honour to have donald rename something because of you? History is probably gonna look rather kindly on those that hit back during these times. I wonder if it might be a bit like in the 50s or 60s when
22.
by adverbly 1mo ago
> Of course, this is not possible. I keep hearing conflicting answers on this and its a debate I've had with several people. I have aphantasia based on the description here because I don't see jack. Some people I talk to though
23.
by adverbly 1mo ago
> We don’t care for others because they’re conscious. We believe they’re conscious because we care about them Huh? I care deeply about many sentimental objects, but I don't go around saying that my favorite piece of art from my pare
24.
by adverbly 1mo ago
> I don't really have any idea if tariffs are good or bad. tariffs are objectively* bad from a "big picture" perspective. There are some situations where they create winners and losers so that some people in some countries
25.
by adverbly 1mo ago
I would argue that it is the harness's job... Certainly for any harness which is targeting an end user. They don't sell cars without seat belts, and it is the car manufacturer who has to do it. Also, small nitpick but technically
26.
by adverbly 1mo ago
sandboxing?
27.
by adverbly 1mo ago
I love the concept. I'd be happy to see the solution to consumer pain And economic productivity to pass permanently pro productivity and pro consumer policies. Anti monopoly stuff. Maybe a growth policy like land value tax. I'd ne
28.
by adverbly 1mo ago
> My understanding is they are getting hammered with LLM generated code growing their traffic by over an order of magnitude Seems presumptuous to assume a root case while the incident is still ongoing, no?
29.
by adverbly 2mo ago
Surely the well being of the public is in the agency's best interest! Right? Right guys?
30.
by adverbly 2mo ago
Looks like they're stuck between their shady AI dealings and their shady IP dealings. sips tea

More ›