Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
adriancr
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
52 ms
·
631.
▲
by
adriancr
6y ago
Local apps - I can install once and check signature. - I can store them in a backup for later forensics if they do something bad. - I can firewall the process only to required services. - I can disable outside network access for local proce
632.
▲
by
adriancr
6y ago
I'm in europe, unions are mandatory everywhere, some are good, some are not, average just do what the company wants them to, usually the 2-3% raise every year. Unions don't really work for software, high demand, low supply of peop
633.
▲
by
adriancr
6y ago
I know I am compensated fairly and that puts me as top earner for my current country. It is due to demand and offer for my technical skills... I switch or ask for a raise if I get a better offer, anyone can/should do that. It's no
634.
▲
by
adriancr
6y ago
not if the union negotiates upper limits on compensation. Or it negotiates yearly raise brackets. You can negotiate better individually if you are good and there arent union enforced guidelines, if you're not, the union deal would work
635.
▲
by
adriancr
6y ago
> This heavily points to dysfunctional development team with fault being primary on tech leads making more and more mess the more they code. You are correct. > I don't think it fixes the dysfunctional team above, it is just avoid
636.
▲
by
adriancr
6y ago
I've seen the reverse happen at some companies. Managers getting taken advantage of by allowing people to do anything in the name of 'technical debt' 'code quality', resulting in more bugs, lots of needless refactor
637.
▲
by
adriancr
6y ago
There are projects and projects, some I got ignored as well with patch and bug info provided, others reviewed/integrated in a few days (mozilla/rust) or told I was wrong and bugs I reported were fixed another way
638.
▲
by
adriancr
6y ago
what do you use now then and how happy are you with that? I for one am the reverse, tried recently using windows and it just got in the way, plus felt like I was being spied on like old times under communism... Tried last year MacOS/ma
639.
▲
by
adriancr
6y ago
parents messed that up (clicked accept by mistake to a microsoft upgrade pop up when that was a thing), system no longer booted and had to reinstall... Also, I'm old, maybe things have improved but I've had upgrades wipe my hard d
640.
▲
by
adriancr
6y ago
> Yes. Care to share?, I'm curious :) > Which is not a simple task. Why can't keeping old software be simple? It is in sane operating systems. Hell, even Linux can do it right, as AppImage proves, but the Linux Desktop commu
641.
▲
by
adriancr
6y ago
Do you have concrete experience for that? I have only 3 things I hit: - NVIDIA driver updates (or kernel updates while using nvidia) - caused black screen... I dumped nvidia... these are due to crappy nvidia. - Ubuntu deciding to remove old
642.
▲
by
adriancr
6y ago
I know it is important, that and exterior looks of the hardware. Still, I do not have UI issues and the polish is fine on Linux, was explaining how to get there. Problem is people expect a 300$ Linux laptop to work like a mac usually... whe
643.
▲
by
adriancr
6y ago
Well... your choice is: - windows 10 - no privacy, hello telemetry, cortana, etc. - mac os - no freedom to do anything not allowed by apple - Linux - polish / ui issues? At least with Linux once I configure it right it works without is
644.
▲
by
adriancr
6y ago
Lyrics are not produced by the page hosting them, if anything those are a cancer of ads and malware that I steer away from. Google can probably do voice recognition now on songs and get the lyrics without outside parties (see youtube cc whi
645.
▲
by
adriancr
6y ago
Imagine it's 1946 and someone would have made a similar statement regarding nuclear bombs and Russia... Where there are resources problems will get solved.
646.
▲
by
adriancr
6y ago
Not the original purpose of NAT, sure, but it achieves that goal much better then IPv6 Privacy extensions are a hack and still uniquely identify someone even if it changes once a day. NAT hides them all the time. If I have 100 nodes, good l
647.
▲
by
adriancr
6y ago
NAT hides all devices I have in my network from the world. Nobody from the outside will know who made request x from the n devices in the network. NAT is mainly privacy/obfuscation. Can you do that with a firewall? Another use case is
648.
▲
by
adriancr
6y ago
Appending MAC to address is a privacy nightmare and is going away with privacy extensions. (I dont want people to know what NIC i have and potentially track me by looking up who bought it). Because of that DHCP may be needed and ARP as well