adlpz

33 ms·

331.
by adlpz 13y ago
Is this new or undocumented or something? It just looks like a nice feature of Twitter's API, but not specially noteworthy. Care to elaborate?
332.
by adlpz 14y ago
You could ? Then you are definitely caring somewhat.
333.
by adlpz 14y ago
Not related to the content, but this is the most annoying website design I've seen in months.
334.
by adlpz 14y ago
I know, and, if I had the money, I'd do the charity donation. But the parent comment asked about paying in general a large sum to talk to Tim Cook in the context of being an entrepreneur. I understood the charity aspect of it wasn't to be
335.
by adlpz 14y ago
Very much, no. I would never pay $15k so talk to anyone . Having people you look up to is something. This would be senseless idolatry.
336.
by adlpz 14y ago
Well there is the whole fire thing going on too :P
337.
by adlpz 14y ago
Maybe it's because English is not my first language then. Still, you could have thought of IMAP-Powered condoms, that would have been funnier.
338.
by adlpz 14y ago
About labels, I believe they are sort of in the IMAP spec as keywords or something like that, so if Gmail is being nice, they should work. About conversations, I read that Gmail does some client-side sorcery with In-Reply-To headers for tha
339.
by adlpz 14y ago
I really hope people are not that close-minded, seriously... By the way, from the wiki: It's a cool name. What does it mean and how should I pronounce that word? It's a Czech word which means "triple". The meaning is an inside joke related
340.
by adlpz 14y ago
31st Dec 1969 23:59 UTC, Ouch
341.
by adlpz 14y ago
Yeah, that too, really, calling it jabbr... Not very nice.
342.
by adlpz 14y ago
My mind just got blown. For some reason, I never thought of this possibility.
343.
by adlpz 14y ago
Whoa, I don't know which one came first, but this is blatant UI plagiarism right there.
344.
by adlpz 14y ago
Wait what? Have you been to any IRC channel in the last ten years? IRC is a well-supported, still widely used, open standard for real-time communication. It can work just as fine on the browser with any of the hundreds of browser-based IRC
345.
by adlpz 14y ago
I like it, it's useless, but I like useless.
346.
by adlpz 14y ago
Does this mean you need to be a registered Apple Developer (with the ID and all the jazz..)? I can't get to the site to check, it keeps timing out.
347.
by adlpz 14y ago
Of course not, that's an absurd exaggeration.
348.
by adlpz 14y ago
I am not familiar with Textadept. How does this compare with (g)vim or Sublime? It looks rather nice.
349.
by adlpz 14y ago
Oh well, the whole hack/hacking/hacker terminology has been absolute and totally corrupted to oblivion already anyway. I mean, this site is called Hacker News and we come here to read about where to sit in a conference room.
350.
by adlpz 14y ago
There is a point where it is reasonable, there is a point where it is not. Look, a complete X graphical environment with one bash line! $ startx
351.
by adlpz 14y ago
My point is that the title is not really useful. Something along the lines of 'Using the Scapy library for wireless packet inspection' would be more reasonable. All this 'whatever with N lines' articles when you are using a 200MB tool stack
352.
by adlpz 14y ago
It's like they are not even trying anymore...
353.
by adlpz 14y ago
> A 10 Line Wi-Fi SSID Sniffer > from scapy.all import * Yeah.
354.
by adlpz 14y ago
Doesn't seem to do anything with a Nexus 7. And it does have an accelerometer and gyroscope.
355.
by adlpz 14y ago
The point here is that we used to buy Apple (and pay their price) just because they weren't like the rest of the industry. That doesn't hold anymore.
356.
by adlpz 14y ago
Come on, if you really think that a drop of coffee will usually kill any electronics you must have never even handled a circuit board... Most laptops (including mi MBP!) will survive light spillage without problems.
357.
by adlpz 14y ago
That's cute, you correcting him. Sorry, that was a terrible pun.
358.
by adlpz 14y ago
Version numbers are not numbers . How would you explain, for example, Chrome's version 24.0.1312.57? Dots separate logical numberings, like version, patch, bugfix, etc. So 3.0 goes after 2.0 And 2.0.2 after 2.0.1. And 1.10 after 1.9 .
359.
by adlpz 14y ago
Heh, good luck doing responsive on IE6 without going crazy!
360.
by adlpz 14y ago
This is hilarious

More ›