adjejmxbdjdn

4 ms·

1.
by adjejmxbdjdn 23d ago
Things have become measurably worse as open standards have been dropped. An example is messaging apps. Today, if I want to remain in touch with my friends and family I have to juggle between Facebook messenger (thank the heavens for this ap
2.
by adjejmxbdjdn 23d ago
Shopify as a company works on a lot more products than Chrome developers do. More relevantly, a lot of their work involves interfacing with hundreds, if not thousands, of external partners, competitors, etc. systems.
3.
by adjejmxbdjdn 29d ago
We don’t live in a pre-9/11 world. There’s no going back to that. If well implemented This seems a reasonable compromise.
4.
by adjejmxbdjdn 29d ago
The commenter you replied to literally provided a list of items that are known to be extremely hazardous. Their questioning whether the outage surrounding a specific hazard is proportionate to its known danger does not mean they believe no
5.
by adjejmxbdjdn 29d ago
> They have developmental effects, immune effects. Thyroid, liver, hormonal systems. Some cause cancer, kidney cancer, obesity. They bind to proteins in your blood, and they change how systems in your bodies work. Is there any evidence t
6.
by adjejmxbdjdn 29d ago
The funny thing is that if you never understand the codebase then you will keep thinking Claude is doing a great work delivering all this incredible software, when all it has done is created unnecessary tech debt.
7.
by adjejmxbdjdn 1mo ago
There’s evidence for the original comment likely being incorrect. NYC turned a major street into a “busway”. So cars can enter, but they have to make the first right, so they don’t use it as a thruway. Pedestrian traffic in that area has ex
8.
by adjejmxbdjdn 1mo ago
Now do dairy operations… One of the heaviest water consumers and a massive user of land (especially when considering the land needed to grow feed). And data centers aren’t creating lagoons of shit. And that’s even before you get to the mora
9.
by adjejmxbdjdn 1mo ago
Yes, but it’s a very specific geopolitical risk. European countries aren’t worried that China will conquer the U.S. and they’d lose access to their gold because a hostile Chinese government controls it. The increased risk is that the U.S. w
10.
by adjejmxbdjdn 1mo ago
I don’t understand how that’s possible. They should have had a better idea of what was happening in the memory markets than pretty much any other entity.
11.
by adjejmxbdjdn 1mo ago
From HN guidelines: > Off topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, or celebrities, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon. So you’re incorrect. HN isn’t off bounds for all political posts, but yes
12.
by adjejmxbdjdn 1mo ago
And the U.S. has been doing even better since 1965. So really the question goes back to you. Either way, your whataboutism isn’t even relevant since those were congressional changes. This is the executive trying to undermine the law.
13.
by adjejmxbdjdn 1mo ago
We need to stop our obsession with exploiting animals. It’s leading us to do insane things damaging our own health and the environment, nevermind how much suffering it’s causing the actual sentient beings we’re using.
14.
by adjejmxbdjdn 1mo ago
Both are clearly ethically wrong. We have alternatives. And many are even more healthful. Theres no reason to personally engage with either.
15.
by adjejmxbdjdn 1mo ago
Imagine seeing American wealth increase dramatically over the past several decades, see tax burdens drastically reduced on the top 0.1%, and see almost all of that drastic increase in wealth go to that 1%, and not be able to come up with a
16.
by adjejmxbdjdn 1mo ago
As an aside, he lost 200 lbs over 2 years, so about 8 lbs a month. Thats on the aggressive side of a healthy weight loss pace, so kudos to him for not just losing the weight but apparently doing it healthily over an extended period of time
17.
by adjejmxbdjdn 2mo ago
I’m pretty sure the commenter you responded to agrees aggressive people are a liability and that’s the problem with current hiring(or at least the hiring contemporaneous to when they heard this). From my own personal conversation with a hos
18.
by adjejmxbdjdn 2mo ago
If you were actually looking for coherence you would consider that both are unethical. The only reason you’re not actually adhering to coherence, as you said, is your fondness for eating cows and pigs. Thats hardly a justification for an un
19.
by adjejmxbdjdn 2mo ago
Your comment is factually wrong. There are at least 3 sources to this article. 1 is the proximate opinion piece that you’ve linked to. There’s also a link to a letter signed by 30 lawmakers and excerpts from that latter. Then there’s a link
20.
by adjejmxbdjdn 2mo ago
The 30 year isn’t as affected by interest rate hikes unless the market is signaling it sees long term inflation despite interest rate hikes. The 30 year should reflect more fundamental issues.
21.
by adjejmxbdjdn 2mo ago
The U.S. was founded by literal terrorists. Almost all freedom fighters who used any amount of violence would definitionally be terrorists. That has absolutely no bearing on countries today and applying the terrorist standard of today to pe
22.
by adjejmxbdjdn 2mo ago
This is just not true. In reality we have little to no idea what the proportion of meat to non meat humans ate at the time. More realistically, different groups of humans ate different ratios of such foods. There were almost certainly a pre
23.
by adjejmxbdjdn 2mo ago
First of all it’s a nice study. The dosages they always give are way too high and mice are rarely a reliable model. But you’re also ignoring the fact that the same study shows that glucose inhibits the behavior. So your claim that the study
24.
by adjejmxbdjdn 2mo ago
Animal farming is a far greater user of resources by far and is a top 3 contributor to breaching every planetary boundary. It also has an easily replaceable alternative that would reduce farmland use by 50% , massively reduce water use, el
25.
by adjejmxbdjdn 2mo ago
Skipping a dinner is not losing you much money. Making a bad trade or missing a good one due to delaying data or bad data can pay for several years worth of bloombergs for everyone in your firm in one moment.
26.
by adjejmxbdjdn 2mo ago
How did the natural gas growth change from before? How did the solar/wind change from before? The data you’ve presented indicates you think only reducing the natural gas number to 0 with no context about trend lines or alternates is an
27.
by adjejmxbdjdn 2mo ago
Ah yes, institutional barriers like the federal government paying companies to cancel their existing renewable projects that are fully funded and investing in fossil fuels instead… Even the Chinese take several years to put up a nuclear pla
28.
by adjejmxbdjdn 2mo ago
It’s funny how they don’t include the most populous bird, the chicken. The cognitive dissonance is probably too strong.
29.
by adjejmxbdjdn 3mo ago
The U.S. also let a bank collapse and shit hit the fan across the world. The global economy isn’t pivoting off Icelandic banks the way it is off US ones.
30.
by adjejmxbdjdn 3mo ago
You may take this as “USA bad”, comment, but let’s take the U.S. life expectancy reaches record high (in 2024) link you posted. That sounds like a good thing and it is. But it’s not a US story. In fact, other wealthy countries didn’t just a

More ›