Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
_o_
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
26 ms
·
181.
▲
by
_o_
9y ago
Well, they would probably think I am happy as I was laughing in tears and some mumbling was heard in a form of "people.. are... really using this... they are really using it..." ;)
182.
▲
by
_o_
9y ago
It is not about men "trying" to do it. They (at least most) don't want it. Who wants to work more if they have enough for their needs? But their needs are also having a partner and the partner wants a man who is "alpha&q
183.
▲
by
_o_
9y ago
And it is ok, that you skip it, the difference on pay gap is men having far worse life for those few extra bucks. It is not everything about the money and your path is correct. We (men) are doing it wrong and we are the idiots. The extra mo
184.
▲
by
_o_
9y ago
My opinion is right to the spot. The amount of posting for rust is inapropriate to the amount of posts every other language has while it seriously doesn't offer something revolutionary to developers. All fans are having c++ to be able
185.
▲
by
_o_
9y ago
The only problem is that for some, rust is a silver bullet that is going to bridge lack of system dev. by learning another language. Sorry it does not work this way. C is just fine, we don't need rust, it can probably be implemented as
186.
▲
by
_o_
9y ago
Just go and compile hello world with this: https://bellard.org/tcc/ And then with rust. Open your favorite decompiler and decompile both. C has again and again shown that less is more and it is going to stay that way.
187.
▲
by
_o_
9y ago
I know it is about rust but I just don't see the point. If you want for whatever reason small binaries, rust is just wrong, take c (or asm). The closest you go to processor instructions, the smaller the binary is and rust is compleatly
188.
▲
by
_o_
9y ago
1. April joke :) The point of c/c++ in comparision to other languages is that you can do anything and having a huge toolbox for that. Pointers are excelent sledgehammer. You can be perfectly fine with not using them but c++ need to h
189.
▲
by
_o_
9y ago
Heh, this webrtc story is at least few years old and everyone privacy / security aware is blocking it. For testing webrtc and other leaks including fingerprinting rather use https://browserleaks.com/ (and it is unable
190.
▲
by
_o_
9y ago
Most of spying comes on behalf od google framework, that comes with google play. LineageOS wont solve that (actually they refused changes that would allow replacing google framework with microg) but a fork of it will. They are reimplementin
191.
▲
by
_o_
9y ago
Based on my tracking of what google services does on your phone, what google shows to you is far from all what google knows about you, they have set those pages as a PR, to calm down users and only throwed in some peanuts. After GDPR kicks
192.
▲
by
_o_
9y ago
"Moreover, the document focuses on the concept of privacy by design and tries to make it more clear, especially for mobile app developers. Approaches to privacy and data protection by design and by default are presented that help trans
193.
▲
GDPR: Privacy and data protection in mobile applications
(enisa.europa.eu)
1 points
by
_o_
9y ago
|
1 comments
194.
▲
by
_o_
9y ago
If you have taken GDPR into account from the start, the costs are trivial, it only means you will organize data differently so this "startup worrying" thing is a nonsense. Those worries are trying to do PR from companies/deve
195.
▲
by
_o_
9y ago
Check it a little bit better, grep for "market". Google? Facebook (i dont have FB account, never had!)? I can hardly wait to NOT tick those and demand view of shared data. They are already profiting from the service they provide b
196.
▲
by
_o_
9y ago
Once you have a way to backup data per user, just encrypt them with random key and once the account is deleted, delete the random key. We have done it this way, with having multiple live copies of backup key table on multiple locations and
197.
▲
by
_o_
9y ago
No it will not. For consent it is explicitly forbiden to use legal / technical speech and you can't cascade it. Allowing you to use my data has nothing to do with you giving my data to google. The more 3rd party "providers&qu
198.
▲
by
_o_
9y ago
Ask your chat provider if he is GDPR compliant, he will provide you the confirmations that you need to add to your page. Regarding google analytics, you are risking getting banned if you feed it with personal data (including ip). https:&#x
199.
▲
by
_o_
9y ago
Here is your hero: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leopold_II_of_Belgium
200.
▲
by
_o_
9y ago
Not really true :) $20mil or 4% global revenue whichever is higher. $20mil is nothing for ggl/fb/... This time EU did it right, I doubt some small local shop will ever get max punishment but the % of global revenue is on the other
201.
▲
by
_o_
9y ago
We will see, new regulation is coming after GDPR and I bet they will plug the missing holes there. There was a cookie law that everyone circumvented. Now the same people are complaining about GDPR. The next round is going to put even more r
202.
▲
by
_o_
9y ago
I really don't think (and I am developer, I will need to comply) that anything in GDPR is hard to understand. Treat data from others in same way as you would treat (and you are treating) yours. You are not selling your personal details
203.
▲
by
_o_
9y ago
No one is forcing you to follow it, but I suspect this is just the begining, GDPR is comming from EU due to history reasons, Europe has a lot of bad memories about keeping lists and tracking users. From Nazis to Stasi, USSR and so on and on
204.
▲
by
_o_
9y ago
I am more into USA state of thinking, money justifies everything. So I have mentioned it as a bussiness model. ;)
205.
▲
by
_o_
9y ago
One more interesting thought. If you are using ad provider/tracker/data reseler X/... located in USA which is GDPR compliant and is doing bussiness with EU, and you are feeding them with toxic information you didn't get
206.
▲
by
_o_
9y ago
To me it seems quite simple, if the information can be used to identify user it is personal information and you need explanation why you need it and opt in. If this is a problem for you, maybe avoid collecting what you don't need. The
207.
▲
by
_o_
9y ago
It is very costly for existing (!) companies, for startups it comes with fraction of cost, if taken into account from first line of code, from first create table. In few years it will be normal.
208.
▲
by
_o_
9y ago
But that is good, right?
209.
▲
by
_o_
9y ago
Very simplified, you can not use or give personal data to someone else without optin given consent (where you must state in non legal, non tech speech for what they will be used) and same goes for enabling others (ad networks, google,..) to
210.
▲
by
_o_
9y ago
I will show you another case, company that isnt "bitching" over laws that are good for all humans not just EU and does the right thing, you know backblaze, right? "The changes that are being made by companies such as Backblaz
More ›