Trundle

34 ms·

301.
by Trundle 10y ago
If like any other professional body, a group with an interest in keeping barrier to entry high and expensive. Writing commercial software without a four year degree? Well that's just downright irresponsible and immoral! No residency wo
302.
by Trundle 10y ago
>Viable for what, exactly? Sales. That's what makes a viable product. One that will sell. Despite elsewhere in this comment chain you saying "I'm talking about product viability not technical" I can't help but th
303.
by Trundle 10y ago
Seeing as there are already people trying to use their Tesla autopilot as autonomous capabilities, I'm pretty sure they'll be viable as soon as they are road legal.
304.
by Trundle 10y ago
>Just because you have the /power/ to block their ads has nothing to do with the morality. Sure, but one should probably have to start with making the argument for there being a moral burden incurred when sending a digital mess
305.
by Trundle 10y ago
Sorry, how does it lend credence to the genetic theory? Ones genes don't change do they? But the need for escapism can.
306.
by Trundle 10y ago
Maybe I'm confused but France couldn't make America do anything. The question is, can France tell a company "you can't operate here if you're going to do X in Y country" which it already can generally, just may
307.
by Trundle 10y ago
Given that the trade seems pretty apparent, at least to me. "You can use our thing here for free but in exchange we might want to use one of your things later also for free", I have to ask why you don't think not agreeing to
308.
by Trundle 10y ago
If you're just after any % so you can have a semblance of illusion of control, you could always spend some time researching safest seating positions in planes, how to position ones self to change direction in a free fall, and ideal lan
309.
by Trundle 10y ago
At no point in his comment did he say kids should go to college.
310.
by Trundle 10y ago
Absolutely, that's what I meant by "scales with historical earnings and wealth."
311.
by Trundle 10y ago
Mostly I'm implying that your argument doesn't hold weight. You don't throw someone in prison because if you don't there's a double standard with some other offence. You throw them in there because the crime they co
312.
by Trundle 10y ago
Not familiar with "two wrongs don't make a right"?
313.
by Trundle 10y ago
Nothing about her being able to pick a new business plan as she pleases implies that she'll retain all (or any) current Theranos staff, equipment, or offices.
314.
by Trundle 10y ago
Because you're being pitched on the biotech firm being able to land fat military contracts.
315.
by Trundle 10y ago
Plenty of companies have success. There are tons of digital marketers killing it on there. The level of targeting you can achieve is absurd. It's zero sum game where you compete against other advertisers though. Because of this it seem
316.
by Trundle 10y ago
Uh, wtf? Capitalism requires capital , which is exactly what you are railing against. A monopoly over using a thing.
317.
by Trundle 10y ago
Is the benefit of big four not high salary and great benefits? Google consistently ranks as the top company to work for.
318.
by Trundle 10y ago
Some of the voting public.
319.
by Trundle 10y ago
Well sure, these people could technically play the game without affecting others. What's the point though? As a single player game Go is lacking and as a social game it's the hottest thing around. I'd be surprised to learn th
320.
by Trundle 10y ago
I don't see a problem with that. Different strokes for different folks. What I'm enjoying is available to you, but you've chosen to limit yourself to a constricted set of abilities, because you (apparently) enjoy the limitat
321.
by Trundle 10y ago
If someone was to sit down and use paper + pencil + time to accomplish the same thing, would you still have issue with it? It's publicly available data. Should you also not watch your competitors television ads or walk in to their phys
322.
by Trundle 10y ago
and how rarely we talked about or did anything that was really meaningful for me Just to check, have you found this to be important to you through experience or are you just sort of assuming that meaning is important? Those groups and cou
323.
by Trundle 10y ago
There's no chance these things aren't riddled with shell accounts bumping the price up and also winning.
324.
by Trundle 10y ago
Generally you rent a permit/work for a company that owns them as a taxi driver. If there are taxi drivers buying medallions then they're 1) a small minority and 2)effectively business owners that are making a capital investment. P
325.
by Trundle 10y ago
>They're not our slaves to be forced into productive jobs Slaves no but being forced in to productive jobs is the whole point of tying income to market demands. A force which effects us all not just taxi drivers. >The deserve som
326.
by Trundle 10y ago
>Why don't these dummies just forego income for months or years to get training for new careers that they may or may not even be able to enter? Applies to everyone that enters a skilled trade/profession, not specifically driver
327.
by Trundle 10y ago
Taxi drivers risk losing the difference between what they can earn working as a taxi driver and what they can earn on ride sharing apps. It's probably a fair drop but hardly all of their income.
328.
by Trundle 10y ago
Again, I feel you haven't read the spirit of this comment accurately. The comment specifically talked about those people not wanting to do another form of work. It wasn't a generic "lets talk about mass automation induced
329.
by Trundle 10y ago
I'll bite although this isn't the most researched of my opinions that's for sure. Humans happiness isn't concerned with absolute standard of living but more comparative standard of living. I don't mean just consciou
330.
by Trundle 10y ago
Many of them don't want to go back to school or get technical training... What do we tell the taxi and truck drivers when Uber shows up with self-drivers, etc.? Uhhh, how about "suck it up and do it anyway"? I know plenty o

More ›