Trundle

39 ms·

331.
by Trundle 10y ago
The lack of self control was why I don't buy the family size. I was making the same point you are.
332.
by Trundle 10y ago
I'm in control of what I put in my mouth too. Still don't buy the family size chocolate.
333.
by Trundle 10y ago
Business is very much a timing/market thing. The money faucet could turn off any day. If you come across easy money you generally want to see if you can turn it in to not so easy but still efficient use of time money in exchange for ge
334.
by Trundle 10y ago
What did you mean "works great" for then? Just that your cron job works?
335.
by Trundle 10y ago
Listening to the little nagging voice of career sensibility stops being a good idea if you're not going to then turn that quality salary and employment security in to a base for a fun life. If not programming, that 20% of your brain wo
336.
by Trundle 10y ago
I'd think Amazon would be able buy either for less than market value. They'd drop in value anyway if Amazon moved away from them and did their own thing.
337.
by Trundle 10y ago
Is preventing wealth transfer from parent to child not their goal? In that case one would expect that transferring house from parent to child not being allowed isn't an unwanted side effect but part of the intended one.
338.
by Trundle 10y ago
I don't see how you can say that it would clearly be more effective when digital advertising is data driven.
339.
by Trundle 10y ago
That's the case irrespective of them selling information.
340.
by Trundle 10y ago
Aren't you hypothesizing aliens + making human whims seem like universal goals? I don't think there needs to be an easier source of energy than solar to justify not tapping stars, just lack of desire.
341.
by Trundle 10y ago
In the enterprise market?
342.
by Trundle 10y ago
Maybe one day they'll work out this whole global business thing. Btw did you read about Margaret Thatcher resigning? Pretty crazy huh.
343.
by Trundle 10y ago
Sure, just ignore everything else you typed. That seems reasonable. "Explanation of a problem" even here you're showing of what I've accused you of. You have a problem. HN doesn't seem to have a problem. WSJ doesn
344.
by Trundle 10y ago
Your posts were definitely stronger than it might be nice if WSJ gave HN users the same treatment they give to Google users. People that make radical generalizations about others based upon one data point are among the most dangerous in
345.
by Trundle 10y ago
I think you're either just Tesla's target market or align with it in media consumption. They certainly have a PR division putting in work but without HN practically no Tesla information would hit my eyes.
346.
by Trundle 10y ago
As far as I can tell, some people believe everyone elses primary purpose should be to make their life better. The owners, writers, marketers, developers, and other stakeholders in the wsj shouldn't be thinking about providing for thems
347.
by Trundle 10y ago
It seems very common to me for people to act like there's no middle ground between not having a Facebook account and scrolling up and down the feed for hours a day. Personally, I use it for chat and events and that's basically it.
348.
by Trundle 10y ago
Definitely stay away from the comments on any article specifically about ads/ad blocking/content site monetisation haha. This guy isn't alone.
349.
by Trundle 10y ago
Could even be better. I didn't say anything about the value of the laptop, just whether or not I consider it a macbook air clone.
350.
by Trundle 10y ago
An Air clone to me would have a metal body as that's a pretty defining characteristic.
351.
by Trundle 10y ago
Why wages? It seems backward to tie income to effort more so than the market wants to reward. How taxing it and distributing it as just transfer payments is making excuses for anti-social behaviour I have no idea. Do you want to see masses
352.
by Trundle 10y ago
You're "competing" against and playing with those within your geography though.It's an issue for those that want to be posting impressive screenshots on reddit/forums that live in the suburbs sure but outside of tha
353.
by Trundle 10y ago
If entertainment is superfluous then you have an enviable vision of man kinds purpose. As far as I can tell amusing ourselves until we die is our whole deal. Entertainment isn't superfluous, entertainment is the truest and most importa
354.
by Trundle 10y ago
That's exactly how he plans to help the working class no? I don't want to get in to whether it will help, just pointing out that you're basically saying "my biggest problem with Trump is the part of his platform you fi
355.
by Trundle 10y ago
While true, it would mean the comparison is largely meaningless if one car company did their own aluminium mining/smelting and the other didn't.
356.
by Trundle 10y ago
>This is a straw man - nobody expects perfection. For some reason there is a lot of resistance to educating the use and asking their permission. The person I responded to specifically said waste . As in the part they find morally unacce
357.
by Trundle 10y ago
Would you care to share the premises that lead to such a stance? I can't think of how such an obligation would be occurred or why. To me use indicates that the value the end user gets is greater than the costs. Why would creating somet
358.
by Trundle 10y ago
Anyone reading this comment thread curious about trying shouldn't just go with feather because crdb likes them or gillete 7 o clocks because sithadmin likes them. Different blades can make a huge difference and different people have di
359.
by Trundle 10y ago
What's more is there can't really be an established "market" for a unique exploit. If a product isn't being regularly traded then there's no easily findable pool of buyers. There's also no ongoing/rep
360.
by Trundle 10y ago
Chromium?

More ›