Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Timon3
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
16 ms
·
391.
▲
by
Timon3
11mo ago
I do understand how recommendation systems work, thank you. You've written twice in this thread that you'd need to ban any kind of content recommendation system. Is that what you're advocating for? Your comments read to me as
392.
▲
by
Timon3
11mo ago
No? Our society doesn't treat jobs as equally important as all kinds of content. Having rules around content recommendation around jobs is easily doable without banning any kind of content recommendation. Or did I miss obvious sarcasm?
393.
▲
by
Timon3
11mo ago
Given that the bug is a well-known and inherent flaw of the technology used, I don't understand what good this would do. It's not enough to say "whoops, we didn't think the machine would do the thing the machine is known
394.
▲
by
Timon3
11mo ago
> Redit and Twitter didn't restrict their API use because of LLMs. Meta haven't locked down Instagram because of LLMs. they do it because they need people locked into their ecosystem. Yet the recent wave of API & public sit
395.
▲
by
Timon3
11mo ago
You're getting downvoted for stating falsehoods. > Why you’re describing isn’t a recent phenomenon. Not even remotely. The big platforms were accessible without login a few years ago, now they're not. That is literally a rece
396.
▲
by
Timon3
11mo ago
Not everyone, but far too many.
397.
▲
by
Timon3
1y ago
Longer shifts mean fewer shift turnovers for any patients that stay a sufficient amount of time, especially if longer than 24h. The world doesn't run on boolean logic. A solution can improve an issue without solving it completely.
398.
▲
by
Timon3
1y ago
Can you explain how that applies in this specific case? Because I can't come up with a scenario where you suggesting corrections to Grokipedia does any good. If you're correcting a lie that they actively want to spread (e.g. the
399.
▲
by
Timon3
1y ago
Hah, I came here to share Pathologic & hbomberguys video too! Such a fascinating subject of discussion, and an incredibly unique story. By the way, Pathologic 3 will release beginning of 2026!
400.
▲
by
Timon3
1y ago
Could you share your calculations showing that it's better for society to let the old, poor and downtrodden die in the streets?
401.
▲
by
Timon3
1y ago
And just to be explicit, because I see people lie about this very often: this decision was made by the conservative party (CDU) while the Greens were not part of the government.
402.
▲
by
Timon3
1y ago
> You can fix bright and loud. Not in socially acceptable ways - people look at you strangely when you have sunglasses on indoors, and when I'm wearing headphones people usually gesture for me to take them off when they want to talk
403.
▲
by
Timon3
1y ago
How can there be decades of cancel culture, when you're referring to the term used since 2018?
404.
▲
by
Timon3
1y ago
> And, regarding bcachefs still being marked as experimental: I'm being much more conservative with the experimental label than btrfs or ext4 were. Your data is safer on bcachefs than btrfs, today: you're not going to lose a fi
405.
▲
by
Timon3
1y ago
> If the filesystem corrupts data, it has to be fixed at the maintainer's discretion. This is what the users want. Tough luck it makes Linus' life harder! Where do you get this idea? Lots of Linux users want lots of things - a
406.
▲
by
Timon3
1y ago
While the graphics aren't as good as some other modern titles, the world and art design make up for it ten times over. There are a bunch of locations that could be paintings, especially: - The first steps in Limveld - Liurnia of the La
407.
▲
by
Timon3
1y ago
Just looking at the number of papers gives a very wrong impression. You can have hundreds of papers that change very little, and a single one that changes a whole field. JWST has already generated lots of counter-evidence for theories we we
408.
▲
by
Timon3
1y ago
Similarly, a more recent proposal for a new QUERY verb: https://httpwg.org/http-extensions/draft-ietf-httpbis-safe-m...
409.
▲
by
Timon3
1y ago
> I don't believe you. You went for the old "they are all brainwashed" routine, specifically after I complained about people doing that. Which tells me you have bought into partisan politics. I'm doing that "rout
410.
▲
by
Timon3
1y ago
Again: I do genuinely hope that you're correct. But the pattern I've seen is that it doesn't matter whether his supporters have consistently been against something, because they'll change their opinion once Trump actuall
411.
▲
by
Timon3
1y ago
Let's wait and see if they're still unhappy about the bombing in one week. This is a pattern I've seen time and time again with his base, e.g. with January 6th - they start off unhappy & surprised until their media has st
412.
▲
by
Timon3
1y ago
Good point, if we're already being pedantic we should be accurate. I've updated the version strings in my comment, thanks!
413.
▲
by
Timon3
1y ago
That kind of goes counter to semantic versioning, where: - x.y.Z (patch) -> backward compatible bug fixes - x.Y.z (minor) -> backward compatible new features - X.y.z (major) -> breaking changes But of course it's fine to use w
414.
▲
by
Timon3
1y ago
It seems you didn't quite understand my point. You can remove the subsidies of nuclear and solar, in which case solar is still profitable. If you remove the subsidies of mass transit and individual transit, neither is profitable anymor
415.
▲
by
Timon3
1y ago
All forms of transit require subsidies, but the same doesn't go for all forms of power generation. That makes it a bad comparison.
416.
▲
by
Timon3
1y ago
If we apply the same argument for mass transit, we also have to be fair and apply it for individual transit. Or are you under the impression that's not subsidized? It usually receives far higher subsidies than mass transit!
417.
▲
by
Timon3
1y ago
That's a very useful tip, thank you!
418.
▲
by
Timon3
1y ago
> They're never going to manage to do that, just on a technical level Why not? Given enough data, it's possible to train models to differentiate - especially since humans can pick up on the difference pretty well. > Plus som
419.
▲
by
Timon3
1y ago
It's a review of multiple studies. They literally say that the radiation can't really be the cause, yet there is the measurable increase in childhood leukemia. Do you just want to deny reality when it doesn't suit your prec
420.
▲
by
Timon3
1y ago
It isn't immediately obvious to me that the French School of Economic Warfare is a trusted source on these topics, especially since you just linked to a parliamentary question - I'll have to read up on that. I just wanted to make
More ›