8 ms·

That kind of goes counter to semantic versioning, where: - x.y.Z (patch) -> backward compatible bug fixes - x.Y.z (minor) -> backward compatible new features

by Timon3 1y ago

That kind of goes counter to semantic versioning, where: - x.y.Z (patch) -> backward compatible bug fixes - x.Y.z (minor) -> backward compatible new features - X.y.z (major) -> breaking changes But of course it's fine to use whatever versioning scheme you like, as long as you communicate it to your consumers. https://semver.org/ https://semver.org/ Edit: updated the version strings for clarity.

zamadatix 1y ago
Minor note, but since the topic is accurate semvar: rule 4 specifies 0.x.y is a special case where anything may change at any time.
- _9y71 1y ago
  Relevant section: https://semver.org/#:~:text=How%20should%20I,next%20major%20version. https://semver.org/#:~:text=How%20should%20I,next%20major%20...
- Timon3 1y ago
  Good point, if we're already being pedantic we should be accurate. I've updated the version strings in my comment, thanks!