Just looking at the number of papers gives a very wrong impression. You can have hundreds of papers that change very little, and a single one that changes a who

Just looking at the number of papers gives a very wrong impression. You can have hundreds of papers that change very little, and a single one that changes a whole field. JWST has already generated lots of counter-evidence for theories we were sure about based on Hubble. If your comparison doesn't even pay attention to this simple fact, how is it worth anything?