Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Ste_Tokyo
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
1.
▲
by
Ste_Tokyo
2y ago
The Gazans voted for Hamas as their leaders knowing their genocidal policy towards Jews. The October 7 attack was popular among Palestinians including Gazans at first. Less so now. It is fair then to say that the Gazans bear some responsibi
2.
▲
by
Ste_Tokyo
2y ago
Almost all Israeli land was granted by the UN or won in wars started by the Arabs, not stolen. You can criticize Israel for building settlements on the West Bank in contravention of international law. And because Israel is a democratic stat
3.
▲
by
Ste_Tokyo
2y ago
The state was not as a fact imposed on the Palestinians. After centuries living under empires, they were offered a state for the first time ever by the UN in 1947 but turned it down. Instead they decided to go to war to destroy Israel and h
4.
▲
by
Ste_Tokyo
2y ago
The Palestinians are in the situation they are in because of their own choices, not because of some Greater Israel plan which the poster seems to think is the reason. The German people and the Japanese people suffered similar privations in
5.
▲
by
Ste_Tokyo
2y ago
Apparently, it is true that the Likud manifesto of 1977 called for only Israeli sovereignty “from the river to the sea”, but this is already de facto the case as Israel are occupying the West Bank. And they don’t appear to have killed all t
6.
▲
by
Ste_Tokyo
2y ago
Has that happened?
7.
▲
by
Ste_Tokyo
2y ago
The stated objective of the Final Solution was to murder literally every Jew in Europe, thus the “Final”. The stated objective of Hamas, voted into power by the Arabs of Gaza, is to murder literally every Jew in Israel. I don’t think that
8.
▲
by
Ste_Tokyo
2y ago
And what Native American tribes sometimes did to each other was genocide. There were lots of actors in the fight for the American land mass - the US , the British Empire, the French Empire, Mexico, the Japanese were even having a look. So I
9.
▲
by
Ste_Tokyo
3y ago
Of course it contains GR as a low-energy limit. Where it can be physically checked, it is equivalent to the existing successful theory; where it makes new predictions, it can't be checked and so is almost certainly wrong. To make progr
10.
▲
by
Ste_Tokyo
3y ago
Does the "Wolfram Model" allow easier analysis of certain physical situations like the Hamiltonian does? Thought not. So what's your point?
11.
▲
by
Ste_Tokyo
3y ago
Clearly the goal of a first course in linear algebra is not mathematical maturity. If you don't set up the notation consistently from the start, once you start introducing change of bases formulae or proving row rank = column rank, e
12.
▲
by
Ste_Tokyo
3y ago
The book starts out writing vectors as row vectors (1 x n matrices), then later introduces the matrix of a vector as a column vector. Just represent vectors as column vectors from the start, define R^n as R^n,1 (in the notation of the book)