Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Sol-
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
151.
▲
by
Sol-
3y ago
If that's the case, whitelisting the most popular apps might be somewhat of a solution, no? Also I think being transparent about the fears that LLMs take from your site without returning any value would probably be met with understandi
152.
▲
by
Sol-
3y ago
Whether you think it's an extinction risk or just a problem in the wrong hands, both concerns ultimately seem to require strong regulation. Very unpopular around here ("you can't ban matrix multiplication"!) but hard to
153.
▲
by
Sol-
3y ago
But people already try to do that, see AutoGPT and similar endeavors. Whether agentic AI will appear is not a question at all - humans will make it so just to see what happens or to serve their goals.
154.
▲
by
Sol-
3y ago
Only a three second sample for in context learning needed to scam people now, very impressive.
155.
▲
by
Sol-
3y ago
Couldn't the same be said for your interpretation of this issue? I don't care much about the RIAA, but I don't particularly want AI impersonation to become commonplace and legitimized. That doesn't mean I "side"
156.
▲
by
Sol-
3y ago
Intuitively it feels logical that this would be challenged, but what do I know about copyright law. Surely cloning a famous artist's voice and musical style to piggyback off of their popularity would be some kind of infringement? And i
157.
▲
by
Sol-
4y ago
I think the ReAct paper also popularized this approach: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.03629
158.
▲
by
Sol-
4y ago
> Students aren’t writing because they’re “motivated”, they are writing because they have to. It’s a grade. So what? That argument doesn't really make sense to me. An educated populace is generally considered to be a good thing and
159.
▲
by
Sol-
4y ago
I mean, we already know that if the tech bros have to balance safety vs. disruption, they'll always choose the latter, no matter the cost. They'll sprinkle some concerned language about impacts in their technical reports to preten
160.
▲
by
Sol-
4y ago
Why is the sentiment here so much that LLMs will somehow be decentralized and run locally at some point? Has the story of the internet so far not been that centralization has pretty much always won?
161.
▲
by
Sol-
4y ago
So it seems reasonable to be pessimistic about a potential beneficial outcome, given these conditions. The quest for meaning is perhaps the lifeline for Meta's VR ambitions. If there's nothing left to do in the real world, people
162.
▲
by
Sol-
4y ago
> This has been happening since the inception of school. Calculators made math easier. Sparknotes made book reports easier. Wikipedia made essays easier. And advance of LLM will make general thinking and cognition easier, relegating huma
163.
▲
by
Sol-
4y ago
Hook up our kid to the AI, so they are prepared for the world when their partner will also be an AI. Good idea, they'll be prepared for a world where nothing is real anymore. (I do realize this echos concerns from earlier generations a
164.
▲
by
Sol-
4y ago
Loved reading your thoughts on the situation in this thread, super interesting and depressing at the same time. I wonder how long it will take politics to appreciate the deep societal problems that may soon arise. Probably it will be too li
165.
▲
by
Sol-
4y ago
What's luddite about not wanting to read ghostwritten AI stories posted by fake writers? If I want AI stories or art, I can just prompt the models myself and don't need a useless intermediary. On the bright side, this is likely al
166.
▲
by
Sol-
4y ago
But then the AI is the writer and you're just an editor or curator. So perhaps don't call yourself a writer if the AI produced a significant amount of the content. Same goes for Stable Diffusion/Midjourney prompters who shoul
167.
▲
by
Sol-
4y ago
Not even OpenAI seems to know. They put some perfunctory disclaimer on economics into their risks section of the GPT4 report, but their lack of understanding the consequences didn't seem to prevent them from pushing this development, s
168.
▲
by
Sol-
4y ago
Figured that they'd hop on the techno-utopian bandwagon that's currently being pushed and double down on bringing the glassholes back instead. People are also seem more desensitized to privacy concerns nowadays, so they might have
169.
▲
by
Sol-
4y ago
Thanks for your reply, cool that there are others who have the same interpretation of the ongoing development. I said "it probably won't happen", I mostly meant that in a resigned way, where I think that humanity won't m
170.
▲
by
Sol-
4y ago
Language learning in general seems like something that should be on the way out. All technical building blocks for simultaneous translation exist and modern speech synthesis systems can even emulate the sound of your voice in the foreign la
171.
▲
by
Sol-
4y ago
I admire your optimism if you think that a human in the loop will add any value. Other than for humoring/entertaining the human, of course, which is what I meant with learning-as-a-hobby. Also, I'm not educator or very knowledgeab
172.
▲
by
Sol-
4y ago
Oh yeah, the basic income thing I just threw in there because I think even in the best case where the disempowered and soon-to-be unemployed workers will be cared for, humanity will be reduced to AI-governed content consumers without much a
173.
▲
by
Sol-
4y ago
I can relate. Maybe the Amish got a point after all!
174.
▲
by
Sol-
4y ago
Given that learning will probably soon not be required anymore to live a successful life (AIs will do everything better than you), I guess such learning-as-a-hobby apps will be the remaining niche to entertain the humans on basic income. I
175.
▲
by
Sol-
4y ago
With the current progress, human learning seems to be obsolete soon, so there's little point in optimizing an AI for teaching. Unless you mean only as a hobby to pass the time. > AIs may be tutoring and raising other baby AIs, prepa
176.
▲
by
Sol-
4y ago
Interesting how quickly we are pushing ahead with obsoleting human cognition. It may bring many benefits, but I wonder if at some point this development should not be decided by society at large instead of a single well-funded entity that i
177.
▲
by
Sol-
4y ago
> and their commitment to actually guiding AI for the better I think the Silicon Valley elite's definition of "for the better" means "for the better for people like us". The popularity of the longtermism and tran
178.
▲
by
Sol-
4y ago
How they value unborn future lives also veers into absurdity when you realize that the logical goal from a utilitarian perspective then is to populate the universe with trillions upon trillions of humans, just as long as each human at least
179.
▲
by
Sol-
4y ago
Maybe an unexpected existential risk for humanity is further collapsing birth rates because people will happy enough with their AI relationships? A more boring extinction scenario than being turned into paperclips, but perhaps possible.
180.
▲
by
Sol-
4y ago
> We've survived nukes for almost 80 years, we proved we can survive such things We survived nukes because they were heavily controlled and their spread contained, no? How is that an argument that containment and regulation wouldn&#
More ›