Smudge

18 ms·

121.
by Smudge 12y ago
That query means nothing. Most of those results include the non-prefixed version as well. The prefixed one is there for backwards compatibility.
122.
by Smudge 12y ago
I'm a fan of using the right tool for the job. If you can't use git effectively or it just doesn't fit into your workflow, then, hey, don't use it. But, having used both, I'd actually like to know... Why are these t
123.
by Smudge 12y ago
You're right -- they can't limit this service to ONLY Facebook or Twitter and expect it to succeed. They'd need to give you a big enough slice of the internet that most external links will work. Or, at the very least, they wo
124.
by Smudge 12y ago
My worry isn't that service providers are finding ways to package and sell limited internet access, and that this violates net neutrality. Ideally I wish there were something preventing this, but if you're paying only for Facebook
125.
by Smudge 12y ago
I'm not entirely convinced that the majority of internet users would really miss the rest of the internet if all but the 500 (or 1,000) top websites disappeared. I could see a world where if we left it up to the consumers, the majority
126.
by Smudge 12y ago
No this is not unique. Tons of services exploit this loophole (free conference calls, adult chat lines, phone-to-ip services, to name a few). It is enabled by "common carrier" laws, meaning a phone carrier is legally obligated to
127.
by Smudge 12y ago
The triads are at a higher level. Once you get down to individual contributors there is typically a high ratio of Dev and QA to PM (maybe 1-2 PMs per team of 15), and usually a couple more Devs than QA. I'm not sure how widely those ra
128.
by Smudge 12y ago
> if your goal is to only work 16-hour weeks, it's in your interest to attempt to demonstrate you can provide at least as much value as an average 40-hour-per-week-developer. I'm not convinced that's true. Most developers,
129.
by Smudge 12y ago
The practical interest for you , as the employer, is the quality of your team and of the work produced -- something you should be optimizing for regardless. Say you find a dev who nails all of your interviews, is passionate about the kind
130.
by Smudge 12y ago
> We have an in-house tool we use called Fare which reads this configuration and sets up the appropriate SQS and SNS queues. Would love to see this released publicly. As stated in the post, there aren't a ton of (public) examples of
131.
by Smudge 12y ago
You have to balance that with the fact that the doctor has the right to stay employed. If contents of the doctor's brain (including the medical history of his patients) are so critical that the practice would lose customers if the doct
132.
by Smudge 12y ago
And if Google has any ethics (which it does, and presumably he does too) he won't transition any of those customers. The list of customers would be considered proprietary information. But his experience in dealing with customers, in
133.
by Smudge 12y ago
> That's a boatload of navel gazing. I had to chuckle, but that's a good way of putting it. Does the design community really need more introspection? My answer would be a resounding 'No', but maybe Zurb feels differen
134.
by Smudge 12y ago
I have yet to actually see Tavern, but I doubt I'll find it all that useful. What made Forrst so awesome (early on at least) was how easy it was to get feedback on your personal work. The site's guidelines and standards required a
135.
by Smudge 12y ago
> If you look closely, rendering presentation layer on the server side and then sending it to the client is a hack and we've been doing it for a long time. It's time for changes. From the view/presentation layer's per
136.
by Smudge 12y ago
I find that the two languages are actually not as dissimilar as you may be led to believe. You can write your Ruby a bit more like Java (use more plain old class objects for most of your business logic, and wrap usage of the heftier DSLs&
137.
by Smudge 12y ago
> import and share with your team for feedback Ah, got it. At first I thought this was a service which actually provides the (people) editors who read over your material, which would be great for me, since I don't actually have a &#
138.
by Smudge 12y ago
They go on to define their terms: "breaking down traditional data center technologies into their core components" -- very little to do with what we think of as "data aggregation." So, I wouldn't exactly call it iron
139.
by Smudge 12y ago
I'd be interested to hear how you plan to solve that problem exactly. There are several[1] existing[2] solutions[3] attempting to solve the problem of versioning binary files in git, but even then, the history of your code and the hist
140.
by Smudge 12y ago
Got this JS alert: "This website abuses rawgit.com. You should complain to its owner."
141.
by Smudge 12y ago
This just means more people will rely on covertly scraping their data. It also means, much like Twitter and the way they nerfed their developer ecosystem, Netflix will gain much more control over any available 3rd party offerings (as they&#
142.
by Smudge 12y ago
Why not, exactly? (serious question)
143.
by Smudge 12y ago
Nice response time!
144.
by Smudge 12y ago
I don't disagree with you, but just FYI, 'ad hominem' has a pretty specific meaning and I don't think it applies in this case. Simply calling someone 'panic-prone' isn't in itself ad hominem. If the argume
145.
by Smudge 12y ago
Except the number of startup ideas is not fixed, just the number of months, so you haven't exactly found the "best idea" -- more that you've found the best month+idea pairing. It might still be an okay approximation if y
146.
by Smudge 12y ago
The demo is slow as molasses on my 2012-era Macbook Air (Google Chrome). Seems to have something to do with the scroll hijacking, which IMO is usually a bad idea. I wonder if there is a way to do this kind of vertical presentation while sti
147.
by Smudge 12y ago
> it seems like there is a lack of strong technical leadership and a lot of big decisions are being made without thinking them through I didn't get that impression at all. The ability to do it right (tm) the first time is quite ofte
148.
by Smudge 12y ago
In such cases -- where it is JavaScript's responsibility to mutate the CSS at runtime -- it seems like the 'will-change' property should also be added/activated using JS. However, most of the CSS transforms I write are p
149.
by Smudge 12y ago
You're right -- my mistake. I mistook your comment for someone else's.
150.
by Smudge 12y ago
I didn't realize we were talking about node here, so I suppose you're right. I'm a noob at node. Which of course is ages old. Way older than any of those other technologies I've been using for the past 15 years or so

More ›