SkyBelow

26 ms·

301.
by SkyBelow 2y ago
It ends up being a reflection in the flaws built into humans. We have many vices. Individuals overcome it, but as a group we are susceptible. We have a long history of deciding where to draw the line between exploiting a vice to control
302.
by SkyBelow 2y ago
>Is this really a sensible factor to consider? Sensible or cognitive bias that is in play regardless if it is sensible? I've seen a little research on jobs that discriminate against people not currently employed, with longer period
303.
by SkyBelow 2y ago
>has to like me I feel likely people aren't imagining with enough cyberpunk dystopian enthusiasm. Can't an AI be made that doesn't inherently like people? Wouldn't it be possible to make an AI that likes some people
304.
by SkyBelow 2y ago
>Surprising, but you can't just dismiss statistics on the basis that they're surprising to you. Why not? While there are many falacies that people are surprised by that are mathematically true, when someone presents numbers, t
305.
by SkyBelow 2y ago
>a lack of cruelty But doesn't this depend upon your definition of cruelty? I've seen vegans who define raising an animal for the purpose of eating it to be inherently cruel, even if it doesn't suffer any negative treatme
306.
by SkyBelow 2y ago
Is the scientific method, or more generally modern science and how it is distributed to those outside the field, so poorly designed that not disclosing ties invalidates what was communicated? If so, sounds like we shouldn't be relying
307.
by SkyBelow 2y ago
As a once off, with the same context, it giving the same answer doesn't surprise me. What I'm wondering if the behavior when it keeps being asked for another response with the previous responses fed back into it. In this case, a
308.
by SkyBelow 2y ago
Before the recent AI boom, I was mystified by the possibility of AI and emulating humans (in no small part thanks to works of fiction showing AI powered androids). Then I created and trained some neural networks. Smaller ones, doing much
309.
by SkyBelow 2y ago
>Pause capabilities research until we have proven strategies for aligning AI to human safety. If the power of AI deserves this reaction, then governments are in a race to avoid doing this. We might be able to keep it out of the hands of
310.
by SkyBelow 2y ago
If growing food for your own use is interstate commerce, contract law is interstate commerce.
311.
by SkyBelow 3y ago
>If we as a society want to support people having a baseline quality of life, then let's pay for it together rather than pushing it all on employers. Baseline quality of life isn't decided just by pay. I find that society does
312.
by SkyBelow 3y ago
Given the number of possible things wrong with a human that leads to bad behavior, it seems like an extreme claim to suggest that desire to make a change is a necessary component in any successful therapy. Part of therapy can be building t
313.
by SkyBelow 3y ago
You missed the part where I filed the patent first, so I am now the one in charge of USB charged cars. Yes, it is even more complicated than that; I'm just trying to toss out a joke while also pointing out the system is even worse than
314.
by SkyBelow 3y ago
If there is a good library for it within the domain, ideally at some point the AI will suggest it. Can't wait until the AI writes it own library it will reference in future answers.
315.
by SkyBelow 3y ago
I think the field has long had an issue describing the differences between design and implementation, which has only grown worse as more levels of designing and implementing have appeared. It is a bit like explaining the difference, back i
316.
by SkyBelow 3y ago
Isn't a stock buy back equivalent to a reverse stock split with the gains being split between those who want to sell their stock getting immediate money while those who don't get higher value stocks? I've seen a lot of negat
317.
by SkyBelow 3y ago
>The tricky part is that the ongoing training of ever-more-interesting generative AI depends on the ongoing labor of artists. I think there is an ongoing issue. Much like how the privatization of the public domain has led to an ongoin
318.
by SkyBelow 3y ago
I think the open source part is the main justification. Getting kids into tech and programming seems a HN sort of article, and an open source game is one way of doing it. Much more advanced than the entry level things like Scratch Jr. and
319.
by SkyBelow 3y ago
>no matter the medium, or means or relative notoriety of the artist - shall be candidate training data Why is this a special case? When people were viewing it, reposting it, using it to learn... those were all accepted uses. Passing it
320.
by SkyBelow 3y ago
To expand upon this, the majority of the complaints I see are coming from the online community where the largest part of the material seems to be based of IP/copyright violation by the artists. I've been part of multiple communit
321.
by SkyBelow 3y ago
>because "they" (assuming you mean the opportunity provider) I think you read that backwards. The "they" meant the people shutting down the sweatshops. That's why I say "feel they have done good" and
322.
by SkyBelow 3y ago
Betrand paradox (in probability) ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand_paradox_(probability) ) is a great counter example of how you can have a meaningful discussion with a poorly defined question. A bit of a meta ex
323.
by SkyBelow 3y ago
>You most certainly don't take away the sweatshop and watch the family starve. Doesn't history show this is precisely the solution people choose? It makes themselves feel like they have done good, and as for the increased harm
324.
by SkyBelow 3y ago
Yes, there is such an implicit caveat on all of science. Science at its core runs on a repeated process of collect some data, explain it, collect some more data, explain it as well, and keep repeating forever. The scientific model you are
325.
by SkyBelow 3y ago
>originating from a single spot at a single point in time That's based on a simplified model of the big bang which isn't what scientist use. It is everywhere, and time itself isn't defined. One major result of this is th
326.
by SkyBelow 3y ago
This sort of breakdown also reminds me of the explanation of why busy beavers grow faster than anything humans can ever define. Anything a human can define is a finite number of steps that can be represented by some turing machine of size
327.
by SkyBelow 3y ago
If we follow the idea of safety, should we restrict the internet so either such users can safely use the internet (and phones, gift cards, technology in general) without being scammed, or otherwise restrict it so that at risk individuals ca
328.
by SkyBelow 3y ago
Doesn't this lead to the AI only being able to generate content that is legal in every country? That seems like a pretty bad standard and one that might even be impossible to meet given some countries with odd laws against specific th
329.
by SkyBelow 3y ago
With copyright, it applies to the specific work. With patents, it applies to a more general idea. Someone else can't come copyright that same photo later, but could someone else come and patent the method later? If not, then isn&#x2
330.
by SkyBelow 3y ago
Even if this was the origin of the term, it still doesn't make sense because the best engineers can solve problems the worst would never be able to do so. The difference between the best and worst is much more than 10x the worst. May

More ›