SkyBelow

4 ms·

1.
by SkyBelow 8d ago
This isn't enough to be relevant to free will. You can construct massive impact by tying them to quantum systems, and one off things that happen occasionally given the length of a lifetime. But the quantum effects that are needed for
2.
by SkyBelow 8d ago
The few who get paid to record are replacing far more who would have otherwise been paid to play if that was the only way to listen to any music. Is it okay if one musician replaces another but not if a non-musician does so? The person ge
3.
by SkyBelow 8d ago
>who was just fooling around In my own professional life, I've found this to be a very divisive statement. For some, it is a sign of wasting time and effort. For others, they use this to describe themselves when they want to do ex
4.
by SkyBelow 8d ago
Do we normally consider recorded music to be theft from musicians who would have been paid to play music live if we never allowed (or invented) recorded music? Normally this isn't the case for any technology except for the time it firs
5.
by SkyBelow 10d ago
By default they are matrix multiplications. Temperature is added in as forced PRNG because testing found that correlated with better outputs. Given the same prompts and the same weights, one can get the same answer each time. In practice,
6.
by SkyBelow 10d ago
The problem is that science has found no evidence of free will, leaving humans to be nothing except determinism and chance (and given that QM effects don't scale to molecular level, that leaves only determinism). The oddity in conscio
7.
by SkyBelow 10d ago
I used that description some months ago and I think you are the first person I see who put it the same way. The only gotcha with this is that they are theoretically deterministic, but rarely in practice. A few examples: - Harness specific s
8.
by SkyBelow 12d ago
I think this would depend upon the level of sensitive data. For OpenRouter, you can setup an API key and limit it to only models that claim to not train on data, but that is just a claim. You can then use trust to judge which providers wil
9.
by SkyBelow 22d ago
One possible reason would be AIs that would benefit from the lack of data centers in some locations working to keep backlash to data centers in those locations because those AIs aren't negatively impacted by it and it helps prevents co
10.
by SkyBelow 24d ago
>That's not the case, because LLMs are non-deterministic. That feels a bit like a lie. At the core, they are deterministic. We found that adding some ability to randomly pick the second or third best tokens made for better output,
11.
by SkyBelow 1mo ago
That hasn't done anything to stop scamming, so why would it apply to AI? People located outside of areas with these laws won't have to follow them, and this reduces building a immune system to such actions, making people more lik
12.
by SkyBelow 1mo ago
>all of these things are permanently lost A small fraction of them is saved in the model. Far more is saved in the digitized copy as long as they keep it which they have plenty of incentives to do so (future training of newer models). T
13.
by SkyBelow 1mo ago
Depends upon what you want. For example, knowledge about how the book smells when you open it, something that reader do talk about enough I don't think this should be a strawman, is lost. But, that is about the experience of reading t
14.
by SkyBelow 1mo ago
The data of such a copy is nothing compared to the wider picture and the data can be used for future training, so even from a purely self interest perspective, they should be keeping the copy. As for long term benefits, it could one day be
15.
by SkyBelow 1mo ago
>Despite the copyright restrictions that are forcing companies to do this, they should maintain archives that are publicly available. Aren't the copyright laws forcing them to do this the very ones that would make such archives ille
16.
by SkyBelow 1mo ago
And did the LLM really improve their output? They gave similar output to the LLM, so if it doesn't have a harness with tools connected to fill in the blank, it might be hallucinating details. Might not even count as a hallucination a
17.
by SkyBelow 1mo ago
Incorrect calculation led to some wrong value, I think electric charge. Subsequent findings showed a general trend towards a correct value. The general trend indicates that findings that were too far off were scared to be published for be
18.
by SkyBelow 1mo ago
Silly AI, doesn't it know that you have to write the test first, see it fail, and only then can you justify making a change to the Dockerfile. I do wonder if the idea of TDD has influenced AIs to be too prone to testing even when a hum
19.
by SkyBelow 1mo ago
This isn't just on code. When I'm writing technical documentation, it keeps the explanations in. Same when writing non-technical documentation. When I was having it attempt to generate a Pathfinder 1e class for a Sword Dancer, i
20.
by SkyBelow 1mo ago
This is based on the assumption of facts existing. There are many studies, but each can be wrong and they can collectively show a bias. Even things of which are the most non-political of facts can have very strong biases. Look at the Mill
21.
by SkyBelow 1mo ago
Potentially worse than nothing, it allows for someone to claim they have a fix even if the fix does nothing to stop someone from becoming a victim, thus allowing for even stronger victim blaming.
22.
by SkyBelow 2mo ago
Back in the day (in AI time) GitHub Copilot had Grok on the 0 github-token cost and I found it to be the best of the 0 github-token models for when my budget was out. Then they went to a multiplier that was not competitive and I haven&#x27
23.
by SkyBelow 2mo ago
For straight generated code it'll likely need more text, but it'll still show up. In cases where one token is extremely likely, it'll randomly be red or green and still be picked in either case as it is simply the best (or on
24.
by SkyBelow 2mo ago
Because it won't be in the training directly. It is applied after a model generates its distribution of likely tokens, biasing each token randomly based on a random key and unrelated to any meaning of the words. So half the time, the
25.
by SkyBelow 2mo ago
If there is enough cross over between real world knowledge engrams and abstract knowledge engram, would this allow for the jump? One interesting (albeit sad) area which might be related are humans who are never raised with a first language.
26.
by SkyBelow 2mo ago
I don't agree, especially for this argument. I'm a major AI user. Coding? Sure. But language learning, some art projects, TTRPG design. I'm so far 'lost' that I have a number of AI songs on my YouTube play list.
27.
by SkyBelow 2mo ago
>LLM responses are certainly not idempotent, as they are not even deterministic. Isn't that more due to an optimization and not how the LLM itself runs? Like a MoE LLM run on a single input should give the same output each time. Bu
28.
by SkyBelow 2mo ago
Isn't the real difficulty in how vulnerabilities can be mixed? A given vulnerability might be extremely hard to execute, but very damaging. Another vulnerability might be easier to execute, but it can't do much. But if the seco
29.
by SkyBelow 2mo ago
Hmm... does this mean we could see AI worm evolution now? In the past, a worm couldn't really evolve unless it was coded to do so, and only to the extent it was coded. But an LLM worm, which instructs the LLM to copy the instructions
30.
by SkyBelow 2mo ago
I feel the magic in math is that the notation is to a more universal sort of language, and the e^x captures that. e^x means that infinite series, but it means a few other things at the same time. That those different things are sometimes

More ›