3 ms·
>a lack of cruelty But doesn't this depend upon your definition of cruelty? I've seen vegans who define raising an animal for the purpose of eating it to be i
by SkyBelow 2y ago
>a lack of cruelty
But doesn't this depend upon your definition of cruelty? I've seen vegans who define raising an animal for the purpose of eating it to be inherently cruel, even if it doesn't suffer any negative treatment until the day it is killed to be eaten.
Even this is just going with common enough definitions found in modern society. If we expand our scope of what ethics and what views of cruelty are allowed, there is no end to what results we see.
- cogman10 2y agoTotally agree. And I don't fault people for taking such a position about livestock, it's not unreasonable. I don't land there myself but can see why others would. It really just comes down to definitions.