Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
SQueeeeeL
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
61.
▲
by
SQueeeeeL
4y ago
This has historically shown to not be the case. In the modern era, there's rarely any value in a raw idea, but how it affects those who observe it (mainly can it drive them to buy toys). It's been pretty consistently shown people
62.
▲
by
SQueeeeeL
4y ago
Statistican used to be kinda insane wizard figures in a lot of hospitals. Because thinking hard about statistics literally requires you to think really hard about unknowns and simplifying/modeling the entire world using equations. But
63.
▲
by
SQueeeeeL
4y ago
We're unfortunately probably beyond the point of any new copypastas being created. Most of those were created on the "old Internet", where things were pretty small, chaotic, and decentralized. Nowadays, all engagement is prim
64.
▲
by
SQueeeeeL
4y ago
That'd cost shareholders potential revenue. There's no chance of any action that isn't prying it from the hands of those in charge of the company's bottom line
65.
▲
by
SQueeeeeL
4y ago
>it was easier to track how much the currency lost value. I think this is a glamorization of the past. I'll bet most exchange throughout history was being done with some level of fraud baked into the system highly up the chain. Our
66.
▲
by
SQueeeeeL
4y ago
That sounds so convoluted and would never actually be used by regular users as long as more intense options exist (see Mastodon). I'm not sure why it needs to be a right to waste time consuming information about random celebrates and p
67.
▲
by
SQueeeeeL
4y ago
It's just the better choose to wait it out, even if you get divorced, fired, etc. It's the more optimal financial play to treat housing as an asset, and because the US has proven historical to have a wildly fluctuating housing mar
68.
▲
by
SQueeeeeL
4y ago
The Amish kinda slap, they didn't invent addictive social media, put a game show host in charge of nuclear weapons, or have a bunch of corporations change their icons to rainbow icons while still being shitty. They literally realized 3
69.
▲
by
SQueeeeeL
4y ago
There are quite a number, but our primary mechanism for sharing ideas and information are incredibly pro-conglomerate (most large media organizations are the result of decades of mergers). Those in power heavily studied the anti-trust actio
70.
▲
by
SQueeeeeL
4y ago
If all of humanity does get wiped out by climate change, it will be kinda comforting to know that we were basically just smart apes the entire time. Like, we had decades of evidence we were going to all kill ourselves and did nothing, that
71.
▲
by
SQueeeeeL
4y ago
Damn, the top comment on the article is about how you need to lie in tech interviews. How far have we fallen if we don't even have enough dignity to walk away from garbage tier companies who can't even put any real effort into hir
72.
▲
by
SQueeeeeL
4y ago
Based on my read of the article, this just means ads will be surrounding the chat bots, not included within them, which I feel like we all expected given these are products from companies who make shit loads of money selling advertising
73.
▲
by
SQueeeeeL
4y ago
If people have genuine use cases (or even simply have a preferred remembered experience experience for how something complicated works like an elderly person) I see no reason why they "should" upgrade, and why instead we shouldn&#
74.
▲
by
SQueeeeeL
4y ago
Because those skills require actual experience and domain-expertice . You can't factory print MBAs that actually give you skills, but you can create the illusion of value by teaching something , so they throw out a bunch of random
75.
▲
by
SQueeeeeL
4y ago
It's really just amusing that we've spent millions of dollars of fossil fuel and man hours training a toy that's really no better than a petulant child with no better logic
76.
▲
by
SQueeeeeL
4y ago
Good luck to all the future PIP/layoff recipients. If you are one of the employees who just got their first subpar review, I hope you know that it was unavoidable and a business decision to do so, that has nothing to do with your actua
77.
▲
by
SQueeeeeL
4y ago
Yeah, but the train operator "union" is the only one concerned about these factors, and our current cultural beliefs is that union's are greedy, therefore there must not be any train derailments. It's why Fox, NBC, and C
78.
▲
by
SQueeeeeL
4y ago
I think the main thing is Uber has never presented a viable business plan. It's always been showing numbers based on subsidized rides, and is almost a house of cards. If they had started small, grew organically and had always maintai
79.
▲
by
SQueeeeeL
4y ago
I mean, not using bills isn't really a practical solution. Legally dissolving the Fed or making a committee with only the instruction to print money would be better.
80.
▲
by
SQueeeeeL
4y ago
Complaining about the abborant behaviors of individuals belies the actual problem. Even if the FED were all on their "best behavior" we'd still be in a very bad position from the weird mixing of business and government.
81.
▲
by
SQueeeeeL
4y ago
We have no evidence either way. And referring to someone who's weirdly in favor of a multi billion dollar corporate opposed to the rights of individuals at least an agent of that group seems appropriate verbage
82.
▲
by
SQueeeeeL
4y ago
I think it's almost unfathomable for us to imagine how far we are from a "traditional" homosapien life. I read a book called "Hunt, Gather, Parent" where they describe the life of multiple 'less developed'
83.
▲
by
SQueeeeeL
4y ago
I'm not replying in bad faith. It is very obvious that capitalism has always been with us and always will be. If you observe birds long enough, you'll start to see them exchange tokens with each other, but results like that rarely
84.
▲
by
SQueeeeeL
4y ago
Yeah, it's fairly obvious from the fossil records that all humans were using cash back in the tribal nomadic days hundreds of thousands of years ago. There literally has never been any other ways humans have organized other than wage l
85.
▲
by
SQueeeeeL
4y ago
Most Americans probably either don't care or fundamentally disagree with the right of Nazis to say shit, but the legal system prioritizes consistency and their specific brand of morality over the public desire, that's why we hav
86.
▲
by
SQueeeeeL
4y ago
It's actually pretty easy to break out of, historically two party democracies aren't very common. Just need a war or revolution. Now breaking it out of it without majorly messing up things for a lot of the populace, that's a
87.
▲
by
SQueeeeeL
4y ago
This all reads vaguely like justification people often use for one off anecdotes trying to support a whole system. Obviously sometimes things work out, otherwise the system would completely collapse, it's just a matter of ratio and amo
88.
▲
by
SQueeeeeL
4y ago
'Luckily, no accidents have happened yet, so we still have nothing to worry about' -The US Govt
89.
▲
by
SQueeeeeL
4y ago
The thing is most facts will never be "checkable" because the world we exist in is simply too complicated to be fully enumerated. You basically require a simulated mind to even begin to grasp the nuances of fact vs perspective v
90.
▲
by
SQueeeeeL
4y ago
I feel deeply distributed by the modern Christian community's very un-Christ focus on "exclusion". The notion that the divine word does not support itself and we need the approval of "the tech community" is deeply o
More ›