RandVal30142

9 ms·

61.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
Inciting violence has never been a protected form of speech.
62.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
>Don't try to market yourself as critical Internet infrastructure if you're going to throw your principals away because someone made you feel icky. Don't use critical internet infrastructure to wage a campaign of hate and
63.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
He also said this: >“I realized there was no way we were going to have that conversation with people calling us Nazis,” Prince said. “The Daily Stormer site was bragging on their bulletin boards about how Cloudflare was one of them and t
64.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
Not sure why you are quoting earlier content instead of Cloudflare's statement on this particular matter. From today: >Our terms of service reserve the right for us to terminate users of our network at our sole discretion. The tippi
65.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
>We are not on the precipice of war, no matter what the MSM would have you think It is not "MSM" stating anything like this but the Nazis. This is Matthew Heimbach, the Nazi who attacked someone during a Trump rally[1], cheerin
66.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
>new users cannot downvote Huh. No you didnt misunderstand me I think I was just mistaken in what new users could do. Is there a known age threshold when voting kicks in?
67.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
I'm not commenting on the trainwreck that is the open commentary(ha), but specifically the spree downvotes on inane or just plain informative comments. Haven't really seen activity like that in other threads unless they are bringi
68.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
Some people here seem to have a real hard-on for white power. They've been spree downvoting critical & informative commentary on the topic.
69.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
A site to watch is Rootbocks. They have been the fundraising site of choice for white nationalists & Nazis involved in violence. The latest fundraiser is from the Nazis involved in the murder of Heather Heyer[1]. One of those attending
70.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
This is a Nazi site that regularly urged on violence against 'leftists & Jews' then later after Charlotteville called the Nazi's murder victim a slut.
71.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
>Net, the newsies want violence. No that would be the Nazis shouting slogans about purging Jews.
72.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
Blockstream jumps the shark.
73.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
If anyone involved in Rootbocks is reading this. I reported you to your host last night. You will be treated like sites hosting malware, with hosts themselves severing ties ASAP before you taint their IP space. Cheers.
74.
Rootbocks, raising funds for the Charlottesville Nazis, removed from it's host(twitter.com)
3 points by RandVal30142 9y ago|1 comments
75.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
... what?
76.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
>Bluntly the newsies want violence, dead people The Nazis do. This is why they stabbed people in Seattle, this is why they called it a war, this is why one of them ran down civil demonstrators.
77.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
>He's trying to calm people down and save lives. Just today Trump retweeted an image of a train running down a CNN reporter. The guy is a fascist lunatic who constantly eggs on his base into violence.
78.
Scott Paul Resigning from Trump's Manufacturing Jobs Initiative(twitter.com)
2 points by RandVal30142 9y ago|0 comments
79.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
>a simple glance Show the damned transactions. > with knowledge of notable events The claim was very specific, show the damned transactions. >i don't really care that i can't convince you Because you can't show what
80.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
No seriously, show the transactions you consider to be spam. Classify them in some tangible way, then identify the users behind them. The specific claim was that it was from "Roger Ver and his cronies," not that a mempool backlog
81.
Intel CEO leaves American Manufacturing Council(blogs.intel.com)
285 points by RandVal30142 9y ago|371 comments
82.
CEOs of Merck, Under Armour and Intel Resign from Trump's Business Council(npr.org)
1 points by RandVal30142 9y ago|1 comments
83.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
>Roger and his cronies were spamming the network for months For fucks sake. Show the "spam," track it to an individual. The blockchain is transparent yet no one has done this. This is what my other comment was about. Named user
84.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
> It's development has been taken over by a group of mentally unstable developers with weird personal agendas and beliefs. They literally want to edit Satoshi's bitcoin whitepaper[1]. One of the supporters of editing the paper
85.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
Reported. edit: Response from support: "Hi xxxxx. This account is not affiliated with GitHub and we are looking into it."
86.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
That we've identified how this human behavior yields improper enforcement of law and try to take measures to guard against it is a good sign. Never-ending fight I imagine though.
87.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
>despite being downvoted Ain't no thang but a chicken wang. I have a few deep biases against the Russian govt for reasons I won't delve into here. Despite this I believe in extradition laws as a tool of enforcement beyond borde
88.
Research at Google: Tracking Ransomware End-To-End [pdf](blackhat.com)
2 points by RandVal30142 9y ago|0 comments
89.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
> If you start a gay social network in US, can Russia come in (the first time you are flying in one of the Russia's partners territories) and say "you are breaking Russian gay laws, you are under arrest"? Yes.
90.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
What makes it even worse is they carried this over into a support FAQ stating the OS didn't come with an antivirus because X-security features. If anyone remembers the vintage of this I'd love to dig an archived copy up.

More ›