Oletros

65 ms·

691.
by Oletros 10y ago
Google bought Android in 2005. There was no signs of Apple on mobile by then
692.
by Oletros 10y ago
Google didn't forked Java
693.
by Oletros 10y ago
I'm very happy with my Android devices and I was very happy with my iOS device
694.
by Oletros 10y ago
Is so slow the chip processsing in the USA? Here in Spain is very fast
695.
by Oletros 10y ago
Thanks for the explanation. Can the members of the marriage(spouses?) change that? Here in Spain some autonomous communities (like the states in USA) have community property as default and some others have asset separation as default but wh
696.
by Oletros 10y ago
Why do you asume is communal and not property of one of them?
697.
by Oletros 10y ago
So, no citation and just a bunch of opinion. Thanks
698.
by Oletros 10y ago
> but I can see why the corrupt unelected EU officials don't want them Can you give any proof of those corruptions? And, by the way, calling them unelected is a good way of showing a lack of knowledge about the EU
699.
by Oletros 10y ago
> Sure, what a better move from an organization that is more and more compared to the USSR than completely ignore the result of a direct consultation of the citizens Are you talking about UK?
700.
by Oletros 10y ago
> and the EU continues its legacy of greed, stupidity and incompetence in every area it involves itself i Citation needed
701.
by Oletros 10y ago
> Google bought Motorola and its patents the same year and sued Microsoft Google bought Motorola and continued the lawsuits already started by them
702.
by Oletros 10y ago
> and I'd be happy(ish) to pay google 10 bucks a month if they promised not to sell my information on the side. They don't have to do that because Google doesn't sell any data
703.
by Oletros 10y ago
> If it turns around and says "we will give those countries tariff-free access to our markets but not the UK" this will send a powerful message to all EU citizens that this is not an organisation with their best interests at he
704.
by Oletros 10y ago
> If the EU was more like a standards body that simply recommended laws instead of mandating their implementation, there would be no need for allowing alternatives to be seen as "compromise" \ Then why have an EU? The problem f
705.
by Oletros 10y ago
> But the EU sees Brexit as a betrayal that must be punished severely to try and scare other countries into not leaving. No, don't having the same deal while outside of the EU is not punishing.
706.
by Oletros 10y ago
> "if it was hard to write, it should be hard to understand" Isn't Torvalds doing just the contrary in this case? He advocates for easy to read and understand comments
707.
by Oletros 10y ago
> This could happen if the foundations of the theory are not questioned often. If they are taken as axioms, then the rest of the system follows from it. And is this what is happening with climate science? > He is offering a very speci
708.
by Oletros 10y ago
Yes, scientists make mistakes but it is very strange that almost all scientists can be mistaken for decades like the author of this lecture is implying. If there was some real and credible alternative to the consensus and this alternative w
709.
by Oletros 10y ago
> Since he was a legend in the eco-movement, his current assessment is credible and authoritative. Eeehh, no. And the rest of his lecture is the same things debunked time ago
710.
Do You Really Need a Dedicated Graphics Card to Play Your Favorite Games?(motherboard.vice.com)
17 points by Oletros 10y ago|15 comments
711.
by Oletros 10y ago
> and the "provider" makes money by selling data they have harvested from your interactions. Which provider sell your data?
712.
by Oletros 10y ago
Can you link to any paper were I can see that the temperature rising is not related to CO2 but to water? If not, can you link to any paper with an alternative theory to the temperature growing that is not related to greenhouse gases? Thanks
713.
by Oletros 10y ago
> If you eat meat while failing to accept the impact your choices have, you not only are contributing to the problem, you are a climate change denier. Any quantity of meat, any type of meat? It is the same eating cow and pork in every me
714.
by Oletros 10y ago
Is the amount of water in the atmosphere growing?
715.
by Oletros 10y ago
Are so different the stats in the EU countries? If we take the whole EU dat, will differ too much from taking the different countries?
716.
by Oletros 10y ago
> You think that sharing pictures of people under 18, who have given the implicit notion that these are private pictures, is ok? Do you have problems with reading comprehension? Tell me were the heck I have said that it is good to share
717.
by Oletros 10y ago
No, the one being part of the problem is the one that thinks that everyone is a sex offender independently of the situation. A 18 year old having sex with his/her 17 years old partner IS NOT A sex offender You're the one thinking
718.
by Oletros 10y ago
> But when you're in the position that you're an 18yo with nude pictures of a minor, you do effectively have child porn I would like to know why you're so radical in this topic. Perhaps because I'm not American and at
719.
by Oletros 10y ago
Common sense doesn't work to gather actual data
720.
by Oletros 10y ago
How is having sex as a teenager a serious offense?

More ›