> This could happen if the foundations of the theory are not questioned often. If they are taken as axioms, then the rest of the system follows from it. And is

> This could happen if the foundations of the theory are not questioned often. If they are taken as axioms, then the rest of the system follows from it. And is this what is happening with climate science? > He is offering a very specific prediction, although extremely difficult to verify: > What is the standard counter-argument to these points? Are all false? Why should exists a counter argument? He is the one making this claims, he should publish papers supporting his claims. And until now, there is none.