4 ms·
Do You Really Need a Dedicated Graphics Card to Play Your Favorite Games?
- probably_wrong 10y agoAlternative title: "here's an ad for Intel's new computer disguised as an article, and one paragraph about Overwatch"
- Avshalom 10y agoright, not even one mention of AMD which until very recently (if even now, I haven't seen the actual benchmarks) has been beating Intel's embedded offerings hands down for years.
- frou_dh 10y agoIs this what they call Native Advertising?
- spacehome 10y agoThis is what they call "The Submarine". http://www.paulgraham.com/submarine.html http://www.paulgraham.com/submarine.html
- dublinben 10y agoNo, this[0] is native advertising for Intel. The differences are there. [0] http://motherboard.vice.com/blog/to-protect-privacy-one-developer-aims-to-design-a-more-decentralized-internet http://motherboard.vice.com/blog/to-protect-privacy-one-deve...
- Pica_soO 10y agoYes
- jkot 10y agoIn many cases the dedicated graphic is cheaper than integrated. Intel Iris comes in more expensive processors which are not necessary for games. You might pay extra $300 on great CPU with integrated card, over slower CPU with dedicated GPU. For example I saved $280 on my Dell XPS 13. It only has Intel HD Graphics 520 compared to Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580. CPU is same, except 100MHz clock.
- JanneVee 10y agoAt what screen resolution?
- Fej 10y agoYes. Skull Canyon is overpriced anyway.
- falcolas 10y agoWith all due respect to the author, I do not consider "Overwatch was a completely playable 30+ FPS" to be acceptable for a PC shooter. It may be the bare minimum required to play, but not usually an enjoyable experience; it ends up being a janky, stuttering mess.
- marak830 10y agoI honestly don't believe I could stand any fps at 30 frames. Look I'm not in the 120hrz only way to play camp, but I really notice if I drop under 55-60, and it makes me frustrated. This may be tied into the movement being much rougher at this point.
- Negative1 10y agoI believe in industry parlance this is called an Advertorial (an advertisement dressed as an editorial). I didn't see a disclaimer though so either they are being dishonest with their audience or very tone deaf. The NUC seems more like a Mac Mini than a real desktop PC and comparing it to a gaming PC is just strange. Despite their argument, yes, if you want to play games at optimal graphics and performance levels you DO still need a discrete GPU. Even game consoles (which require a fast data bus) have a discrete GPU despite their (usually) unified memory architecture.
- dublinben 10y agoIntel is one of their current advertisers/sponsors, but those articles are clearly marked with a banner and the "sponsored" tag. This article does not appear to be directly paid for. http://motherboard.vice.com/tag/sponsored http://motherboard.vice.com/tag/sponsored
- soared 10y agoBetteridge's law would disagree. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headlines https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headline...
- oxide 10y agoIntegrated offerings from Intel have always been substandard. Claiming someone can make due with 30fps in a competitve fps shows a glaring level of ignorance from the author. Can you play with 30fps? Yes. You can also play with a blindfold on and a hand tied behind your back. Given the choice, why play at a distinct, undeniable disadvantage?