3 ms·
> But when you're in the position that you're an 18yo with nude pictures of a minor, you do effectively have child porn I would like to know why you're so radi
by Oletros 10y ago
> But when you're in the position that you're an 18yo with nude pictures of a minor, you do effectively have child porn
I would like to know why you're so radical in this topic. Perhaps because I'm not American and attitude to sex here is not so puritan I can't understand it.
In the beach promenade we have a nudist beach, two meters apart, everyone, including child can see nude men and women, or other child, and nobody cares about it, they see it as normal.
I can see a lot of women breastfeeding in public and nobody cares.
The charges someone can face for peeing in the street is for uncivic behaviour (normally 30€), but they are not charged for a sexual offense.
> A non trivial number of these pictures do end up on the internet. Do you think that you should be a sex offender if as an 18yo you disseminate a picture of your 16yo partner?
You're always taking the worst case. The problem is when your 18 years old have pictures in his phone of his 17 years old partner and he/she is guilty of having sex porn.
- nostrebored 10y agoYou think that sharing pictures of people under 18, who have given the implicit notion that these are private pictures, is ok? Because please dear god tell me that you're talking about the peeing in the street or something, and that was just a poor quote placement? There's a difference between going to a nude beach, where you have an expectation of nudity vs. being in the street and taking out your penis. If you're doing this repeatedly, then you have been repeatedly exposing your genitals to people who have not consented to the exposure. There's a gigantic difference. Nudity and being happy with your body and happy with the body of others is fine. The thing about nude beaches is that they are not sexual. People are not creepy at nude beaches. I'm asking you to engage in a thought experiment. I'm wondering where the line for child porn begins and ends for you -- because its complicated is just not a fine argument when it comes to legal systems. I think that judges should use discretion when it comes down to cases like the one you're talking about, but they only have to use discretion because it is still child pornography by definition.
- Oletros 10y ago> You think that sharing pictures of people under 18, who have given the implicit notion that these are private pictures, is ok? Do you have problems with reading comprehension? Tell me were the heck I have said that it is good to share the pictures?