Nowado

14 ms·

91.
by Nowado 4y ago
> at a personal level: have you ever tried to put in practice "highly skilled, non-naive good faith communication" ? If you did, you've probably noted that more often than not, it doesn't make you weaker. It increases
92.
by Nowado 4y ago
There seems to be an assumption that the opponent isn't a competent player. They might be. The winning move is to seem like the winning side of discourse in their space. The truly winning move is to own a media conglomerate including s
93.
by Nowado 4y ago
Addressing your opponent position lets them pick what the topic is. They are picking a topic their position is strong at. Therefore addressing your opponent position in limited-attention setting (aka publicly) is simply a losing move.
94.
by Nowado 4y ago
Article doesn't move us forward even an inch. If the solution was providing people with a list of bad faith tactics we would have been done with it at least twice by now: first when Socrates was arguing with Sophists 2500 years ago and
95.
by Nowado 5y ago
Most likely, almost verbatim, to that video specifically https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPHPNgIihR0
96.
by Nowado 5y ago
Surprisingly pleasant. I haven't speed read in a while, but this felt better than highlighting text, or centering word on screen (although those work better with audio support, but I guess that could be mixed together). Few questions:
97.
by Nowado 5y ago
You mean, the issue with child gambling these days is that there's no promise of a big pay out?
98.
by Nowado 5y ago
You have about 48h to be the first to put it in a mobile app store if you're into that. Cool concept!
99.
by Nowado 5y ago
It's truly amazing what you can get done with few hours of spare time and a central bank.
100.
by Nowado 5y ago
Yeah, not GPUs, maybe cars, surely fridges.
101.
by Nowado 5y ago
Their loss is my (consumer) gain or am I missing something important?
102.
by Nowado 5y ago
The only thing I noticed on SO is sometimes having question titled in a more general way, with details being actually focused on a specific new framework, then discussion and answer showing how amazing the framework is for this use case. Wh
103.
by Nowado 5y ago
It's an improvement, even though it's going to be gamed as well. That said, I have no idea how you would do it. More specifically, 1) I see almost everything as an ad, 2) you're going to get an extremely biased internet and l
104.
by Nowado 5y ago
Marketer perspective: you can not build a communication tool you find useful that won't end up being used to make money. It will get figured out. I could go into a bit more philosophical angle with reterritorialization done by capital,
105.
by Nowado 5y ago
The HN page.
106.
by Nowado 5y ago
'I could fix it over a weekend' is pretty much the motto of this page.
107.
by Nowado 5y ago
Thanks! Surprisingly low honestly.
108.
by Nowado 5y ago
I do this too, but that behaviour has zero way of noticing false negatives.
109.
by Nowado 5y ago
Out of curiosity, if you could update if the members count grows noticeably after posting link here that'd be nice.
110.
by Nowado 5y ago
That's the point of Fisher and those before him, isn't it? Counter culture gets recuperated. New terrain becomes deterritorialized and reterritorialized. Edge becomes fashionable and popular. Even if we knew what would, would that
111.
by Nowado 5y ago
I will also preface by saying, that there very much is an issue with having for-profit (mental) health system. That said, I don't think what you're pointing at goes beyond issue of monopolization (giving one side of the market rel
112.
by Nowado 5y ago
Their incentive system looks the same as any for-profit mental health organization. Not saying that solves it, I just don't see why would apps worry you particularly much in context of issues you're pointing out.
113.
by Nowado 5y ago
By the definition of 'social mobility'. That's how quantiles work.
114.
by Nowado 5y ago
> Twitter-famous (...) anonymous Now, I'm not agreeing with parent comment in sentiment that this is all, or most, of what's happening (although introducing scarcity for the sake of it has to be related to creating perceivabl
115.
by Nowado 5y ago
I too avoid using Google services not to dull my internal something.
116.
by Nowado 5y ago
In what other way could JS be an option than it is now?
117.
by Nowado 5y ago
The absolute future of a proprietary service-specific history.
118.
by Nowado 5y ago
How is it different from, well, Google Alerts?
119.
by Nowado 5y ago
You probably want something slightly different. Fast-slow is one dimension, but pretty strong cognitive psychology research points at complexity (or even cognitive load more precisely, like new genres and off-tempo music). You can mix the t
120.
by Nowado 5y ago
It's a user experience issue and it's hard to solve. You can't possibly expect people to come back to one of their SO tabs AFTER they get code to work.

More ›