> Twitter-famous (...) anonymous Now, I'm not agreeing with parent comment in sentiment that this is all, or most, of what's happening (although introducing sc

> Twitter-famous (...) anonymous Now, I'm not agreeing with parent comment in sentiment that this is all, or most, of what's happening (although introducing scarcity for the sake of it has to be related to creating perceivable value through inaccessibility), but if someone is twitter-famous, they are not anonymous. They are twitter-famous. There's nothing stopping one from identifying strongly with their handles or wallets.