Narkov

24 ms·

91.
by Narkov 5y ago
For context, their total city revenue for FY22 is $1.8b. Not passing judgement either way, but at what point should this be reportable?
92.
by Narkov 5y ago
He will almost certainly collect none of it which makes the process largely useless unfortunately. These are shell companies that will never pay up.
93.
by Narkov 5y ago
> The wind fields around fires are not unpredictable. They are on a drone scale (the purpose of my comment) and you've acknowledged this yourself: > but also can have significant eddies induced by the fire, landscape, and vegetat
94.
by Narkov 5y ago
> - The airspace around a bush fire is a particularly hostile environment. This is a good point. Bushfires are also largely caused by high winds that are unpredictable. It makes drones carrying heavy fire retarding payloads a very diffic
95.
by Narkov 5y ago
> equipment isn't catching up to IPv6 <citation required> It's not equipment...it's purely a financial business decision that this hasn't happened yet.
96.
by Narkov 5y ago
^ this. You need to have a high WAF - wife acceptance factor. Another analogy is that grandma needs to be able to stay in the house and not need a computer science degree. Your home automation system is a complimentary enhancement to a trad
97.
by Narkov 5y ago
I would have thought it is a dying market. Sample size of one but I probably print 10 pages a year now.
98.
by Narkov 5y ago
If that freaks you out, what until you hear about tech start-ups these days!!
99.
by Narkov 5y ago
Forget flashing lights. Why would the car not stop or even slow down when a large immovable object is within impact distance? Auto-brake has been around for a decade now.
100.
by Narkov 5y ago
> You were part of the lucky 1% who make it through the program from application to funding,congrats! People aren't selected at random. There isn't any luck involved. It's hard work. I feel it's diminishing peoples a
101.
by Narkov 5y ago
> This seems like a tactic to bring in more money This is every business decision! It's great that Toyota has measured the improvement in customer trust or loyalty being more valuable to them in the long run than shirking on quality
102.
by Narkov 6y ago
It's always DNS!
103.
by Narkov 6y ago
It's always DNS!
104.
by Narkov 6y ago
FinTech doesn't always mean global mega bank. There's lots of small scale start-ups that fit into the financial services category that wouldn't/couldn't afford full time InfoSec roles. Outsourced CISO/InfoSec i
105.
by Narkov 6y ago
With net assets increasing at a similar rate, I don't see this as a problem.
106.
by Narkov 6y ago
It's always DNS!
107.
by Narkov 6y ago
Worse off. Feeding their family is probably a higher priority than a shitty job. It doesn't change the fact that the job is rubbish.
108.
by Narkov 6y ago
I don't know you circumstances but it is possible to still do something out of desperation - possibly to feed your family - and hate it.
109.
by Narkov 6y ago
> Imagine if a company the size of Amazon had a breach? Is it hard to imagine? Does it really matter anymore? There are [non-Amazon] breaches every few years with 100m+ records. It will happen and people will be shocked and outraged and
110.
by Narkov 6y ago
Nit pick...but in a binary decision (yes/no), the margin is only 9% as every loss on one side is a gain on the other. For example, a 9% swing results in a tie.
111.
by Narkov 6y ago
> A reason very simple, you don't want a short through the clock to set your space, or aircraft on fire! Why not use a simple fuse?
112.
by Narkov 6y ago
> Thanks to a student from Boston University who came up with some pretty cool techniques, we can cover devices effectively without having to teach the fuzzer about each device's registers. Can I ask who this was and is there any mo
113.
by Narkov 6y ago
Of course sovereignty and overall data security should be considered. My point is that a blanket "no outsourcing" rule is daft and counterproductive.
114.
by Narkov 6y ago
Increasing the sample rate will still reduce the noise.
115.
by Narkov 6y ago
This is an inefficient use of government money to in-source everything. If private industry can do something cheaper and more effective, use common sense.
116.
by Narkov 6y ago
I would assume the administrator cares enough about their own data to want to do it properly.
117.
by Narkov 6y ago
With no segregation, you crack one service you get access to all 25 services and their data. With segregation, you crack one service you get access to just that container/physical service.
118.
by Narkov 6y ago
Sounds like a dream to compromise! Rather than one attack surface, there's like 25. Crack one and you take the lot.
119.
by Narkov 6y ago
Bought! Too cheap though...double, or even triple the price.
120.
by Narkov 6y ago
Got a link for the USB oscilloscope?

More ›