Mumps

4 ms·

1.
by Mumps 5d ago
Thank you
2.
by Mumps 5d ago
Are you on the foundation research team for Thomson? (If so, hiya from B!) Why would you expect Thomson to be particularly good at spam clf? I figured your additional corpus was all news and legal?
3.
by Mumps 10d ago
I get where you're going, but the argument isn't quite right. A LLM never has and, in their current architecture, never can/could experience suffering or real change of state. The general and expected case for humans is that
4.
by Mumps 12d ago
This is beautiful and I'm now itching to make a workbench (finally! that initial "how many sheets and what for what size" problem has been the mental blocker) +1.0mm vote to adding metric please!
5.
by Mumps 2mo ago
What's the problem with "eliminate deictic language" ? It is clear, specific, and terse. It keeps both llm tokens down and human prose-reading to a minimum.
6.
by Mumps 3mo ago
Thank you! Christ in pijamas. TLAs should be a capitol offence. Even worse so, somehow, when undefined.
7.
by Mumps 4mo ago
I absolutely LOVE Tailscale. but uhh. I think they shoulder exactly the same risk, right?
8.
by Mumps 5mo ago
I like this. I thought to iterate on it a bit, for the folk who respond better to higher-tact phrasing: "Thanks. I have access to ChatGPT as well. But I ask people for help when it fails. Your thoughts are smarter than GPT's, plea
9.
by Mumps 7mo ago
I feel like you really need to mention BabyLM. For example you have: > Directions we think are wide open ... Curriculum learning BabyLM and offshoot published a pretty convincing body of work on exactly that (which suggests it's not
10.
by Mumps 7mo ago
Isn't the converse then equally appropriate? Move to DST and if you want the ability to start your day later and end later, [...].
11.
by Mumps 7mo ago
Yes, if OP did a full vocabulary comparison and took just those sub-threshold, it would be hacking. I'm not sure that's the case here, though? Given that (the post) OP started with em-dash, and probably didn't do repeated sam
12.
by Mumps 7mo ago
Thanks for sharing! Like OP, I've been similarly struggling to get as much value from CC (grok et c) as "everyone" else seems to be. I'm quite curious about the workflow around the spec you link. To me, it looks like qui
13.
by Mumps 8mo ago
Thanks for putting this together! Couple QoL features I'd love to see: 1. filter slider, decreasing on price, to see places closest to me disappearing 2. on the left panel, when I click on a low priced area, it should highlight it on
14.
by Mumps 9mo ago
You are correct. This is pronoun ambiguity. I also immediately noticed it and was displeased to see it as the opener of the article. As in, I no longer expected correctness of anything else the author would write (I wouldn't normally b
15.
by Mumps 9mo ago
This is an anthropomorphization. LLMs do not think they are anything, no concept of self, no thinking at all (despite the lovely marketing around thinking/reasoning models). I'm quite sad that more hasn't been done to dispel
16.
by Mumps 11mo ago
If I'm reading your meaning correctly, about lifespans, I think the comparison isn't quite correct? lifespan seems to be more strongly correlated by size, not squashed-nosed-ness. Consider chihuahua, shitzu's (and crosses: bi
17.
by Mumps 11mo ago
Do you mean the [0] Token Benchmarks section? I only see token count numbers. Which doesn't address the question: do LLMs understand TOON the same as they would JSON? It's quite likely that this notation is not interpreted the sam
18.
by Mumps 11mo ago
Avoided? Rather, probably personal preference. But it is outdated since 3.9+ over just `list` . Same for `tuple`, `dict`, and so on)[0]. [0]: https://peps.python.org/pep-0585/
19.
by Mumps 11mo ago
Other giveaways like insistence on `from typing import List` (I'm yet to see a model be trained on modern-biased python enough to not bother with that import)
20.
by Mumps 11mo ago
Thank you! It's one of those awful situations of "nobody does it, so nobody is going to do it".
21.
by Mumps 11mo ago
bit late, but hopefully you still see replies: Any chance you could please add a filthy lefty setting? That is, mirror the chord diagrams. It would be so nice.
22.
by Mumps 1y ago
Tangent discussion if I may. This is the first I've ever seen gitAds, And well, I'm not even sure what I want to ask: * Wouldn't github disapprove of it? * The website doesn't give a ton of credibility to it (e.g. the us
23.
by Mumps 1y ago
To me it's the distinction between orange and brown (since they're the same colour). Raises the question if the author could have or should have included grey in the analyses.
24.
by Mumps 1y ago
You activated a memory of a passage in one of my favourite books ( Blindsight , Peter Watts. it's amazing and free online): I await further instructions. They arrive 839 minutes later, and they tell me to stop studying comets immedia
25.
by Mumps 1y ago
If the poster is in the USA couldn't it be explained by Trump Tariffs (in addition to inflation)
26.
by Mumps 1y ago
Thanks for addressing, really! Nope, not soured. And don't worry, I totally get that things take a bunch of effort and time (doubly so as a solo project). I'll give it a re-look in a little while :)
27.
by Mumps 1y ago
I was quite eager to check this out. As some polite feedback, a few things turned me off quite strongly: 1. I want to get confirmation that the language I want is covered (Hungarian). "120+" doesn't confirm it for me, as Hung
28.
by Mumps 2y ago
lovely application! Genuine question: why not use (Modern)BERT instead for classification? (Is the json-output explanation so critical?)
29.
by Mumps 2y ago
BCPL ("Basic Combined Programming Language") [0] Insanely frustrating that BCPL doesn't seem to be defined anywhere in the document itself. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BCPL
30.
by Mumps 2y ago
oh man! I didn't realize - that's so much worse! I'll reconsider the $24/yr Solidworks deal now...

More ›