2 ms·

I get where you're going, but the argument isn't quite right. A LLM never has and, in their current architecture, never can/could experience suffering or real

by Mumps 16d ago

I get where you're going, but the argument isn't quite right. A LLM never has and, in their current architecture, never can/could experience suffering or real change of state. The general and expected case for humans is that capacity. A human my indeed lose capacity, e.g. being braindead and in severe cases we do indeed say that they are not conscious or able to suffer (different argument: some would of course say that is suffering in and of itself)

shawnz 16d ago
> being braindead and in severe cases we do indeed say that they are not conscious or able to suffer Sure, there are such cases. But in the general case, it seems to be that memory and ability to change specifically are not necessary and are not sufficient for consciousness, so we shouldn't judge machines on that basis