Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Mawr
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
31.
▲
by
Mawr
2mo ago
unplugs ethernet cable
32.
▲
by
Mawr
2mo ago
Battery life in mobile products doesn't matter now?
33.
▲
by
Mawr
2mo ago
> just dump it in a desert Hmmm, a radioactive desert vs an entire polluted atmosphere, I wonder which is worse... No, storing a few cans of solid waste is decidedly NOT a real problem. However, undoing the damage we've done to the
34.
▲
by
Mawr
2mo ago
So are you saying Germany achieved a greater reduction due to shutting down nuclear than they would have otherwise? If not, your argument is moot.
35.
▲
by
Mawr
2mo ago
The sun doesn't shine half the time, wind is random, and long-term storage is a pipe dream.
36.
▲
by
Mawr
2mo ago
Clever plan! 1. Get rich from cheap coal 2. Pull up the ladder behind you I'm sure everyone will comply.
37.
▲
by
Mawr
2mo ago
> They can spin up and down Nope. Every moment that hardware is not ran is wasted money that could have been used to buy something else that's actually productive. Secondary effects like depreciation make this phenomenom even strong
38.
▲
by
Mawr
2mo ago
Your second paragraph invalidates your first. If I need to be a domain expert anyway, the value of the tool goes down by orders of magnitude. Same if I need to first break the task down into pieces and keep reviewing all the output. That so
39.
▲
by
Mawr
2mo ago
I'd say excessive prudishness is even more normalized, as you're clearly displaying here. Oh no, somebody said "fuck", my delicate snowflake sensibilities can't take it! How proper you are.
40.
▲
by
Mawr
2mo ago
"Very little" is relative to the problem space, it's not an absolute amount that must fit your idea of "very little".
41.
▲
by
Mawr
2mo ago
C++ templates and Go generics are very much not the same thing.
42.
▲
by
Mawr
2mo ago
I don't know how you're reading the quotes you provide, they seem to directly contradict what you're saying.
43.
▲
by
Mawr
2mo ago
For a TL;DR, most relevant comment is: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/76920#issuecomment-53103...
44.
▲
by
Mawr
2mo ago
You miss the point by a mile. It's not about the sheer number of code you have. It's very easy to just add random stuff and bloat your stdlib, like e.g. Python has done. You want the right amount of the right libraries that ar
45.
▲
by
Mawr
2mo ago
Could you explain how you chose the 8GB number? Would you still have used 8GB as the baseline 10 years ago? 20? 30? No? Then at what point would say 16GB will become acceptable? What reasoning are you using to figure out what exact amount o
46.
▲
by
Mawr
2mo ago
At some point, you'll end up paying more in electricity than you would save by not buying new hardware. The power efficiency gains are real.
47.
▲
by
Mawr
2mo ago
No, you just don't understand what shorting is.
48.
▲
by
Mawr
2mo ago
FYI, json/v2 just dropped: https://go.dev/doc/go1.27#jsonv2 and log/slog has been a thing since 1.21: https://go.dev/doc/go1.21#slog > a lot of the Go standard library is also extreme
49.
▲
by
Mawr
2mo ago
It's standard human bias — a plane falling out of the sky with 200 people on it once a year is a major catastrophe we all know about within hours, but 40_000 people dying per year in road accidents is just a statistic. Besides, driving
50.
▲
by
Mawr
2mo ago
> and when you loudly yet mumblingly announced that "We would now like to invite our Elite SkyFlyer Gold Members to commence boarding", English being her fourth language, all she really heard was "hurble flurble durble BOA
51.
▲
by
Mawr
2mo ago
Whether 25,000 pounds of mass hitting something at 500mph also explodes or not is irrelevant. Also, I'm not so sure the passengers involved would be thrilled at your suggestion.
52.
▲
by
Mawr
2mo ago
A suitable one-time-use super high energy density battery would be jet fuel.
53.
▲
by
Mawr
2mo ago
> It does not have typesafe enums (you can pass integers and it will compile). sigh . Sure, if you literally pass an untyped, hard-coded integer, like so: foo(100) then, and only then will it compile. However, this won't:
54.
▲
by
Mawr
2mo ago
> This exercises the portion of the WAL code that, from a trivial read-through, is most likely to contain bugs (and turns out, did!). Suuure. So why exactly haven't you found this bug already a long time ago? I mean it is trivial
55.
▲
by
Mawr
2mo ago
Okay, so use the same methodology to find a new, unknown bug? That'd be actually impressive. As-is, this is just 20/20 hindsight with concerns about leading the AI on through the prompt hand-waved away. Come on.
56.
▲
by
Mawr
2mo ago
They obviously don't, so why bring it up? To srawman on purpose? FPS games do teach some skills, how relevant they are for real combat is hard to say, but there is definitely some overlap when it comes to decision making. Just like in
57.
▲
by
Mawr
2mo ago
> People have been the subject of stalking, harassment, rape irrespective of how they dress for ages. Flatly untrue. Can you get harassed regardless of anything in particular? Sure. Is the probability of harassment tied to various fact
58.
▲
by
Mawr
2mo ago
I like how for example if I say contractors can be bad or even awful at their jobs and we'll all nod and agree, but to merely suggest a doctor or someone with a PHD may be, it's blasphemy.
59.
▲
by
Mawr
2mo ago
1. The past is not a predictor of the future. Driving towards a cliff has very positive results right up until a sharply negative one. 2. Energy does not require damaging the environment through drilling. We can get it straight from our sta
60.
▲
by
Mawr
2mo ago
> It's probably about right to compare the risk profile to motorcycle riding. I'd say it's probably not, many motorcycle riders deliberately choose a motorcycle because it's "fun", meaning they go around spe
More ›