Mawr

5 ms·

61.
by Mawr 3mo ago
Never get married, man...
62.
by Mawr 3mo ago
Knowledge is irrelevant. Idk why you'd think dust would be a problem too, that's also comparatively trivial. Health and safety is also a good one, lol. It all comes down to robots being unable to hold and operate anything in 3d sp
63.
by Mawr 3mo ago
I'd say it's at least two. Driving a car is fairly straightforward, the problems are all tractable. Can't imagine where I'd even start with automating the work of an electrician. Even something as basic as robots grabbin
64.
by Mawr 3mo ago
Yeah, it would have been way better not to have an alarm, and instead make it appear like the car broke down. Could even maybe somehow actually break it programmatically.
65.
by Mawr 3mo ago
> When he finally provided a passcode, the phone appeared to restart. The defense motion states that "the screen went blank, flashed several times, and the phone appeared to restart," resulting in the loss of data. Tsk, amateur
66.
by Mawr 3mo ago
> A computer is "flying" the F-16 all the time anyway. It's a statically unstable aircraft. Ugh... I... Are you serious? Sure, in some sense AI is a computer and the fancy state machine that compensates for inherent flight
67.
by Mawr 3mo ago
5 year olds on balance bikes are endangering pedestrians?
68.
by Mawr 3mo ago
I use it as a dashcam.
69.
by Mawr 3mo ago
Creating accurate assembly instructions is surprisingly difficult. To be able to create them, you have to know how to assemble the product, BUT that also means you've been blessed by the curse of knowledge — now you have to perfectly s
70.
by Mawr 3mo ago
Your statement is so broad that it cannot be true.
71.
by Mawr 3mo ago
Hahahah. Do you seriously just take random objects deep underwater and expect them to be designed to withstand that sort of an environment? Was the GoPro you bought rated up to that depth or something? After a cursory look online, they&#x27
72.
by Mawr 3mo ago
> and essentially reduce to a launch cost penalty. Are you arguing that all this is technically possible or something? The whole point is that the costs would dwarf the gains. > You are right that they can't be serviced, but that
73.
by Mawr 3mo ago
Idk, is it? https://go.dev/blog/greenteagc > Is it even generational yet? Is there any reason in particular it should be? Or are you just throwing random buzzwords around? Anyways, https://github.com&#x2F
74.
by Mawr 3mo ago
Hilarious hysterical nonsense. Worst catastrophes? Pick any industrial accident with more than like 10 people killed and you've got nuclear beat. A single plane falls from the sky and you've outdone nuclear. Large swaths of land?
75.
by Mawr 3mo ago
It's a good thing there's nothing of the sort in TFA then? Quoting: "He moved fast and tried a lot of different stuff, jumping head first into problems that he was not yet equipped to solve, leading to mediocre outcomes in te
76.
by Mawr 3mo ago
Those statements are all consistent with the publicly observable facts like this whole thing going from "I'm experimenting with this" to "this is merged into main now, yolo" within a week or so. The complaints from
77.
by Mawr 3mo ago
> During communism movement within countries required a written permission slip And what does driving your car require if not a written permission slip?
78.
by Mawr 3mo ago
You underestimate the difficulty of designing a language by at least an order of magnitude. You've basically arbitrarily focused on a particular flawed design decision of a language while ignoring a thousand others that they may well h
79.
by Mawr 3mo ago
> Zig, Go, and Python If you cherry pick, any position is possible to argue for. What is C and error handling? What is Java and value types? What is C++ and modules?
80.
by Mawr 4mo ago
Huh, better insulation works great though? The talk of double glazing is funny to me, this was becoming a standard like 20 years ago where I live. Nowadays new construction does triple, with some special insulating gas between the panes. Si
81.
by Mawr 4mo ago
I don't know man, maybe read the rest of the comment? Are you serious?
82.
by Mawr 4mo ago
Those are all less safe than nuclear. It's a simple fact, look it up. All the places that can use hydro already do. Oh, and it's pretty damaging to the environment, it turns out. Wind and solar are pretty cool, but also unreliable
83.
by Mawr 4mo ago
Apparently the hypothetical future humanoids, somehow ignorant of all prior history, who will, ignoring all warning signs, start eating as much of the waste as fast as possible, then ignoring the obvious connection between eating that stuff
84.
by Mawr 4mo ago
Yeah, the efficient coal plants displaced the inefficient nuclear ones. Efficiency all the way! Climate change? Pollution? Nah, who cares, efficiency!
85.
by Mawr 4mo ago
You realize we're literally dispersing coal, gas & gasoline fumes into the atmosphere that we all breathe, right? 24/7? Yeah, small amounts of solid waste sitting somewhere is as much of a non issue as can be.
86.
by Mawr 4mo ago
> Many of the videos I captured amazing moments, and sometimes it's kind of hard to watch the full videos to get those moments. Yep. I had the same problem. > Then, run the frame analysis pipeline [...] I have a face recognition
87.
by Mawr 4mo ago
I suppose it is a significant downside that you could get misled into thinking you can autogenerate a changelog from commit names.
88.
by Mawr 4mo ago
Bro, it's not that deep. It's a facebook/youtube/travel/college machine with a nice screen, great build quality and awesome all day battery life. It's not an ultrageek wizz wozz local LLM performance junkie mac
89.
by Mawr 4mo ago
Yeah, and Dropbox is pointless, just use ftp.
90.
by Mawr 5mo ago
What, you wouldn't want a condescending lecture on which exact, unpopular even at the time, languages from the 80's, which had 10% of features of Zig and ran 20x slower, also had fast compilation times? For the 1000th time? Shame

More ›