3 ms·
1. The past is not a predictor of the future. Driving towards a cliff has very positive results right up until a sharply negative one. 2. Energy does not requi
by Mawr 2mo ago
1. The past is not a predictor of the future. Driving towards a cliff has very positive results right up until a sharply negative one.
2. Energy does not require damaging the environment through drilling. We can get it straight from our star, for example.
3. Dealing with the consequences of something is always more expensive than preventing it in the first place.
- Flere-Imsaho 2mo ago1. Of course it is. That is how models are built. They are not always correct of course, but it's the best we have. 2. We need to choose the cheapest energy option at the time. If renewables are cheaper then great, but making the poor even poorer to make is rich people feel better is not a good solution. 3. The consequences of making the world poorer is more people will die from climate related disasters.